For the discussion of all things philosophical, especially articles in the magazine Philosophy Now.
https://forum.philosophynow.org/
I didn't know you had one.Philosophy Explorer wrote:Well DUH, you've missed my point entirely.bobevenson wrote:Please, you can't get professionals for free, duh!Philosophy Explorer wrote:
Please, I fail to see how paying a juror would help them render a proper decision.
PhilX
PhilX
What happened to your Divine Guidance?bobevenson wrote:I didn't know you had one.Philosophy Explorer wrote:Well DUH, you've missed my point entirely.bobevenson wrote: Please, you can't get professionals for free, duh!
PhilX
bobevenson wrote:My comment is proof of the pudding.
if we did all that we would need people with law degrees to be on a jury. The same could be applied to politicians running for office, but then you wouldn't have anyone qualified who wanted the office, just like you do now.FlashDangerpants wrote:Absolutely. There should be a professional directory too which allows us to inspect who is on our jury and what their credentials are, where they studied, who their friends are and what they get up to on social media (so we can estimate their biases ofc).Terrapin Station wrote:Why not just model it after professional referee/umpire/etc. crews in sports?FlashDangerpants wrote:How would you go about monitoring the job performance of professional jurors?
What qualification do they need? Will there be a college course for jury professionals?
Is there to be a separate set of jury-accountants who can decide fraud cases that no longer have to be explained to the courts in layman's terms?