Then I must congratulate you on an excellent job.
The Paradox of Observation
Re: The Paradox of Observation
The observer is the zero distance from itself.
Re: The Paradox of Observation
Okay. If this is what you BELIEVE is true, the 'this' MUST BE TRUE, correct?Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 07, 2023 7:21 pm1. The first post.Age wrote: ↑Fri Jul 07, 2023 12:50 amWhat EXACTLY made you SAY and CLAIM 'this'? Or, do 'you' just like COPYING 'me'?
AND, what part/s of YOUR thread do you think or BELIEVE I am MISSING or MISUNDERSTANDING here?
Now, we AGAIN WAIT for YOUR ANSWER/S.
In relation to which sentence, EXACTLY?
But I usually use the word 'thing' to mean an object, or subject, which I did not wish to give a specific name or names to.
What did you think I meant by 'thing'?
What do you mean by 'thing'?Did I say, 'need delivered'?
AND, BECAUSE the Universe and Life 'just IS', 'you', human beings, WILL BE DELIVERED. To WHERE I have been POINTING OUT TO and SHOWING THE WAY TO here also, I will add.
'It' MIGHT.
If you say so.
Is it REALLY that HARD and/or TO COMPLEX for you to just ANSWER the QUESTIONS posed and ASKED here?
Re: The Paradox of Observation
The infinite /observer is a circle whose centre is everywhere and circumference nowhere. There is nothing outside of the circle.
Re: The Paradox of Observation
-
- Posts: 6802
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 10:55 pm
Re: The Paradox of Observation
Nope. I am saying that many people have and make sense. They are not completely lacking sense.
I am not sure why you don't just post gibberish. At the very least I hope you see the irony of trying to use deduction to show that nothing makes sense.
Re: The Paradox of Observation
Not exactly what you said, but yes, maybe what you meant, but written/said differently.
It's different that's all, many different ways of saying the same thing. Just the one love in action dreaming difference where there is none.
Indeed, aware of being aware, is the paradox of observation/perception.
Good to see people like Eodnhoj7 pointing out the most paramount quintessential fundamental nature of reality, inducive to both individual and collective understanding as to the true nature of observation.
Re: The Paradox of Observation
And, the word 'paradox' can mean, paradoxically, a statement that might first appear contradictory or absurd but which is actually expressing the truth.Dontaskme wrote: ↑Sun Jul 09, 2023 7:48 amNot exactly what you said, but yes, maybe what you meant, but written/said differently.
It's different that's all, many different ways of saying the same thing. Just the one love in action dreaming difference where there is none.
Indeed, aware of being aware, is the paradox of observation/perception.
Which, again paradoxically, is the EXACT OPPOSITE WAY of how some of 'you', human beings, USE 'that word'
Re: The Paradox of Observation
The point of all meaning is to distinguish the self as the ''owner'' of meaning. It is you who ''splits reality up'' into distinctions and dualities.
Re: The Paradox of Observation
Since WHEN, and TO WHO?
I thought that it was ALREADY COMMONLY KNOWN that the 'Self' was the so-called 'owner' of meaning, and that even the 'illusioned self', is in one way or another the, again so-called, 'owner' of meaning.
And WHO, or WHAT, does the 'you' word here, written under the label "dontaskme" here, REFER TO, EXACTLY?
The word 'you' even implies "an other", which OBVIOUSLY there is NOT. So, what 'we' have IS AN example of just how 'you', human beings, 'TRY' SO HARD to 'split up' and 'separate' 'That', which IS NOT.
BUT 'we' WILL WAIT to SEE what the 'you' word REFERS TO, EXACTLY, FIRST.
Re: The Paradox of Observation
Here we have ANOTHER example of how these human beings, back then, would SAY, WRITE, and USE 'words', BUT when just ASKED what some of those words ACTUALLY MEAN, or REFER TO, to 'them', 'we' are just left WONDERING.
Re: The Paradox of Observation
BUT 'we' WILL WAIT to SEE what the 'you' word REFERS TO, EXACTLY, FIRST.
The point of all meaning is to distinguish the self as the ''owner'' of meaning.
Your job is to make meaning meaningful to you. When you can make that true, then it all makes sense.
Re: The Paradox of Observation
BUT there is NO, ACTUAL, 'you' NOR 'self'.
Absolutely NO one so-call 'makes meaning meaningful'.
'Words' come WITH 'meaning', which arises WITHIN the 'thoughts' and 'thinking' WITHIN human bodies.
ONCE AGAIN, what is the 'you' word here even REFERRING TO, EXACTLY?Veritas Aequitas wrote: ↑Sun Jul 09, 2023 8:20 am When you can make that true, then it all makes sense.