Where?? I am very interested.promethean75 wrote: ↑Thu Feb 29, 2024 1:34 pm "What counts in any philosophical forum [such as here] are rational valid and sound arguments counts.
So far you have not provided any."
I already refuted your mind-dependent reality theory with my Problem Of The Interdependence Of Dual Percievers dilemma... or what i call my 'Berkeley Buster'.
It is because you did not quote the post you are replying to that I did not get notified of your refutation.
Btw, what I believe has nothing to do with Berkeley's Subjective Idealism.
Mine is Kant's Transcendental Idealism where he refuted Berkeley's Subjective Idealism in his very famous 'Refutation of Idealism'.
Kant’s Attempts to Distance Himself from Berkeley
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant ... ment1.html
Kant’s Critique of Berkeley
This chapter shows that despite the superficial similarities to which Turbayne and others point, Immanuel Kant’s transcendental standpoint differs fundamentally from George Berkeley’s position, and that Kant’s criticisms are a legitimate and philosophically significant expression of this difference.
https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/ ... ry-allison
In fact, Kant held Berkeley in contempt, by referring to him as the “good Bishop.” He only devoted like four pages to Berkeley, in the Critique. If I remember correctly, the section is titled "Refutation of Idealism", where he shows that Berkeley's subjective idealism is just false.
https://www.quora.com/Was-Berkeley-a-ce ... ce-of-Kant#: