france

[Arising_uk]

Chew it over. A good actor transcends shit scripts, and bad sets. All the other doctors managed to do that.

Fair point and I've been listening on radio to his series and it's not so bad. So maybe I meant the BBC budget was in the doldrums and CGI was not advanced enough at the time.

[Hobbes' Choice]

Chew it over. A good actor transcends shit scripts, and bad sets. All the other doctors managed to do that.

Fair point and I've been listening on radio to his series and it's not so bad. So maybe I meant the BBC budget was in the doldrums and CGI was not advanced enough at the time.

I can't remember that well, but I don't think the sets were any better for Tom Baker but he seemed to bring more to the role, is what I meant.

[Dalek Prime]

Chew it over. A good actor transcends shit scripts, and bad sets. All the other doctors managed to do that.

Fair point and I've been listening on radio to his series and it's not so bad. So maybe I meant the BBC budget was in the doldrums and CGI was not advanced enough at the time.

I can't remember that well, but I don't think the sets were any better for Tom Baker but he seemed to bring more to the role, is what I meant.

I think you're right, Hobbes. I did lose track of Doctor Who after Tom Baker. Peter Davidson was always Tristan Farnham for me. I loved him in that role.

[Hobbes' Choice]

Fair point and I've been listening on radio to his series and it's not so bad. So maybe I meant the BBC budget was in the doldrums and CGI was not advanced enough at the time.

I can't remember that well, but I don't think the sets were any better for Tom Baker but he seemed to bring more to the role, is what I meant.

I think you're right, Hobbes. I did lose track of Doctor Who after Tom Baker. Peter Davidson was always Tristan Farnham for me. I loved him in that role.

He reminds me of.....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NC0IJQ_s7No