Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Fri Apr 28, 2023 2:15 pm
Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Fri Apr 28, 2023 1:14 pm
Age wrote: ↑Fri Apr 28, 2023 1:08 pm
But the first sentence of "agent smith" here included the 'evidence' word, and this could be one of the most ambiguous words, which existed in the days when this is being written. That sentence also includes the 'argument' word, which can also be a VERY ambiguous word.
Furthermore, that sentence says that "alex baldwin" was acquitted, which some might misconstrue as that meaning that "alec baldwin" was actually NOT guilty, which is OBVIOUSLY VERY False.
Very good points age. Furthermore, if someone were reading your post, someone might skip over the word NOT, even though you took great care to capitalize it, and think that you said "meaning that "alec baldwin" was actually guilty", which of course is OBVIOUSLY VERY False.
In fact it seems as if the ways someone could misunderstand just about anything written here are bordering on infinite!
Seriously?
If your
apparant quoting of Age is not falsified, Age was merely pointing out the versatility of Agent Smith's. So, for you, Flannel Jesus, to then adminster Old Testament justice on Age and his post....
I'm aghast.
Fortunately both of your intents and acts are thoroughly ambiguous. I am making a conscious decision to, from this moment forward, view this series of posts as praising each other in the William Empson tradition. Consider me on team
generative...
This post, and even thread, is now further PROOF of the statement;
In fact it seems as if the ways someone could misunderstand just about anything written here are bordering on infinite!
And, as I have been continually POINTING OUT and SAYING here, in this forum, it is ONLY through OBTAINING CLARIFICATION, and/or CLARITY, that MISUNDERSTANDING DIMINISHES and UNDERSTANDING PREVAILS.