Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Mon Mar 11, 2024 7:00 am
A way to reframe the op is to ask: is it time to stop giving money to the rich they haven't earned?
For example, fractional banking BS. Banks can loan money to you. When they've loaned it to you owe them not only that money but also interest. IN addition to that the bank can now loan out that sum they loaned you to someone else. They can do this many times. That means....they create money out of nothing. There are other ways the law, government, society send money to the already wealthy, that ends up being taken from others. To change such practices is not taking from the rich, let alone theft, it is stopping a theft. And what happens when a bank creates money out of nothing. It reduces the value of money. Amongst other things. A plumber's money. A construction worker's pay check. Now worth less.
You show the tip of the iceberg.
I wrote this a while back on a world bank.
The criminal element hates a one world governance; that makes me for it. You?
Given my old criminal mind and delinquent attitude; I know that if I was my old self, I would hate the notion of a one world government.
Such a bank would prevent me from talking advantage of the white economy.
Fair taxation makes my criminal wallet lose twofold. I lose my gain and now must pay and play fair. Bummer.
Given my reform and apotheosis, I feel it is my duty to tell all my fellow white economy taxpayers, we all pay taxes, and it is foolish not to have a fair system.
Leaving unfair advantage to the black market does not seem like a good idea. Right?
I think I would vote for a One World Government, just to get the One World Bank.
If your government preaches against a One World Government, they are voting with the criminals who hate the idea.
Economically speaking; given that single source banking governance is easy, --- I think that moving a huge economic advantage from the black market to our white market, --- is a good idea.
I estimate that we all get a 30% raise in pay.
I am bought off. You?