SpheresOfBalance wrote:Why, you are stupid aren't you? A female is half a human, of course!
What you actually think is, slightly less than a male.
Because with your standard arguments of the past, you surely seemed like a female.
And that involves being what?
I have never said females are less than males. ...
And yet you use it as an insult to a male?
It's always been you, that has been misogynistic, in defense of your, supposed manhood. ...
Where do I defend my manhood?
If not a misogynist, why so worried about being called a female? ...
I'm not, I'm just pointing out that since I am a male why would you think calling me a female applies?
If men and women are equal why worry that you are being seen as a female? ...
Who said people are equal and what are you describing with the phrase "men and women are equal"?
Must be that you consider females less than males, for you to be so offended. ...
Who's offended? That you think this is your misogyny.
You seem extremely preoccupied with misogynistic behavior, surely only females are so consumed by it, fighting for their equal rights, (and I don't blame them), such that surely you seem a female.
And there you have it. I'm concerned because I have a mother, sister and daughter.
No Idiot! If you had actually paid attention all these years, you'd have noticed that I've always said that I don't have too high a regard for IQ tests. ...
And yet you went with the 'what's your IQ? 10.' crack?
That largely they have to do with memory, not necessarily intelligence. ...
No they don't. They are largely to do with pattern-recognition and general knowledge of grammar.
But for those that do consider them telling of ones capabilities, I have provided mine, which I'm happy with, as I don't require one that is higher than genius to know how capable I am.
Who does?
What is your IQ then? If you can;t remeber then take the link test I provided. I took it for fun as I had no idea what my IQ was supposed to be and it was your crack that led me to have a go.
Whilst you're there take the psychopath one as well.
Everything!
No they haven't.
There is nothing wrong with provoking thought, but then I guess you'd think so, seeing as how you believe only you can know, while all others can only try, unless they agree with you of course.
Actually you are describing Bill and yourself here.
FYI, People that visit here, can and do talk elsewhere, my friend, Duh!
They can, its called mob and clique behaviour.
So then why worry about it?
You brought it up?
Just like we don't want to listen to a self aggrandizing, would be know it all, (especially an English wizard), that is so utterly fearful that they might die from a nuclear doomsday device, that they'd actually kill an innocent infant to save their old worthless ass, using all of humanities fear of death as their shield of reason, and their 'get out of jail free card' in the face of the aftermath.
You are demented. I'd kill that child to save my kids and all the other innocent children that you will conveniently leave to die to save your psychopathic moralism.
Are you telling me that when you were Soviet nuclear sub hunting you would have not fired if the Soviets had told you that they have an innocent child on every sub?
Fearing such a death as nuclear Armageddon, does not necessarily make one sane; just as not fearing 'such a death,' does not necessarily make one insane.
I grew up having dreams of big silver missiles with USA on the side and big silver missiles with the hammer and sickle in red on the side landing on my head. Did it make me sane or insane? No it just made me realise that there's no point in worrying about shit you can't control and if one does worry then at least try and do something about it as then when you die from the event you'll die with a fairly clear conscience.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1gXY3kuDvSU
In your silly little thought experiment, ...
Not mine? but a fairly standard moral quandary in Philosophy.
that which would actually be guilty of killing off all life on the planet, would be that part of the human condition, that has plagued us since our beginning, that actually caused us to build such a device in the first place, that which is responsible for our, so called, solution in coming to grips with the ramifications of M.A.D., hence the riddle. And of course also those that would allow an infant to command such a device. Not he that understands all this, and refuses to save them from themselves. ...
Babble.
If you were drowning, even if by your own foolishness, I would risk my life to save you, as my life is the 'only' life I have complete dominion over, I've done it once before. ...
Do you think you would have done it without the training?
But I would not kill another to save you, as I would not kill you to save another. In such a case whom am I actually saving? Why am I actually saving? What am I actually saving? Who actually deserves saving? Who actually doesn't deserve saving? What actually is saving? What is actually most important to save? To actually save whom for whom? To actually save whom for what? To actually save what for whom? To actually save what for what? We have all actually been born. And we shall all actually die. Very few of us that claim we want to die would actually cause it to happen, though some do. Why? In the scheme of all things universal, what has mankind done, so altruistic, so as to warrant being saved from his own folly?
Is this why you left the Navy?
Well you surly do appeal to the mobs support often enough, that one would think you'd know all about it. Is that knowledge for you? Simply being in agreement with the mob and your heros?
Well I certainly think that there can be agreement amongst people but my words were just about you decrying the other forum members here. As all I said was I'll leave them to judge your words against me as I already think them false.
You do it so constantly, that I'd have a problem not finding evidence.
Still waiting?
Also where is this 'logical' analysis you promised?
You're the one that fears being seen as a female, who's the misogynist? That's right, you are!
I don't fear being called a female, I just wonder what this means in this context?
There's a lie right there, as you can't possibly know what I might do. See what I mean, you lie all the time. You especially lie about Bill. And me, when I challenge you. You do it with Bob too, but then so does he, so he deserves it.
Still waiting for you to take the tests. What are you scared of?
There's another lie, as I've already told you again and again how it's to be used. You can blame it on your flawed memory, so as to cover your tracks, but we both know you're just a liar.
Only in your psycho-babble fantasies. Your claim is that because we can't know everything we can know nothing. I think this false.
Ditto! But obviously your hacking away at the threads history of three deep has left you screwing up knowing how to respond effectively.
You should drop those old habits as it's easier to not re-quote everything but just quote what's been said and then you can trace the thread back.
Because you're constantly hiding from the truths that you fear, with your emoticons, self serving false characterizations, and lies, etc. ...
Show me.
Largely you create your version of reality through denial of painful truths like most selfish humans.
Psycho-babble.
On the other hand I have been honest to such an extent as to purposely bare a large portion of myself naked for all to see and judge, as I fear no mans ignorance.
Prejudging already I see, none but the blind eh!
At least not in a forum of argument. Face to face is another matter. In that arena, depending upon what they might bring to the table, I may only expect the worst of men, and so I'll counter with the worst, as defense should always have the final say in such a matter.
There's an irony, as I only expect the best face-to-face and respond only if the worst occurs. You've had a lot of strife in your life I suspect.