What are the merits Universal religion established by You?

[dattaswami]

What are the merits Universal religion established by You?

Shri Hrushikesh asked: What are the merits Universal religion established by You?

Swami replied: The world peace is disturbed by the differences between the religions. The correlation between the religions will bring unity and peace, which is the main aim of universal religion. Universal religion is not a different religion. It is only a correlated concept of all the religions to bind these bringing unity and peace. It is like the central government in India. All the religions are like state governments. Every citizen belongs to the state and to the center simultaneously. A human being in this country is called as Andhra because it belongs to the state called as Andhra Pradesh.

It is simultaneously the Indian also belonging to the central government of India. One need not leave the religion followed by him or her to enter the Universal religion, which contains the merits of all religions. The merit of science and atheism (atheism is also considered as one of the 6 spiritual schools by sage Vidyaaranya) is the application of logical analysis to the items of creation to prove that these items are parts of creation only so that misunderstanding anyone of these as God can be rejected. For example, awareness is proved as an item of imaginable creation and hence is not unimaginable God. Charvaka, the founder of atheism says that awareness is produced by the digestion of food (Madashaktih jaayate). You must accept a good concept spoken by even a bad person and conclude that imaginable awareness is not unimaginable God.

The merit from Hinduism is the spiritual knowledge concluded by sharp analysis, which avoids the exploitation of mind by misinterpretations of the scripture (Jnaana yoga). The merit from Islam is the emotional devotion and faith of mind in God with firmness (Bhakti yoga).The merit of Christianity is sacrifice of work and fruit of work in the divine service (Karma yoga). The merit from Buddhism is eradication of desire for any fruit from God so that prostitutional devotion and business devotion are avoided (Nishkaama karma yoga), which is the karma yoga transformed into Nishkaama karma yoga.

The splits between religions come due to the difference in the media of God. The underlying Unimaginable God in all these specific media of all specific religions is one and the same. When one fixes in a specific imaginable item of creation as God (which is actually one of the media of Unimaginable God), this difference comes because there is plurality in the items (media) of imaginable creation. The unimaginable God must be one only because any number of unimaginable items become only one unimaginable item. The Universal religion is based on this one Unimaginable God, which brings unity in all the religions regarding God. Similarly, the basic contents of the scriptures of all religions are one and the same. Hence, any person of any religion can have simultaneous registration in the Universal religion without leaving the religion already followed by him/her. This is the need of the hour in this present world to bring peace and love between all the human beings of the world.

[Harbal]

Shri Hrushikesh asked: What are the merits Universal religion established by You?

Swami replied: I'm glad you asked me that, Shri Hrushikesh, I always appreciate an opportunity to go into yet another senseless monologue.

[dattaswami]

Shri Hrushikesh asked: What are the merits Universal religion established by You?

Swami replied: I'm glad you asked me that, Shri Hrushikesh, I always appreciate an opportunity to go into yet another senseless monologue.

Bible says that Jesus is the God in flesh, but Gita says for a Hindu,
That Krishna is the God in flesh, let us analyse both these views?
I am not touching Buddhism and Islam in this topic because Islam believes
That Mohammad is not God in flesh and He was only messenger of God.
Buddhism keeps silent on the God and no question of God in flesh for them.

If the Bible told that Krishna was not God in flesh or if Gita told that
Jesus was not God in flesh, then both Bible and Gita are valid.
When the scriptures does not mention like this in complete version
How can you interpret your own scripture in the other way?
More over all of you whether Christians or Hindus have to accept
The concept of one God, there is no other alternative way in this.

You say that your God created this entire world and Hindus say that
Their God created this same entire world, unfortunately my dear friends!
I do not find two worlds and I find only one world! Now tell me
Whether this single entire world is created by Christian God or Hindu God?
One of you or both should be wrong and in that case who is wrong?
Either you should have two separate worlds or you should have single God.

If both the scriptures are wrong and both Gods did not create this Universe
Then the vote goes to Science, which says that the world exists by itself.
They say that no body created this world and it is self-existent.
Since both are sacred scriptures, let us solve this problem by analysis.
If you are rigid of your own scripture, I am not touching you at all.

If one is rigid where is the place for logical analysis and judgement?
In the court if one party says that what ever it says is the only truth
What is the necessity of the court, advocates, arguments and judgement?
If you leave rigidity and become flexible to accept the truth
After analysis only, you are most welcome to my Universal Spirituality
.
Even in the small worldly matters, we apply open mind and analysis,
I wonder why you are not applying the same open mind and analysis
In such most important spiritual knowledge which decides everything
The word Jesus stands for Human Incarnation and similarly the word Krishna.
In scriptures, we have to take the internal meanings and not simple external
Meanings for the sacred words, each word is ocean of divine knowledge.
Bible says that the lamb will come in red robe, here what is the meaning
For the word lamb? Is it simple animal with four legs and one tail.

Does this mean that Jesus will come again as animal? Here you say
That the word lamb stands for the Lord who is pure and innocent
Like the lamb, at one place you take the inner meaning and at other place
You take the external meaning! Therefore, the word Jesus means God in flesh,
Which means that the Lord comes in human form with blood and flesh.
This is a great concept, which Jesus tried to establish to the devotees.

Till then the Islam believed only in the formless God called Allah.
Islam does not treat Mohammad as God in flesh even today.
Jesus told that He and His father are one and the same, what does this mean?
Here the word father does not mean Joseph, the husband of His mother Mary.
If you take the meaning of the word of father in the external sense only
It is impossible because two human beings cannot be one and the same.
That Creator is indicated by the word father and human incarnation by the word Jesus
Both are one and the same since God pervaded all over the human incarnation.

If you take the meaning of the word Jesus as a particular human body only,
Then the meaning of the word father should also mean another particular human body.
In that case both the human bodies cannot be one and the same because
We are seeing the father and the son represented by two separate human bodies.
Similarly Jesus told that one could reach His father only through Him.
This again should mean that nobody could see or meet Joseph without Jesus.

But it is not so because several people have seen Joseph even before Jesus was born.
You are taking the inner meaning for the word father and say that father means God.
But for the word Jesus you are taking a particular human body only.
This is not justified and even a child will contradict this different approach.
When it is said that Jesus will baptise by fire, does it mean Jesus will sprinkle fire?

In such case the baptized person will be burnt with fire, therefore, the word fire
Means Knowledge as said in Gita “Jnanaagnih”, moreover if you stick the word
Jesus to a particular human body only and if you say that Jesus exists even now,
Please show Me Jesus as the same human body to My eyes also, in the past
When Jesus was alive everyone could show Jesus as human body to anyone.
Whether a believer or a non-believer saw Jesus as human body in the past.