Have you never felt?
So have I
So, considering the Fact that 'concepts' only came into existence AFTER the animal species evolved into existence, then this MEANS that ABSOLUTELY NOTHING WHATSOEVER AT ALL existed before 'concepts' came along.
But I never said ..Age wrote: ↑Wed May 11, 2022 10:21 am
So, considering the Fact that 'concepts' only came into existence AFTER the animal species evolved into existence, then this MEANS that ABSOLUTELY NOTHING WHATSOEVER AT ALL existed before 'concepts' came along.
Which, as I have ALREADY STATED, the ABSURDITY of this speaks for ITSELF.
You said it, the quote has you're name attached...not mine.Age wrote: ↑Wed May 11, 2022 10:21 am''So, considering the Fact that 'concepts' only came into existence AFTER the animal species evolved into existence, then this MEANS that ABSOLUTELY NOTHING WHATSOEVER AT ALL existed before 'concepts' came along.''
Which, as I have ALREADY STATED, the ABSURDITY of this speaks for ITSELF.''
LOL And what are the two numbers, to ALL the so-called "mathematicians", is the, laughable, infinite number supposedly between?
Talk about TWISTING and DISTORTING things around here.Dontaskme wrote: ↑Wed May 11, 2022 10:50 amBut I never said ..Age wrote: ↑Wed May 11, 2022 10:21 am
So, considering the Fact that 'concepts' only came into existence AFTER the animal species evolved into existence, then this MEANS that ABSOLUTELY NOTHING WHATSOEVER AT ALL existed before 'concepts' came along.
Which, as I have ALREADY STATED, the ABSURDITY of this speaks for ITSELF.You said it, the quote has you're name attached...not mine.Age wrote: ↑Wed May 11, 2022 10:21 am''So, considering the Fact that 'concepts' only came into existence AFTER the animal species evolved into existence, then this MEANS that ABSOLUTELY NOTHING WHATSOEVER AT ALL existed before 'concepts' came along.''
Which, as I have ALREADY STATED, the ABSURDITY of this speaks for ITSELF.''
So I'll repeat...For the human animal..all they know are concepts/things.
How difficult is that to understand?
The twisting or distorting was you're doing, not mine.
Yes, that is correct, I said all 'things' exist as 'concepts' only.
But 'dontaskme' never stated the underlined statement...'Age' stated the underlined statement.
WHERE and/or WHAT, EXACTLY, have I, SUPPOSEDLY, twisted and/or distorted?
Which, AGAIN, MEANS that absolutely NO 'thing' existed BEFORE 'concepts' came into existence.
OF COURSE I stated the underlined statement, and you did NOT. This can be CLEARLY SEEN above.
Yeah I am able to see and understand your belief that what I said means what you said in the underlined statement.Age wrote: ↑Thu May 12, 2022 7:44 amOF COURSE I stated the underlined statement. This can be CLEARLY SEEN above.
What I was SAYING, and STATING, is that what you have SAID here MEANS what I STATED, and which you have underlined.
Are you NOT able to SEE nor UNDERSTAND this?
But I do NOT BELIEVE thatDontaskme wrote: ↑Thu May 12, 2022 7:58 amYeah I am able to see and understand your belief that what I said means what you said in the underlined statement.
It doesn't have to mean anything other than what it states.Age wrote: ↑Thu May 12, 2022 8:05 am
But I do NOT BELIEVE that
If what you STATED does NOT mean what I said, (in the underlined statement), then what does what you STATED MEAN, EXACTLY?
If 'concepts' did NOT exist BEFORE 'conceptual thinking' beings existed, then HOW, EXACTLY, could ALL the physical 'things' that would have OBVIOUSLY HAD TO EXISTED, existed?
AND what it STATES IS: There was absolutely NOTHING AT ALL existing BEFORE a conceptual thinking creature BECAME.Dontaskme wrote: ↑Thu May 12, 2022 8:56 amIt doesn't have to mean anything other than what it states.Age wrote: ↑Thu May 12, 2022 8:05 am
But I do NOT BELIEVE that
If what you STATED does NOT mean what I said, (in the underlined statement), then what does what you STATED MEAN, EXACTLY?
If 'concepts' did NOT exist BEFORE 'conceptual thinking' beings existed, then HOW, EXACTLY, could ALL the physical 'things' that would have OBVIOUSLY HAD TO EXISTED, existed?
Are you SUGGESTING here that what you SAID, WROTE, and STATED means absolutely NOTHING AT ALL?
I KNOW.
BUT 'things' do NOT exist as 'concepts' ONLY.
I NEVER talked about 'IF' 'concepts' did NOT exist BEFORE.
It does not state that at all...it is you that have added that statement onto what was not there before you put it there.
No I'm not suggesting anything of the sort, not at all, I'm stating that all ''things'' are known as ''concepts'' only.
Nope, for things to be known...things are always the concept of them.
You are welcome to say that the statement ''things'' exist as ''concepts'' only ...is wrong.Age wrote: ↑Thu May 12, 2022 1:13 pmI was just POINTING OUT that 'things' WERE existing BEFORE 'you', 'conceptual thinking', creatures and beings evolved into existence. Which is the VERY OPPOSITE of what you were STATING, and CLAIMING, was true.
I was just SHOWING HOW, WHERE, and WHY 'you' were Wrong here "dontaskme".