The Nitty Gritty of Language
-
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2016 8:42 pm
- Location: Forms
The Nitty Gritty of Language
Language is a tool made by reason to understand things in reality. As new words are invented, things in reality can be articulated more clearly and profound. How language is separated from mere babble is the use of Reason that unlocks deeper meanings to that word, which can carry different yet interconnected meanings. That's language in a nutshell.
-
- Posts: 5621
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:39 am
Re: The Nitty Gritty of Language
For most of Homo Sapien's existence, there was no language. Language did eventually arise through an evolutionary process, but it wasn't exclusively through reasoning, e.g. echoing sounds. Reasoning played a predominant role in the later stages of Homo Sapien's existence.
PhilX
PhilX
-
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2016 8:42 pm
- Location: Forms
Re: The Nitty Gritty of Language
But surely they were conscious before language, which manifested reason. They couldn't have been just a bunch of dum-Duma playing with fire if there were prehistoric remains of art and tools and such.Philosophy Explorer wrote:For most of Homo Sapien's existence, there was no language. Language did eventually arise through an evolutionary process, but it wasn't exclusively through reasoning, e.g. echoing sounds. Reasoning played a predominant role in the later stages of Homo Sapien's existence.
PhilX
-
- Posts: 5621
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:39 am
Re: The Nitty Gritty of Language
That's an assumption that can't be confirmed. Art isn't reasoning and tools came relatively late in the history of HS. Being conscious doesn't imply reasoning as there are retarded HS that can't reason well or at all in present times.Sam I. Elle wrote:But surely they were conscious before language, which manifested reason. They couldn't have been just a bunch of dum-Duma playing with fire if there were prehistoric remains of art and tools and such.Philosophy Explorer wrote:For most of Homo Sapien's existence, there was no language. Language did eventually arise through an evolutionary process, but it wasn't exclusively through reasoning, e.g. echoing sounds. Reasoning played a predominant role in the later stages of Homo Sapien's existence.
PhilX
PhilX
- Trajk Logik
- Posts: 407
- Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2016 12:35 pm
Re: The Nitty Gritty of Language
Language is simply sounds and scribbles. You can only understand that these sounds and scribbles refer to, or represent, other things that aren't sounds and scribbles if you already understand the concept of representation - that things (symbols) can refer to other things. It seems to me that it is inherent of experiences themselves to be about things. There is an aboutness to my experiences. My experiences inform me of things. So my experiences are representations, or a model, of the world around me. This inherent aboutness to our experiences is what allows us humans to use symbolism as a form of communication - of using sounds and scribbles to refer to other things - like apples, chairs, and mothers - in order to communicate.
Re: The Nitty Gritty of Language
Evidence indicates that language predates HS.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/la ... s-language
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/la ... s-language
Re: The Nitty Gritty of Language
Circular logic and pure nonsense and babble!Sam I. Elle wrote:Language is a tool made by reason to understand things in reality. As new words are invented, things in reality can be articulated more clearly and profound. How language is separated from mere babble is the use of Reason that unlocks deeper meanings to that word, which can carry different yet interconnected meanings. That's language in a nutshell.
We have had language for thousands of years, with out really understanding reality, why we have had superstition for so very long, and only science would purge the superstition!
Re: The Nitty Gritty of Language
Language doesn't begin only with humans. It's been around long before that as animals, including humans, congregate into societies primitive or more advanced. If animals, long before humans existed, were able to communicate with each other by way of gesture and sound, it's obvious that humans expedited that kind of development. To ask when language came about is a futile question.
Re: The Nitty Gritty of Language
So what is the meaning of a word? You start off by suggesting the word refers to 'reality', but then you say its meaning is unlocked by 'reason' (and that there is more than one layer of meaning). 'Reality' is usually thought off as something 'out there', independent of us, but 'reason' is something that happens in my head. If words are about my understanding of reality, then there is no guarantee that my understanding of reality is necessarily a correct understanding; the words I invent and the meanings I unlock may simply be wrong. In other words, if language is a tool it isn't an effective one.Sam I. Elle wrote:Language is a tool made by reason to understand things in reality. As new words are invented, things in reality can be articulated more clearly and profound. How language is separated from mere babble is the use of Reason that unlocks deeper meanings to that word, which can carry different yet interconnected meanings. That's language in a nutshell.
-
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2016 8:42 pm
- Location: Forms
Re: The Nitty Gritty of Language
Yes, there are limits to our own understanding, but it can be effective if you're willing to be patient and find ways to expand beyond our limits.Londoner wrote:
So what is the meaning of a word? You start off by suggesting the word refers to 'reality', but then you say its meaning is unlocked by 'reason' (and that there is more than one layer of meaning). 'Reality' is usually thought off as something 'out there', independent of us, but 'reason' is something that happens in my head. If words are about my understanding of reality, then there is no guarantee that my understanding of reality is necessarily a correct understanding; the words I invent and the meanings I unlock may simply be wrong. In other words, if language is a tool it isn't an effective one.
Re: The Nitty Gritty of Language
We cannot expand beyond our limits.Sam I. Elle wrote: Yes, there are limits to our own understanding, but it can be effective if you're willing to be patient and find ways to expand beyond our limits.
Re: The Nitty Gritty of Language
I agree with Londoner that "reason is something that happens in my head". Language is often used as tool for instance when you use explicit instructions for assembling a television set. More often language is used to define and create reality. Since reality changes according to e.g. the weather, the season, and who happens to be the president of the US, the use of language both reflects and creates reality.Londoner wrote:So what is the meaning of a word? You start off by suggesting the word refers to 'reality', but then you say its meaning is unlocked by 'reason' (and that there is more than one layer of meaning). 'Reality' is usually thought off as something 'out there', independent of us, but 'reason' is something that happens in my head. If words are about my understanding of reality, then there is no guarantee that my understanding of reality is necessarily a correct understanding; the words I invent and the meanings I unlock may simply be wrong. In other words, if language is a tool it isn't an effective one.Sam I. Elle wrote:Language is a tool made by reason to understand things in reality. As new words are invented, things in reality can be articulated more clearly and profound. How language is separated from mere babble is the use of Reason that unlocks deeper meanings to that word, which can carry different yet interconnected meanings. That's language in a nutshell.
Re: The Nitty Gritty of Language
What do you propose are the limits to our own understanding. I, for One, certainly do not have any limits.Sam I. Elle wrote: ..., there are limits to our own understanding, but it can be effective if you're willing to be patient and find ways to expand beyond our limits.
Re: The Nitty Gritty of Language
No, it's I who do not have any limits
Re: The Nitty Gritty of Language
So true.Belinda wrote:No, it's I who do not have any limits