If you took more care to read what I am saying and not what you think I am saying then your flabber would not be so gasted.AMod wrote:chaz wyman,chaz wyman wrote:Over the years that I have contributed to this site, many intelligent people have come and gone, some I have recognised moved to better sites. It's a shame we can't keep them interested here.
I find myself flabbergasted that you cannot recognise your own behaviour as a source of such things.
Why not spend some time on the site I mentioned before your prejudice gets in the way?AMod wrote: What you call 'better' is subjective I think and from visiting the other sites I find they tend to express a sameness to their discussions. As from the look of them I assume their moderators censor both bad language and any behaviour or thoughts that they fundamentally disagree with.
I seem to remember "Typist" sabotaging a thread I had started and you did not follow any of my requests at the time.AMod wrote: I thought I made it abundantly clear that if the owner of a post requests a change to the thread I will seriously consider it. So your intelligent people can have the thread they wish if they can be bothered to police it. I'd even lock it if they thought it had run its course.
Such an observation is pathetically academic as it is well known that you do fuck all in the way of moderation, that things already get well out of hand before they beg you to help, which you refuse.AMod wrote: That most of the complaints I get are from those that tend to behave badly upon anothers OP is just one of the ironies I've discovered whilst being a Mod.
You ought to be ashamed to be a moderator on this Forum.
The only irony is that you are basing your irony on a state of affairs which could be better if only you were more interested and attentive to the desire to build a better forum.
You can hardly pillory bad behaviour which your rules find acceptable.
Think about it!