Ahh but it does...temporality (instability) is simply a gradation of stability itself. Take for existence the above example of -1. -1 is not a thing in and of itself but merely a gradation of 1 considering (-) is simply an observation of (+) and not a thing in itself.GreatandWiseTrixie wrote: ↑Sat Nov 04, 2017 4:01 pmThat is one of the flaws of logic, it does not account for temporalities.Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Sat Nov 04, 2017 3:42 pmThey are correct.marsh8472 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 08, 2015 12:07 am 1) The Law of Identity - An apple is an apple
2) The Law of Non-Contradiction - an apple is not a non-apple
3) The Law of Excluded Middle - it is either true or false that I just ate an apple
Can any of these be shown to be correct without referring back to them to do it?
They can be viewed as synonymous to:
1) The Law of Identity - An apple is an apple
a) Positive Value
b) stability in logical structure
c) 1 = 1
2) The Law of Non-Contradiction - an apple is not a non-apple
a) Negative value
b) absence of stability in logical structure
c) 1 ≠ -1
3) The Law of Excluded Middle - it is either true or false that I just ate an apple
a) Neutral value
b) synthesis of stability and non-stability
c) 0 = 1-1 or 0 is 1 and -1 or -1,0,1
For instance, is Peter happy or sad?
Maybe he's happy 1 minute, sad the next.
Or happy and sad at the same time.
Deficiency in structure is simply gradation, which is synonymous to temporarility.