Skepdick wrote: ↑Sun Mar 03, 2024 2:41 pm
That's not a realist stance.
The Big Bang is a singularity. Singularities are metaphysical/Mathematical entities.
That has nothing to do with the topic, okay word salad.
Again you are ignorant.
The reality, fact, truth and objectivity of the Big Bang is only valid within the embodied human-based science-physics-cosmological FSRC.
You cannot state the Big Bang Theory without explicitly and implicitly grounding it upon the FSRC. You cannot claim Big Bang happened because my mother, father said so!
Since the FSRC is embodied and human-based, it follows deductively whatever the resultants it cannot be p-realist but has to be antirealist [Kantian and the like].
In the video local realism = p-realism, while non-local realism = antirealism.
Therefore ideological and dogmatic p-realism of local realism is actually unreal and illusory.
Discuss??
Views??
There is no reason to think that locality/non-locality has anything to do with p realism/anti-realism. You start with equating them.
Your view is based on ignorance.
ChatGpt already informed you [somewhere] that scientists related to QM are divided into two camps, i.e. antirealists and p-realists.
Einstein [God do not play dice, hidden-variables] is a p-realist and is a staunch believer of locality.
You continue to conflate the two different issues. You've no idea what you're talking about.
