Didn't ChatGpt advise you the noumenon is 100% unknowable.Atla wrote: ↑Thu Feb 22, 2024 6:29 pmUsing science, which has the refutation of your 100% unknowable noumenon philosophy, as the main pillar of your philosophy?Veritas Aequitas wrote: ↑Thu Feb 22, 2024 9:43 am To be charged with claims that are contradictory is a serious charge.
I won't leave this unchallenged.
Those who think I have present contradictions, show me precisely where?
I am not perfect thus it is possible I may have presented a contradictions and if true I will correct it. There is no way I will insist on it.
We are dealing with issues with a lot of nuances.
It is very likely the charge of contradiction against me is due to the other's ignorance and misinterpretations rather than my oversight.
In this case, it is most likely IWP was ignorant and misunderstood my point.Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Thu Feb 22, 2024 8:33 am In this last week you put out positions that contradict your own positions at least as much as those of others, but you don't notice this.
You don't notice that when you respond to people, most of the time, much of your response is a re-assertion of your position.
I am waiting for the details of his charge against me.
So, those who think I have presented contradictions, show me precisely where?
To attempt to 'know' the 'unknowable' is an oxymoron.
That is your contradiction, at the same time in the same sense.
If you think there is a contradiction in my views,
Can you present the contradiction in this format?
To show any real contradiction I have presented, show that
I have accepted p and not-p at the same time AND in the same sense.
Something like;
- Here is your P:
(give details)
Here is your NOT-P on the same issue:
(give details)
Then show where I have accept p and not-p at the same time AND in the same sense.