Do not list me.
Is God Necessary?
Re: Is God Necessary?
The question of whether God is necessary can and does only arise to the artificial sense of 'me'
The question comes from the position of 'me, which is always dissatisfied and is therefore looking for benefit to satisfy it.
It is incompleteness seeking completeness. Only lack needs benefit. Right here and now, nowhere, nothing is lacking.
For 'me' is the very movement of dissatisfaction. The 'me' cannot get no satisfaction.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nrIPxlFzDi0
.
Re: Is God Necessary?
If God isn't working for you, there's an alternative.Dontaskme wrote: ↑Sun Jul 09, 2023 12:27 pm
For 'me' is the very movement of dissatisfaction. The 'me' cannot get no satisfaction.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nrIPxlFzDi0
https://youtu.be/Jwtyn-L-2gQ
Re: Is God Necessary?
Right you are, Harbal!Harbal wrote: ↑Sun Jul 09, 2023 12:55 pmIf God isn't working for you, there's an alternative.Dontaskme wrote: ↑Sun Jul 09, 2023 12:27 pm
For 'me' is the very movement of dissatisfaction. The 'me' cannot get no satisfaction.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nrIPxlFzDi0
https://youtu.be/Jwtyn-L-2gQ
Re: Is God Necessary?
It's great to see you, Belinda. I've been wondering where you were; it seems ages since I last saw you.Belinda wrote: ↑Sun Jul 09, 2023 4:28 pmRight you are, Harbal!Harbal wrote: ↑Sun Jul 09, 2023 12:55 pmIf God isn't working for you, there's an alternative.Dontaskme wrote: ↑Sun Jul 09, 2023 12:27 pm
For 'me' is the very movement of dissatisfaction. The 'me' cannot get no satisfaction.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nrIPxlFzDi0
https://youtu.be/Jwtyn-L-2gQ
Re: Is God Necessary?
'God' is a fallacy caused by the idea of separation.
Separation is to name the nameless. To conceptualise the nonconceptual. To image the imageless. To know the unknown.
'What is' cannot tell 'what is' (itself) what is IS.
'What is' can only be IS ( SELF ) There is only SELF (what is)
'What is' has no opposite. 'What is' is complete unto itself.
Separation is to name the nameless. To conceptualise the nonconceptual. To image the imageless. To know the unknown.
'What is' cannot tell 'what is' (itself) what is IS.
'What is' can only be IS ( SELF ) There is only SELF (what is)
'What is' has no opposite. 'What is' is complete unto itself.
Re: Is God Necessary?
If God existed it would not be necessary to invent him.
If God did not exist is would also not be necessary to invent him.
If God was invented then it would not be necessary for him to exist.
If God did not exist is would also not be necessary to invent him.
If God was invented then it would not be necessary for him to exist.
Re: Is God Necessary?
Is Martian Necessary?