Contextualism and Perspectivism relate locally while Relativism is global, i.e. extend to all of reality.
To those who condemned [insist it is stupid] or do not understand my FSRC [Framework and System of Reality and Cognition] thesis, I suggest reading the following article
Relativism
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/relativism/
You can skip '5. New Relativism' but to understand my FSRC one must read the whole article.Relativism, roughly put, is the view that truth and falsity, right and wrong, standards of reasoning, and procedures of justification are products of differing conventions and frameworks of assessment and that their authority is confined to the context giving rise to them.
More precisely, “relativism” covers views which maintain that—at a high level of abstraction—at least some class of things have the properties they have (e.g., beautiful, morally good, epistemically justified) not simpliciter, but only relative to a given framework of assessment (e.g., local cultural norms, individual standards), and correspondingly, that the truth of claims attributing these properties holds only once the relevant framework of assessment is specified or supplied.
Traditionally, Relativism is contrasted with:
Absolutism, Objectivism, Monism, Realism,
- Content: Main
1. What is Relativism?
2. Why Relativism?
3. A Brief History of an Old Idea
5. New Relativism
6. Conclusion
'Relativism' is fundamental to my FSRC but my FSRC has a wider coverage that avoid the "self-excepting" "self-refutation" fallacy of global 'Relativism.'
My principle of reality [FSRC];
All of reality, existence, facts, truths, justification, knowledge, description, and objectivity are contingent [conditioned] upon an embodied human-based Framework and System of Realization of Reality and Cognition [Knowledge] [FSRC].
While relativism focus on 'relative' or co-variance with, my FSRC focus on 'contingent' [conditioned].
Discuss??
Views??