Re: Tear jerker.
Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2017 12:13 pm
I hope not, I feel sure I must have infringed something or other when I did it.vegetariantaxidermy wrote: I don't like mysteries. It's jolly good. Might even go viral.
For the discussion of all things philosophical, especially articles in the magazine Philosophy Now.
https://forum.philosophynow.org/
I hope not, I feel sure I must have infringed something or other when I did it.vegetariantaxidermy wrote: I don't like mysteries. It's jolly good. Might even go viral.
But isn't the essence of what Bradbury said, why you find it so funny?Harbal wrote:Lighten up Bradbury and get yourself a sense of humour.BradburyPound wrote: The song at the top of the thread is not sentimental, it is the embodiment of an ideological evil that has oppressed millions of people for two thousand years. It is an attempt to co-opt a person's natural tendency to familial loyalty for the purpose of social and political control.
You ought to be ashamed of yourself trying to defend this vile propaganda.
I thought it showed either a very sophisticated sense of humour, or none. Either way it was quite true.Harbal wrote:Lighten up Bradbury and get yourself a sense of humour.BradburyPound wrote: The song at the top of the thread is not sentimental, it is the embodiment of an ideological evil that has oppressed millions of people for two thousand years. It is an attempt to co-opt a person's natural tendency to familial loyalty for the purpose of social and political control.
You ought to be ashamed of yourself trying to defend this vile propaganda.
I find it funny because the perpetrators of it were serious. The fact that Bradbury takes it seriously, albeit for different reasons, indicates that he's a fool.A_Seagull wrote: But isn't the essence of what Bradbury said, why you find it so funny?
Harbal wrote:Lighten up Bradbury and get yourself a sense of humour.BradburyPound wrote: The song at the top of the thread is not sentimental, it is the embodiment of an ideological evil that has oppressed millions of people for two thousand years. It is an attempt to co-opt a person's natural tendency to familial loyalty for the purpose of social and political control.
You ought to be ashamed of yourself trying to defend this vile propaganda.
Sorry, Bradbury, I didn't realise you were listening.BradburyPound wrote:
A sense of humour is more than having a funny avatar and putting an Xmas hat on it.
If I were you I'd just keep doing your "elocution" lessons. Don't forget your Kleenex.
Just a guess.Harbal wrote:Sorry, Bradbury, I didn't realise you were listening.BradburyPound wrote:
A sense of humour is more than having a funny avatar and putting an Xmas hat on it.
If I were you I'd just keep doing your "elocution" lessons. Don't forget your Kleenex.
I love that song. Who are the 'singers'? Shane MacGowan is looking as if this was his last christmas.Harbal wrote:A bit late for Christmas but it's the thought that counts.
https://youtu.be/GAH_1tAf9fU
I don't think they have names, they're artificial voices (ipad app).vegetariantaxidermy wrote: I love that song. Who are the 'singers'?
He hasn't exactly looked a picture of health for along time.. Shane MacGowan is looking as if this was his last christmas.
Hmm. I thought I recognised one of them.Harbal wrote:
I don't think they have names, they're artificial voices (ipad app).
He looks even worse now.Harbal wrote:
He hasn't exactly looked a picture of health for along time.
I've just googled him and you're right, he does look pretty bad. Why can't we all just reach our peak and stay there?vegetariantaxidermy wrote: He looks even worse now.
That would be nice. If you could just press a button at the point at which you are most satisfied with yourself, then pop off when it suits you.Harbal wrote:I've just googled him and you're right, he does look pretty bad. Why can't we all just reach our peak and stay there?vegetariantaxidermy wrote: He looks even worse now.
I don't think that would have worked with me. I remember being in my mid thirties and feeling like I was over the hill, I certainly wouldn't have pressed the button then. Now, looking back, that's the age I would fix myself at. I think some of us are never happy with what we are.vegetariantaxidermy wrote: That would be nice. If you could just press a button at the point at which you are most satisfied with yourself,
Mid thirties for me too. I seemed to be most comfortable in my skin at that time.Harbal wrote:I don't think that would have worked with me. I remember being in my mid thirties and feeling like I was over the hill, I certainly wouldn't have pressed the button then. Now, looking back, that's the age I would fix myself at. I think some of us are never happy with what we are.vegetariantaxidermy wrote: That would be nice. If you could just press a button at the point at which you are most satisfied with yourself,