Page 4 of 53
Re: Got any good jokes?
Posted: Mon May 15, 2017 5:41 pm
by Noax
thedoc wrote:ForCruxSake wrote:Why do some mathematicians go 'trick or treat'ing on Christmas Day?
Because they know 31 oct = 25 dec .
How is that?
(gdb) p /o 25
$1 = 031
Think computer, not mathematician, who rarely find a need for such notations.
Re: Got any good jokes?
Posted: Mon May 15, 2017 6:19 pm
by ForCruxSake
thedoc wrote:ForCruxSake wrote:Why do some mathematicians go 'trick or treat'ing on Christmas Day?
Because they know 31 oct = 25 dec .
How is that?
If I told you the joke works on being able equate sums using different numeric bases, could you work it out? (It's simple maths.)
Re: Got any good jokes?
Posted: Mon May 15, 2017 6:25 pm
by Harbal
ForCruxSake wrote:
If I told you the joke works on being able equate sums using different numeric bases, could you work it out? (It's simple maths.)
Thedoc finds "simple" a bit challenging, you're going to have to spell it out for him.
Re: Got any good jokes?
Posted: Mon May 15, 2017 7:17 pm
by thedoc
ForCruxSake wrote:thedoc wrote:ForCruxSake wrote:Why do some mathematicians go 'trick or treat'ing on Christmas Day?
Because they know 31 oct = 25 dec .
How is that?
If I told you the joke works on being able equate sums using different numeric bases, could you work it out? (It's simple maths.)
My math is a bit rusty, but 31 in base 8 is 24.8 and 25 in base 10 is 25, so it's not quite a match unless you round up. Or did I miss something, I really don't feel like putting a lot of effort into it.
Re: Got any good jokes?
Posted: Mon May 15, 2017 7:35 pm
by ForCruxSake
thedoc wrote:ForCruxSake wrote:thedoc wrote:
How is that?
If I told you the joke works on being able equate sums using different numeric bases, could you work it out? (It's simple maths.)
My math is a bit rusty, but 31 in base 8 is 24.8 and 25 in base 10 is 25, so it's not quite a match unless you round up. Or did I miss something, I really don't feel like putting a lot of effort into it.
[Base 8] 30 = 3x8 = 24 [Base 10]
[Base 8] 31= (3x8) + 1= 25 [Base 10]
How you got that 31, in base 8, is 24.8 is beyond me???
You get it now?
Re: Got any good jokes?
Posted: Mon May 15, 2017 8:13 pm
by thedoc
ForCruxSake wrote:thedoc wrote:ForCruxSake wrote:
If I told you the joke works on being able equate sums using different numeric bases, could you work it out? (It's simple maths.)
My math is a bit rusty, but 31 in base 8 is 24.8 and 25 in base 10 is 25, so it's not quite a match unless you round up. Or did I miss something, I really don't feel like putting a lot of effort into it.
[Base 8] 30 = 3x8 = 24 [Base 10]
[Base 8] 31= (3x8) + 1= 25 [Base 10]
How you got that 31, in base 8, is 24.8 is beyond me???
You get it now?
I see my mistake now, 30 in base 8 is 24 plus 1 in base 8 is still 1 and that all equals 25.
I took 31 times 8 equals 248, I just moved the decimal point, but 31 is still in base 10. I said my math was really rusty.
Re: Got any good jokes?
Posted: Tue May 16, 2017 12:23 pm
by Walker
Q: Why is there a law against throwing rocks in Washington D.C.
A: Because if you throw a philosophical concept you might miss a lawyer.
Re: Got any good jokes?
Posted: Tue May 16, 2017 4:00 pm
by Walker
If you ever wake up and you don’t know where you are,
ask someone to say,
Civil Rights.
If they say
Rats, you know you’re in a US southern state.
Not for any philosophical reason.
It’s the accent. Civil Rats.
Re: Got any good jokes?
Posted: Wed May 17, 2017 9:20 am
by Walker
Re: Got any good jokes?
Posted: Wed May 17, 2017 12:30 pm
by SpheresOfBalance
Hey I got one...
Walker!
Get it?
Poke, poke!
Re: Got any good jokes?
Posted: Wed May 17, 2017 8:16 pm
by Walker
Finally, evidence likely accidental appears to indicate that the usual lack of relevant analysis can in fact be appropriate, such as when latching onto a conclusion so highly dubious that it defies relationship with any rational process that could conceivably be based on a non-delusional premise.
Re: Got any good jokes?
Posted: Wed May 17, 2017 10:03 pm
by SpheresOfBalance
Walker wrote: ↑Wed May 17, 2017 8:16 pm
Finally, evidence likely accidental appears to indicate that the usual lack of relevant analysis can in fact be appropriate, such as when latching onto a conclusion so highly dubious that it defies relationship with any rational process that could conceivably be based on a non-delusional premise.
Actually the joke's on me, as when I wrote that, I believed that you had started this thread.
You know I'm just messing with you, right?
Re: Got any good jokes?
Posted: Thu May 18, 2017 2:01 am
by Walker
I should hope so, if you have any measure of couth.
Seriousness is situationally inappropriate.
Re: Got any good jokes?
Posted: Thu May 18, 2017 2:28 am
by thedoc
Re: Got any good jokes?
Posted: Thu May 18, 2017 2:31 am
by Walker