Ouch! G'nite.Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Fri May 05, 2023 9:55 pmTouché.Agent Smith wrote: ↑Fri May 05, 2023 9:50 pmSome things are impossible unless
1. Math is amazing
2. President Carter ate hot dog at least once in his life
3. Swig means drink
1=0 III
- Agent Smith
- Posts: 1442
- Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2022 12:23 pm
Re: 1=0 III
Re: 1=0 III
WHO CLAIMS that 'it' is NOT real?Agent Smith wrote: ↑Thu May 04, 2023 3:32 am 1 = 0
I wish time travel were real!! The question is in which direction would you wanna go, backwards/forwards, or ... are they the same thing? Phuwaaa!!
Re: 1=0 III
BUT WHO WOULD EVER CLAIM that 'totality' is WITHOUT 'form'?Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Fri May 05, 2023 8:14 pm1. If the totality is without form then it is not a thing thus nothing.Age wrote: ↑Thu May 04, 2023 2:10 amI KNOW, 'this' IS WHAT I HAVE BEEN SAYING and WRITING here. Had you REALLY NOT YET NOTICED 'this'?That all depends on what the 'it' here IS, EXACTLY?LOL
LOL
LOL
If this is what you want to BELIEVE is true, then that is perfectly fine and okay with me.
The ABSOLUTE STUPIDITY of this here SPEAKS, LOUD and CLEAR, for ITSELF.Is this what you REALLY BELIEVE is true?That 'you', adult human beings, ARE MISBEHAVING IS, OBVIOUSLY, Correct. BUT, MISBEHAVING IS, JUST AS OBVIOUS, NOT THE Correct 'thing' TO DO, in this One and ONLY Life.OBVIOUSLY, one can be guided on HOW TO do some 'thing', AND THEN do 'it' for and/or by "them" 'self' For example, one could be TAUGHT, or GUIDED, on HOW TO FIND 'things' for and by "them" 'self, on their OWN, AND THEN that one COULD THEN go out, on their own, to FIND whatever they have been TAUGHT, or GUIDED ON HOW, TO FIND.BUT I AM NOT 'reducing' ANY 'thing' here.
OBVIOUSLY there IS A 'Right' AND A 'Wrong', in Life.
Can you NOT YET SEE this Fact?LOL Okay.
ALL 'things' that NEED EXPLAING take DIFFERENT lengths of response. ALL depending on the GUIDER/TEACHER and the LEARNER/STUDENT.
By the way, I KNOW that to EXPLAIN TO 'you', what can be EXPLAINED TO "another" in just three letters, could take a WHOLE lifetime of yours, and WITHOUT 'you' EVER becoming THE WISER
Has absolutely ANY one in this forum CLAIMED such a 'thing' as 'this'?
If yes, then WHO, EXACTLY?
EXACTLY as I SAID BEFORE, that ALL DEPENDS on what the 'it' IS, EXACTLY.
you brought up the 'it' word WITHOUT CLARIFYING what 'it' was in reference TO, EXACTLY. So, that IS WHY I SAID what I did here BEFORE, and have AGAIN, now.
'you' REALLY DO TWIST and DISTORT 'things' AROUND SO MUCH "eodnhoj7", and thus WHY you end up SAYING the MOST STUPID, ABSURD, SELF-CONTRADICTORY and RIDICULOUS 'things', like AGAIN just here now.
NO, NOT AT ALL.
As I CONTINUALLY INFORM 'you', people, here. I NEITHER BELIEVE NOR DISBELIEVE ANY 'thing' AT ALL, (except for the One 'thing', which is NOT in the question that you just asked here).
If 'the one' is correct, or NOT correct, is, AGAIN, ANOTHER completely and utterly STUPID and NONSENSICAL remark and comment.
'This' does NOT necessitate what you say here AT ALL. What the 'this' word refers to IS JUST STUPID and NONSENSICAL to BEGIN WITH. Which, ACTUALLY necessitates TO just MORE ABSURDITY here. As can be CLEARLY SEEN and PROVED IRREFUTABLY True.
But WHO CLAIMS there WAS SOME 'path laid before them'?
Did you REALLY READ the ACTUAL WORDS that I WROTE and SAID above here?
YOUR WORDS here SEEM TO PROVE you DID NOT.
WHAT 'path' are you going on ABOUT here?
I NEVER mentioned ANY 'thing' ABOUT ANY 'path', and, I do NOT recall you ever mentioning the 'path' word prior EITHER.
you USE the 'contradiction' word in A WAY that I have NEVER come across with "ANOTHER" one of 'you' human beings.
How are 'you' DEFINING the 'contradiction' word here "eodnhoj7"?
To me there IS A Right and A Wrong, in Life, just like there IS A left (foot) and A right (foot), but 'these' do NOT leave me with absolutely ANY 'contradiction' AT ALL.
BUT BECAUSE you seem to be USING the word 'contradiction' in some OTHER way, we WILL WAIT to SEE what TRANSPIRES here now.
1. I am NOT here to learn how to 'socialize'. I am here to LEARN how to communicate BETTER with 'you', human beings.
2. YES, VERY True 'you', "eodnhoj7", are TEACHING 'me' how to communicate BETTER with 'you', human beings. But NOT necessarily in THE WAY that you might think nor envision.
Wow REALLY?
If yes, then what are those three letters, EXACTLY?
Re: 1=0 III
But if history does NOT so-call repeat, then is there REALLY a future or NOT, to 'you', "eodnhoj7"?Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Fri May 05, 2023 8:15 pmIf history repeats then is there really a future?Agent Smith wrote: ↑Thu May 04, 2023 3:32 am 1 = 0
I wish time travel were real!! The question is in which direction would you wanna go, backwards/forwards, or ... are they the same thing? Phuwaaa!!
Re: 1=0 III
Did you mean 'descent' here?Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Fri May 05, 2023 8:51 pmOne mans ascent is another's decent....up and down are the same thing in 0 gravity. If I fall 6 feet I am being raised 6 feet from the sky.Agent Smith wrote: ↑Fri May 05, 2023 8:28 pmGracias Eodnhoj7!
A lightbulb went off in Kimran's pretty head ... cars and graves make an odd couple but given enough rope 6 feet over is the same as 6 feet under, oui?
Because there is, literally, NOT much difference at all, REALLY, from adult human beings being 'in-decent' and in humankind's 'currently' spirally descent'.
By the way one does NOT 'fall' in zero gravity.
'you', human beings, only think 'you fall' BECAUSE of 'your' VERY LIMITED, SHALLOW, and NARROWED view and perspective of 'things'.
- Agent Smith
- Posts: 1442
- Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2022 12:23 pm
Re: 1=0 III
Is this room 300A?Age wrote: ↑Sat May 06, 2023 1:31 amWHO CLAIMS that 'it' is NOT real?Agent Smith wrote: ↑Thu May 04, 2023 3:32 am 1 = 0
I wish time travel were real!! The question is in which direction would you wanna go, backwards/forwards, or ... are they the same thing? Phuwaaa!!
No, can't you read?
Ah, humble apologies ma'am.
Re: 1=0 III
Just as I KNEW.Agent Smith wrote: ↑Sat May 06, 2023 2:07 amIs this room 300A?Age wrote: ↑Sat May 06, 2023 1:31 amWHO CLAIMS that 'it' is NOT real?Agent Smith wrote: ↑Thu May 04, 2023 3:32 am 1 = 0
I wish time travel were real!! The question is in which direction would you wanna go, backwards/forwards, or ... are they the same thing? Phuwaaa!!
No, can't you read?
Ah, humble apologies ma'am.
- Agent Smith
- Posts: 1442
- Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2022 12:23 pm
Re: 1=0 III
1. I would NOT make 'that CLAIM' to begin with. So, my own QUESTION would NEVER apply, to me ANSWERING 'it'.Agent Smith wrote: ↑Sat May 06, 2023 10:37 amJust curious, how would you answer your own question mon ami?Age wrote: ↑Sat May 06, 2023 9:22 amJust as I KNEW.Agent Smith wrote: ↑Sat May 06, 2023 2:07 am
Is this room 300A?
No, can't you read?
Ah, humble apologies ma'am.
2. Besides 'you' wishing 'time travel was real', which, if inferring that, to you, 'time travel is not real', then I do NOT know of ANY one "else" CLAIMING 'time travel' is NOT real, other than 'you' here "agent smith".
- Agent Smith
- Posts: 1442
- Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2022 12:23 pm
Re: 1=0 III
Why would you not make the/that claim then?Age wrote: ↑Sat May 06, 2023 11:30 am1. I would NOT make 'that CLAIM' to begin with. So, my own QUESTION would NEVER apply, to me ANSWERING 'it'.Agent Smith wrote: ↑Sat May 06, 2023 10:37 amJust curious, how would you answer your own question mon ami?
2. Besides 'you' wishing 'time travel was real', which, if inferring that, to you, 'time travel is not real', then I do NOT know of ANY one "else" CLAIMING 'time travel' is NOT real, other than 'you' here "agent smith".
Re: 1=0 III
BECAUSE what was commonly referred to as 'time travel' IS POSSIBLE.Agent Smith wrote: ↑Sat May 06, 2023 11:39 amWhy would you not make the/that claim then?Age wrote: ↑Sat May 06, 2023 11:30 am1. I would NOT make 'that CLAIM' to begin with. So, my own QUESTION would NEVER apply, to me ANSWERING 'it'.Agent Smith wrote: ↑Sat May 06, 2023 10:37 am
Just curious, how would you answer your own question mon ami?
2. Besides 'you' wishing 'time travel was real', which, if inferring that, to you, 'time travel is not real', then I do NOT know of ANY one "else" CLAIMING 'time travel' is NOT real, other than 'you' here "agent smith".
- Agent Smith
- Posts: 1442
- Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2022 12:23 pm
Re: 1=0 III
There's an appropriate counter for that move, but let's call it a day mon ami. Au revoir.Age wrote: ↑Sat May 06, 2023 12:42 pmBECAUSE what was commonly referred to as 'time travel' IS POSSIBLE.Agent Smith wrote: ↑Sat May 06, 2023 11:39 amWhy would you not make the/that claim then?Age wrote: ↑Sat May 06, 2023 11:30 am
1. I would NOT make 'that CLAIM' to begin with. So, my own QUESTION would NEVER apply, to me ANSWERING 'it'.
2. Besides 'you' wishing 'time travel was real', which, if inferring that, to you, 'time travel is not real', then I do NOT know of ANY one "else" CLAIMING 'time travel' is NOT real, other than 'you' here "agent smith".
Re: 1=0 III
It appears that the so-called and ALLEGED 'appropriate counter' was, in fact, NOT 'appropriate' AT ALL, and probably NEVER WAS.Agent Smith wrote: ↑Sat May 06, 2023 1:29 pmThere's an appropriate counter for that move, but let's call it a day mon ami. Au revoir.
- Agent Smith
- Posts: 1442
- Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2022 12:23 pm
Re: 1=0 III
Good day AgeAge wrote: ↑Sat May 06, 2023 1:41 pmIt appears that the so-called and ALLEGED 'appropriate counter' was, in fact, NOT 'appropriate' AT ALL, and probably NEVER WAS.Agent Smith wrote: ↑Sat May 06, 2023 1:29 pmThere's an appropriate counter for that move, but let's call it a day mon ami. Au revoir.
Re: 1=0 III
SO, AT FIRST, you CLAIM, there EXISTS an appropriate counter for MY so-called 'move', but THEN you just WANTED to so-call call 'it' 'a day'. However, you QUICKLY RETURN, and seem to WANT TO START 'the day' ALL OVER AGAIN. BUT with, YET AGAIN, NO ACTUAL 'appropriate' response, considering that we are in a philosophy forum.Agent Smith wrote: ↑Sat May 06, 2023 1:55 pmGood day AgeAge wrote: ↑Sat May 06, 2023 1:41 pmIt appears that the so-called and ALLEGED 'appropriate counter' was, in fact, NOT 'appropriate' AT ALL, and probably NEVER WAS.Agent Smith wrote: ↑Sat May 06, 2023 1:29 pm
There's an appropriate counter for that move, but let's call it a day mon ami. Au revoir.
By the way, WHY did you bold the 'age' word here?