Take a look at all the philosophy prizes. They all require being an academic, being affiliated with an academic institution, having credentials, Havering been published, having been previously lauded, NONE of which has ANYTHING to do with the value of your ideas.
The best philosophical idea or set of ideas on Earth, ever, would be beneath contempt for them unless the philosopher was someone they respect for social reasons; integration, privilege, compliance.
Afternoon Philosophy is Not philosophy
Re: Afternoon Philosophy is Not philosophy
Is this state of affairs a surprise to you?Advocate wrote: ↑Mon Sep 18, 2023 9:24 pm Take a look at all the philosophy prizes. They all require being an academic, being affiliated with an academic institution, having credentials, Havering been published, having been previously lauded, NONE of which has ANYTHING to do with the value of your ideas.
The best philosophical idea or set of ideas on Earth, ever, would be beneath contempt for them unless the philosopher was someone they respect for social reasons; integration, privilege, compliance.
Why would professional philosophers suppose that amateurs would be the source of the best quality philosophy?
If you saw on YouTube that the best surgeon in the world was an auto mechanic in your town, would you have him perform your surgery?
Re: Afternoon Philosophy is Not philosophy
So do something about it; give a prize to an unknown, amateur philosopher.Advocate wrote: ↑Mon Sep 18, 2023 9:24 pm Take a look at all the philosophy prizes. They all require being an academic, being affiliated with an academic institution, having credentials, Havering been published, having been previously lauded, NONE of which has ANYTHING to do with the value of your ideas.
The best philosophical idea or set of ideas on Earth, ever, would be beneath contempt for them unless the philosopher was someone they respect for social reasons; integration, privilege, compliance.
Re: Afternoon Philosophy is Not philosophy
[quote=Harbal post_id=669748 time=1695661145 user_id=9107]
[quote=Advocate post_id=668379 time=1695068684 user_id=15238]
Take a look at all the philosophy prizes. They all require being an academic, being affiliated with an academic institution, having credentials, Havering been published, having been previously lauded, NONE of which has ANYTHING to do with the value of your ideas.
The best philosophical idea or set of ideas on Earth, ever, would be beneath contempt for them unless the philosopher was someone they respect for social reasons; integration, privilege, compliance.
[/quote]
So do something about it; give a prize to an unknown, amateur philosopher. :|
[/quote]
They make the prizes because they have the resources. Their assumption that the system produces the best outcomes is self-serving and technically wrong.
[quote=Advocate post_id=668379 time=1695068684 user_id=15238]
Take a look at all the philosophy prizes. They all require being an academic, being affiliated with an academic institution, having credentials, Havering been published, having been previously lauded, NONE of which has ANYTHING to do with the value of your ideas.
The best philosophical idea or set of ideas on Earth, ever, would be beneath contempt for them unless the philosopher was someone they respect for social reasons; integration, privilege, compliance.
[/quote]
So do something about it; give a prize to an unknown, amateur philosopher. :|
[/quote]
They make the prizes because they have the resources. Their assumption that the system produces the best outcomes is self-serving and technically wrong.