Which you have done most tediously.Harbal wrote:It's time to stop milking now, Hobbes, there are no prizes for reaching new heights of tediousness.Hobbes' Choice wrote: ich bin ein hamberger
Was Jesus Christ transgender?
Re: Was Jesus Christ transgender?
- Hobbes' Choice
- Posts: 8364
- Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:45 am
Re: Was Jesus Christ transgender?
attofishpi wrote:JesusPhilosophy Explorer wrote:... and no one has verified JC ever existed in history. Maybe someone will turn up more documents about JC.
Virtually all modern scholars of antiquity agree that Jesus existed historically,[g]
No they do not.
Pontius Pilate
The only physical, archaeological evidence that confirms the existence of Pilate is the Latin inscription found on a limestone block relating Pilate's tribute to Tiberius.]
This just means that the people making up all the shit about a bloke from Nazareth who had some sense nailed into him, knew who the governor was of Judea. Says nothing about Jesus.
- Hobbes' Choice
- Posts: 8364
- Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:45 am
Re: Was Jesus Christ transgender?
Harbal is the queen of milking something to death.thedoc wrote:Which you have done most tediously.Harbal wrote:It's time to stop milking now, Hobbes, there are no prizes for reaching new heights of tediousness.Hobbes' Choice wrote: ich bin ein hamberger
- Hobbes' Choice
- Posts: 8364
- Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:45 am
Re: Was Jesus Christ transgender?
Actually its more like a doughnought.thedoc wrote:Is that with cheese pickles and onions?Hobbes' Choice wrote: ich bin ein hamberger
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berliner_(doughnut)
When Kennedy thought he said "I am a Berliner", he actually said "I'm a donut"
- attofishpi
- Posts: 10528
- Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 8:10 am
- Location: Orion Spur
- Contact:
Re: Was Jesus Christ transgender?
attofishpi wrote:Yes they do.Hobbes' Choice wrote:No they do not.attofishpi wrote:
Jesus
Virtually all modern scholars of antiquity agree that Jesus existed historically,[g]
Virtually all modern scholars of antiquity agree that Jesus existed historically,[g] although the quest for the historical Jesus has produced little agreement on the historical reliability of the Gospels and on how closely the biblical Jesus reflects the historical Jesus.
The historicity of Jesus concerns the degree to which sources show Jesus of Nazareth existed as a historical figure. It concerns not just the issue of "what really happened," based upon the context of the time and place, but also the issue of how modern observers can come to know "what really happened."[1] A second issue is closely tied to historical research practices and methodologies for analyzing the reliability of primary sources and other historical evidence. It also considers the question of whether he was a Nazirite.[2][3]
An overwhelming majority of New Testament scholars and Near East historians, applying the standard criteria of historical investigation, find that the historicity of Jesus is more probable than not,[4][5][6][7][nb 1][nb 2][nb 3][nb 4] although they differ about the beliefs and teachings of Jesus as well as the accuracy of the details of his life that have been described in the gospels.[nb 5][13][nb 6][15]:168–173 While scholars have criticized Jesus scholarship for religious bias and lack of methodological soundness,[nb 7] with very few exceptions, such critics generally do support the historicity of Jesus, and reject the Christ myth theory that Jesus never existed.[17][nb 8][19][20][21]
This shows that fervent atheists will attempt to negate all historical facts when it comes to the life of Christ.Hobbes' Choice wrote:This just means that the people making up all the shit about a bloke from Nazareth who had some sense nailed into him, knew who the governor was of Judea. Says nothing about Jesus.attofishpi wrote: Pontius Pilate
The only physical, archaeological evidence that confirms the existence of Pilate is the Latin inscription found on a limestone block relating Pilate's tribute to Tiberius.[11] The artifact, sometimes known as the Pilate Stone, was discovered in 1961 by an archaeological team led by Antonio Frova.[12] It was found as a reused block within a staircase located in a semicircular structure behind the stage house of the Roman theatre at Caesarea, the city that served as Rome's administrative centre in the province of Judaea. Roman governors were based in Caesarea and only visited Jerusalem on special occasions, or in times of unrest. The artifact is a fragment of the dedicatory inscriptions of a building, probably a temple, which was constructed, possibly in honour of the emperor Tiberius,[13][14] dating to 26–36 AD.[11] The dedication states that Pilate was prefect of Judaea, read praefectus Iudaeae. The early governors of Judaea were of prefect rank, the later were of procurator rank, beginning with Cuspius Fadus in 44 AD. The artifact is currently housed in the Israel Museum, Jerusalem,[15][16] while a replica stands at Caesarea.[17]
....the only argument the scholars have is with his "mirrorcoils"...and who could blame these simple minded nitwits.
Last edited by attofishpi on Sun Feb 26, 2017 2:20 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Re: Was Jesus Christ transgender?
Then do you want coffee with that?Hobbes' Choice wrote: Actually its more like a doughnought.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berliner_(doughnut)
When Kennedy thought he said "I am a Berliner", he actually said "I'm a donut"
- Hobbes' Choice
- Posts: 8364
- Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:45 am
Re: Was Jesus Christ transgender?
No one is negating ANY facts. The fact is that there is ZERO contemporary evidence for a person called Jesus of Nazareth. So no historian can agree with your statement.attofishpi wrote:attofishpi wrote:Yes they do.Hobbes' Choice wrote:
No they do not.
This shows that fervent atheists will attempt to negate all historical facts when it comes to the life of Christ.
It is a fact that there was a man named Pilate. But as the existence of George VI as king of England in 1938 the year Superman first appeared in comics, does not validate the existence of Superman; The existence of Pilate does not validate the existence of Jesus.
I imagine there was a rabbi called Jesus around that time, as Jesus was a common enough name. It might even be the case that such a person was nailed to a cross by Pilate - crucifixions was also very commonplace. Is is likely that his exploits might have been somewhat exaggerated - definitely. Does this amount to the Bible being reliable _ no fucking way.
But the person Jesus as he appears in the Bible - written generations later - does not exist. Pretty much the same thing goes for Homer's heros. Was there a guy called Agamemnon, Achilles, etc... Maybe - did they have talking horses and deities appearing in front of them? Did Odysseus really meet a woman called Kirkes? Another called Calypso. Did he really enter the underworld to meet his old pals?
I think not.
- Hobbes' Choice
- Posts: 8364
- Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:45 am
Re: Was Jesus Christ transgender?
A cup of tea is best!thedoc wrote:Then do you want coffee with that?Hobbes' Choice wrote: Actually its more like a doughnought.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berliner_(doughnut)
When Kennedy thought he said "I am a Berliner", he actually said "I'm a donut"
With milk... owing to a surfeit caused by Harbal milking everything.
- attofishpi
- Posts: 10528
- Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 8:10 am
- Location: Orion Spur
- Contact:
Re: Was Jesus Christ transgender?
Did any of these 'people' forge a way of life with with such reverence that billions of people pay homage to them on a daily basis?Hobbes' Choice wrote:No one is negating ANY facts. The fact is that there is ZERO contemporary evidence for a person called Jesus of Nazareth. So no historian can agree with your statement.attofishpi wrote:attofishpi wrote:
Yes they do.
This shows that fervent atheists will attempt to negate all historical facts when it comes to the life of Christ.
It is a fact that there was a man named Pilate. But as the existence of George VI as king of England in 1938 the year Superman first appeared in comics, does not validate the existence of Superman; The existence of Pilate does not validate the existence of Jesus.
I imagine there was a rabbi called Jesus around that time, as Jesus was a common enough name. It might even be the case that such a person was nailed to a cross by Pilate - crucifixions was also very commonplace. Is is likely that his exploits might have been somewhat exaggerated - definitely. Does this amount to the Bible being reliable _ no fucking way.
But the person Jesus as he appears in the Bible - written generations later - does not exist. Pretty much the same thing goes for Homer's heros. Was there a guy called Agamemnon, Achilles, etc... Maybe - did they have talking horses and deities appearing in front of them? Did Odysseus really meet a woman called Kirkes? Another called Calypso. Did he really enter the underworld to meet his old pals?
I think not.
At the end of the day Jesus existed and still exists, and his wise words and his suffering are something to behold and indeed something that one should show some humility toward.
...and by the way -where is the encyclopedia getting this notion from then:= "Virtually all modern scholars of antiquity agree that Jesus existed historically,"
- Greatest I am
- Posts: 2964
- Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 5:09 pm
Re: Was Jesus Christ transgender?
"Virtually all modern scholars of antiquity agree that Jesus existed historically,"
I see this as an outright lie.
http://bigthink.com/philip-perry/a-grow ... 1-41479093
Gnostic Christians have always thought of Jesus as an archetypal good man.
As in all archetypes, someone will name their children by that name so some Jesus' likely were real but they would not be the imaginary miracle working Jesus that Christianity adores and hope to ride as their scapegoat into heaven.
If one looks at the morality of the miracle working imaginary Jesus, it become clear that he is not divine as his morals are less than what we have today.
Especially his no divorce and substitutionary punishment policy are immoral and anti-love.
Even if the miracle worker existed, he is not worthy of being followed.
Regards
DL
I see this as an outright lie.
http://bigthink.com/philip-perry/a-grow ... 1-41479093
Gnostic Christians have always thought of Jesus as an archetypal good man.
As in all archetypes, someone will name their children by that name so some Jesus' likely were real but they would not be the imaginary miracle working Jesus that Christianity adores and hope to ride as their scapegoat into heaven.
If one looks at the morality of the miracle working imaginary Jesus, it become clear that he is not divine as his morals are less than what we have today.
Especially his no divorce and substitutionary punishment policy are immoral and anti-love.
Even if the miracle worker existed, he is not worthy of being followed.
Regards
DL
Re: Was Jesus Christ transgender?
The site of Troy has been discovered lending credence to Homers account, and another researcher has followed the course of the Odyssey and has discovered that most, if not all, the sites actually existed.Hobbes' Choice wrote: But the person Jesus as he appears in the Bible - written generations later - does not exist. Pretty much the same thing goes for Homer's heros. Was there a guy called Agamemnon, Achilles, etc... Maybe - did they have talking horses and deities appearing in front of them? Did Odysseus really meet a woman called Kirkes? Another called Calypso. Did he really enter the underworld to meet his old pals?
I think not.
Re: Was Jesus Christ transgender?
And Calypso is alive and well, and living in Trinidad.thedoc wrote:The site of Troy has been discovered lending credence to Homers account, and another researcher has followed the course of the Odyssey and has discovered that most, if not all, the sites actually existed.Hobbes' Choice wrote: Did Odysseus really meet a woman called Kirkes? Another called Calypso. Did he really enter the underworld to meet his old pals?
I think not.
Re: Was Jesus Christ transgender?
Good for her, is there anything else you want to make fun of?Harbal wrote:And Calypso is alive and well, and living in Trinidad.thedoc wrote:The site of Troy has been discovered lending credence to Homers account, and another researcher has followed the course of the Odyssey and has discovered that most, if not all, the sites actually existed.Hobbes' Choice wrote: Did Odysseus really meet a woman called Kirkes? Another called Calypso. Did he really enter the underworld to meet his old pals?
I think not.
Re: Was Jesus Christ transgender?
Not right now, doc, but when I do, I know I can always count on you to provide the opportunity.thedoc wrote:is there anything else you want to make fun of?
- Hobbes' Choice
- Posts: 8364
- Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:45 am
Re: Was Jesus Christ transgender?
No because they are only people.attofishpi wrote:Did any of these 'people' forge a way of life with with such reverence that billions of people pay homage to them on a daily basis?Hobbes' Choice wrote:No one is negating ANY facts. The fact is that there is ZERO contemporary evidence for a person called Jesus of Nazareth. So no historian can agree with your statement.attofishpi wrote:
It is a fact that there was a man named Pilate. But as the existence of George VI as king of England in 1938 the year Superman first appeared in comics, does not validate the existence of Superman; The existence of Pilate does not validate the existence of Jesus.
I imagine there was a rabbi called Jesus around that time, as Jesus was a common enough name. It might even be the case that such a person was nailed to a cross by Pilate - crucifixions was also very commonplace. Is is likely that his exploits might have been somewhat exaggerated - definitely. Does this amount to the Bible being reliable _ no fucking way.
But the person Jesus as he appears in the Bible - written generations later - does not exist. Pretty much the same thing goes for Homer's heros. Was there a guy called Agamemnon, Achilles, etc... Maybe - did they have talking horses and deities appearing in front of them? Did Odysseus really meet a woman called Kirkes? Another called Calypso. Did he really enter the underworld to meet his old pals?
I think not.
And whoever the fuck the historical Jesus was - he was also just a person.
Paying homage to an ordinary person, and pretending he is a god is for idiots.