Philosphicalous wrote: ↑Thu Nov 16, 2023 11:53 pm
Age wrote: ↑Thu Nov 16, 2023 11:02 pm
Philosphicalous wrote: ↑Thu Nov 16, 2023 10:56 pm
Stay on topic do you identify as human? Aka Male Female
If you READ my post, then you would FIND and SEE ALL of 'it' is, more or less, ON the the 'human' topic.
Now, I do NOT identify as 'a human', 'a human being', 'a male', NOR 'a female'.
And, this is BECAUSE of who and what 'I' AM, EXACTLY.
I don’t READ past the first error or false claim in a response.
Okay, 'you' ARE FREE TO DO ABSOLUTELY ANY 'thing' 'you' like. However, have 'you' EVER CONSIDERED POINTING OUT, HIGHLIGHTING, and/or SHOWING what 'you' PERCEIVE to the 'first error or false claim', to 'you', EXPLAIN WHY 'it' is an error or false claim, to 'you', and then REMAIN OPEN to HEARING and SEEING from the "other's" perspective? Of, have 'you' NOT CONSIDERED just DOING 'this'?
SO, 'you' can LEARN MORE and/or ANEW.
OBVIOUSLY, if 'you' do NOT READ and LISTEN, 'you' can NOT LEARN, MORE and/or ANEW.
Philosphicalous wrote: ↑Thu Nov 16, 2023 11:53 pm
Thanks for responding even though you wine special plead and shout a lot.
BUT, 'you' just CLAIMED 'you' do NOT READ past the FIRST error or false claim in a response. So, how would 'you' KNOW if I so-called 'wine special plead' and/or 'shout a lot'? Unless, OF COURSE, I NEVER made an error not provided a false claim' until AFTER I did these supposed 'things' here?
By the way I have NEVER 'shouted' ONCE in this whole forum.
Philosphicalous wrote: ↑Thu Nov 16, 2023 11:53 pm
One Vote for NO I AM NOT HUMAN. I thank you. I know that its been hard but you have faced the truth with repentance in the end. Well done
LOL
I have NEVER been human BEFORE 'you' EVER came to 'this forum'. So, CLAIMING that it has been hard for 'me' to face the truth with repentance in the end IS A Truly ABSURD, ILLOGICAL, and NONSENSICAL CONCLUSION.
Also, what can be CLEARLY SEEN here is that 'this one' has just thrown out a 'lure' and IS 'trolling' ONLY for 'those' who SAY and/or CLAIM that 'they' ARE a human being. 'This one' is just FISHING, for A FIGHT/ARGUMENT, ONLY as some might say.
Now, 'you' want to CLAIM that 'you' ARE A 'Man', capital 'm', "philosphicalous", YET 'you' have NOT YET DEFINED what A 'Man' even IS, EXACTLY. So, what we have here is "ANOTHER one" who can NOT back up and support what 'it' CLAIMS is true.