Trajk Logik wrote: ↑Thu Jul 27, 2023 12:40 am
Age wrote: ↑Tue Jul 25, 2023 10:46 pm
Trajk Logik wrote: ↑Mon Jul 24, 2023 1:01 pm
That has already been covered and you rejected it, which is perfectly fine with me, even though I find it nonsensical because it logically follows that different physiology lends to different behaviors, or else what would be the point of having different physiology? All of this can be found in a biology text book.
you seem to be MISUNDERSTANDING me here.
In ANOTHER way, How can one logically call a 'male bodied' one 'acting feminine', for example, if HOW 'men' and 'women' 'act' or 'behave' DIFFERENTLY is solely because of the 'male' and 'female' sexual organs?text book.
I don't understand the question. What does "a 'male bodied' one 'acting feminine'" mean?
That you are NOT ACTUALLY ABLE to DIFFERENTIATE between what 'acting' 'feminine' IS, EXACTLY, FROM what 'acting' 'masculine', nor 'male', is like, IS the WHOLE POINT here. Which SHOWS, and may well PROVE, that, ACTUALLY, there IS NO OTHER 'difference', other than the one I POINTED OUT and SHOWED earlier.
Unless you want to persist that their are ACTUAL DIFFERENT 'behaviours' that exist BETWEEN 'men' and 'women', which would logically FOLLOW and MEAN that ALL 'men' and ALL 'woman' MUST DO those VERY SPECIFIC 'behavior/s'. Which, if you do want to INSIST that there are, then will you list those 'behaviour/s', for us to LOOK AT and DISCUSS here?
If no, then WHY NOT?
But if yes, then GREAT.
Trajk Logik wrote: ↑Thu Jul 27, 2023 12:40 am
Men and women can act differently and it have nothing to do with their sexual organs, but there are some differences in behavior as a result of their sexual organs.
SO LIST these 'different acts', which supposedly have nothing to do with sexual organs.
We are ALREADY AWARE that you ASSUME or BELIEVE 'they' exist. We are just WAITING or you to list 'them', instead of you just ASSUMING that most people ALREADY KNOW 'them'.
The topic title of this thread is ASKING if there are DIFFERENCES, then what are 'they'?
What you have done IS NOT list ANY specific differences other then the ones apart from the reproductive organs, and what some of those organs purpose is.. Now, if there are ANY OTHER ACTUAL DIFFERENCES, then what are 'they', EXACTLY?
Trajk Logik wrote: ↑Thu Jul 27, 2023 12:40 am
Age wrote: ↑Tue Jul 25, 2023 10:46 pm
Trajk Logik wrote: ↑Mon Jul 24, 2023 1:01 pm
Simple logic and common sense.
REALLY?
And, WHY can and do two different people with the EXACTLY DIFFERENT OPPOSING VIEW FROM"each other" BOTH SAY and CLAIM the EXACT SAME 'thing'? That is; 'my view is true and right because of 'simple logic and common sense'.
So, WHEN two DIFFERENT people SAY and TELL me 'this', but they have DIFFERENT VIEWS, then which one should I LISTEN TO, and ACCEPT?
Who are these "two different people with different opposing views?
you seem to be MISSING THE ACTUAL POINT, ONCE MORE.
It does NOT matter.
Trajk Logik wrote: ↑Thu Jul 27, 2023 12:40 am
What are their opposing views?
Again, it does NOT matter as well.
Trajk Logik wrote: ↑Thu Jul 27, 2023 12:40 am
I have no idea what you are asking here.
And you are also SHOWING that you are doing absolutely nothing to OBTAIN CLARIFICATION, NEITHER.
Trajk Logik wrote: ↑Thu Jul 27, 2023 12:40 am
Age wrote: ↑Tue Jul 25, 2023 10:46 pm
Trajk Logik wrote: ↑Mon Jul 24, 2023 1:01 pm
Ask yourself, if you shared a job with someone who doesn't do their fair share wouldn't you become more picky about who fills that job?
Are you here essentially just asking is, 'Am I going to judge ALL future people one just that one person and what 'they' did or do not do?'
And the answer is, 'No'.
That is; I would NOT become so-called 'more picky' because of the behaviour of just one individual.
Fair enough. You are one that likes to risk being used by others and making the same mistake over and over.
Well this here is ANOTHER PRIME example of one ASSUMING and/or BELIEVING an ABSOLUTE ABSURDITY IS TRUE.
Also, can you really NOT YET fathom that I do NOT JUDGE one on what "ANOTHER" has, or has NOT, done?
Trajk Logik wrote: ↑Thu Jul 27, 2023 12:40 am
Age wrote: ↑Tue Jul 25, 2023 10:46 pm
ONCE AGAIN, you are making the CLAIM that you KNOW EVERY thing about a particular subject, this time about so-called 'sexual selection', while I know absolutely NOTHING.
Could you come across here as being MORE confident OF "your" 'self' hee?
ONCE AGAIN, I have never claimed to know everything or that you now nothing, only that I know more than you.
So, when you SAY things like; 'you do not know ANY thing about ...', then how does 'this' relate to what you now SAY about you did NOT say such a 'thing'?
Can you REALLY NOT SEE the CONTRADICTION here?
Trajk Logik wrote: ↑Thu Jul 27, 2023 12:40 am
I also claim to have read the article I posted a link to and you haven't.
I read enough to SEE that it had NOTHING to do with with what I have been POINTING OUT and SAYING here.