Well! It's about time.Dalek Prime wrote:My language. (No, not really.)thedoc wrote:Did you know that coffee is a really good cleaner, so what are you cleaning up.Dalek Prime wrote:I haven't had my coffee yet.
Humour Poll
Re: Humour Poll
-
- Posts: 4922
- Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2015 4:48 am
- Location: Living in a tree with Polly.
Re: Humour Poll
Not really. Your watch stopped.thedoc wrote: Well! It's about time.
Re: Humour Poll
Doesn't matter, it's still correct twice a day.Dalek Prime wrote:Not really. Your watch stopped.thedoc wrote: Well! It's about time.
Re: Humour Poll
The "Humor Poll" would have been more humorous if you had spelled it the "Humor pole", or "Humor pile".
- Hobbes' Choice
- Posts: 8364
- Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:45 am
Re: Humour Poll
Answers 2,3 and 4 ask you to vote for the opposite of what you mean.
eg.
Would you prefer humour to be left out, only when the thread is stupid?
This thread is not funny.
eg.
Would you prefer humour to be left out, only when the thread is stupid?
This thread is not funny.
-
- Posts: 4922
- Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2015 4:48 am
- Location: Living in a tree with Polly.
Re: Humour Poll
Yes, I mentioned I messed up the poll. As to funny, it wasn't meant to be. It's a serious issue for the forum. So, what's it to be? If people don't want humour, just say so.Hobbes' Choice wrote:Answers 2,3 and 4 ask you to vote for the opposite of what you mean.
eg.
Would you prefer humour to be left out, only when the thread is stupid?
This thread is not funny.
-
- Posts: 4922
- Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2015 4:48 am
- Location: Living in a tree with Polly.
Re: Humour Poll
Yes, I mentioned I messed up the poll. As to funny, it wasn't meant to be. It's a serious issue for the forum. So, what's it to be? If people don't want humour, just say so. But humour often has honesty and answers as well.Hobbes' Choice wrote:Answers 2,3 and 4 ask you to vote for the opposite of what you mean.
eg.
Would you prefer humour to be left out, only when the thread is stupid?
This thread is not funny.
So, does everyone want to go dry? Perhaps I will become a Calvinist, myself.
Addendum: I'm taking everything seriously now, and am going to start ripping holes in people's belief systems.
Re: Humour Poll
Promise?Dalek Prime wrote: So, does everyone want to go dry? Perhaps I will become a Calvinist, myself.
Addendum: I'm taking everything seriously now, and am going to start ripping holes in people's belief systems.
Re: Humour Poll
First you have to understand the belief system, before you criticize it, otherwise your statements are meaningless. So that will require a lot of work on your part, are you really up for it?
-
- Posts: 4922
- Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2015 4:48 am
- Location: Living in a tree with Polly.
Re: Humour Poll
Actually, no. It just has to be unreasoned, or have a weak premise. As well, you don't believe that yourself, as you don't understand mine, but think your criticisms are meaningful.thedoc wrote:First you have to understand the belief system, before you criticize it, otherwise your statements are meaningless. So that will require a lot of work on your part, are you really up for it?
Anyways, if I really were to give up my humour, life would become unbearable, so it's not going to happen. The forum will just have to live with good fun. I don't want to be the party-pooper. Cheers doc. You've talked me out of it.
This forum can weigh on a person sometimes. Reason and a good laugh are all we've got.
- Hobbes' Choice
- Posts: 8364
- Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:45 am
Re: Humour Poll
Humour is best when in agreement. If it's used defensively it tends to look like defeat and people, if they are going to get funny, in those circumstances tend to get insulting, either to the person or to denigrate the importance of the issue.Dalek Prime wrote:Yes, I mentioned I messed up the poll. As to funny, it wasn't meant to be. It's a serious issue for the forum. So, what's it to be? If people don't want humour, just say so. But humour often has honesty and answers as well.Hobbes' Choice wrote:Answers 2,3 and 4 ask you to vote for the opposite of what you mean.
eg.
Would you prefer humour to be left out, only when the thread is stupid?
This thread is not funny.
So, does everyone want to go dry? Perhaps I will become a Calvinist, myself.
Addendum: I'm taking everything seriously now, and am going to start ripping holes in people's belief systems.
Some ideas are just so stupid that the only response is ridicule.
[Edited by iMod]
Re: Humour Poll
The addendum can be titled: Looking for truth in all the wrong places.Dalek Prime wrote:Yes, I mentioned I messed up the poll. As to funny, it wasn't meant to be. It's a serious issue for the forum. So, what's it to be? If people don't want humour, just say so. But humour often has honesty and answers as well.Hobbes' Choice wrote:Answers 2,3 and 4 ask you to vote for the opposite of what you mean.
eg.
Would you prefer humour to be left out, only when the thread is stupid?
This thread is not funny.
So, does everyone want to go dry? Perhaps I will become a Calvinist, myself.
Addendum: I'm taking everything seriously now, and am going to start ripping holes in people's belief systems.
Any confusion about the appropriateness of humor likely derives from the assumption that comedians are joking.
The repetition of empirical evidence indicates that philosophical views of forest soon evolve into questions and squabbles concerning trees and branches and leaves, with frequent farm references of fertilizer, and as anyone who has trudged across the tundra knows, the shoes affect the walk.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_P7yWnAAd0
-
- Posts: 4922
- Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2015 4:48 am
- Location: Living in a tree with Polly.
Re: Humour Poll
Whatever. I rarely joke without a grain or more of truth to it.Walker wrote:The addendum can be titled: Looking for truth in all the wrong places.Dalek Prime wrote:Yes, I mentioned I messed up the poll. As to funny, it wasn't meant to be. It's a serious issue for the forum. So, what's it to be? If people don't want humour, just say so. But humour often has honesty and answers as well.Hobbes' Choice wrote:Answers 2,3 and 4 ask you to vote for the opposite of what you mean.
eg.
Would you prefer humour to be left out, only when the thread is stupid?
This thread is not funny.
So, does everyone want to go dry? Perhaps I will become a Calvinist, myself.
Addendum: I'm taking everything seriously now, and am going to start ripping holes in people's belief systems.
Any confusion about the appropriateness of humor likely derives from the assumption that comedians are joking.
The repetition of empirical evidence indicates that philosophical views of forest soon evolve into questions and squabbles concerning trees and branches and leaves, with frequent farm references of fertilizer, and as anyone who has trudged across the tundra knows, the shoes affect the walk.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_P7yWnAAd0