Skepdick wrote: ↑Sat Apr 04, 2020 8:02 am
bahman wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 9:39 pm
Yes, your program is non-deterministic but it is not free.
How do you test for "freedom"?
When I don't use any algorithm to decide. I can just decide discarding all preferences.
Skepdick wrote: ↑Sat Apr 04, 2020 8:02 am
How do you falsify "freedom"?
I cannot falsify it. There are time that I don't decide though and do thing according to preference.
Skepdick wrote: ↑Sat Apr 04, 2020 8:02 am
bahman wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 9:39 pm
No, I am not either thinking of minimising or maximising when I decide freely.
You could do it without a coin. I do it all the time.
You still haven't told me how and why you do it. If you don't know know how; and you don't know why - then why are you so sure you are doing it "freely" ?
I don't know how. I don't care why. I am just free.
Skepdick wrote: ↑Sat Apr 04, 2020 8:02 am
bahman wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 9:39 pm
There is no distance in integer number.
Then what is subtraction?
Subtracting tells you what is left, not distance, but amount. You have 5 apples, you eat 2, you are left by 3.
Skepdick wrote: ↑Sat Apr 04, 2020 8:02 am
bahman wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 9:39 pm
No. I was looking for how one can get a consistent mathematical framework that allows us the measurement at the same time explain how one can get continuum from infinitesimal.
What you are really asking is how one can get a "continuum" from discrete elements. The simple answer is - you can't.
Then how do you describe the reality that we experience. It appears continuous.
Skepdick wrote: ↑Sat Apr 04, 2020 8:02 am
Mathematics is discrete because language is discrete. On metaphysical level - language is discrete because time is discrete. Humans think in beginnings and ends. Physics is discrete because a "measurement" is an effect on the measurement apparatus caused by the thing being measured.
If physics was "continuous" you can't have things like "causes" and "effects" - you'll just have a function.
Yes. Physics at is core is discrete.