Beyond Reasonable Doubt?

So what's really going on?

Moderators: AMod, iMod

chaz wyman
Posts: 5304
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 7:31 pm

Re: Beyond Reasonable Doubt?

Post by chaz wyman »

attofishpi wrote:
chaz wyman wrote:Problem with you is that you are too scared to say anything because everything you have written so far is fucking bollocks.
This whole thread is a piece of shit and it has come out of you.

SINAI ?!?!?

You fucking moron!
I dont fuck morons but thanks for the offer.

I am the only one here going point for point. If i am so far off the mark (ooo sooo scared) why are YOU avoiding my points?

Do you always spit the dummy like a big baby when you cant win an argument?

Since you obviously lack the skills of basic comprehension, i will point out there are TWO questions here.
You are on your own.
User avatar
attofishpi
Posts: 10588
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 8:10 am
Location: Orion Spur
Contact:

Re: Beyond Reasonable Doubt?

Post by attofishpi »

chaz wyman wrote:You are on your own.
You have really surprised me here chaz. :(

You said you were gonna ridicule me...alas nothing.
Thundril
Posts: 347
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2011 9:37 pm
Location: Cardiff

Re: Beyond Reasonable Doubt?

Post by Thundril »

attofishpi wrote:
John Kelly wrote: Because god spelled backwards is dog.
No, you need to go one step further.... There is a saying that '..a mans best friend is a dog'
So what is God?
A friend's best man?
Thundril
Posts: 347
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2011 9:37 pm
Location: Cardiff

Re: Beyond Reasonable Doubt?

Post by Thundril »

attofishpi wrote:
Is God...panentheistic in nature?

Beyond Reasonable Doubt? ...an unnatural etymology revealed...

http://www.androcies.com
Atto; I took a glimpse inside. Not all that impressed.
The one-time Catholic theologian Mary Daly does a much more vibrant job of reconstructing English etymology to make manifest the mystical potential she perceived therein.
See, for example, Gyn/ecology, or The Websters' Wickedary. Or her first major work, the revolutionary Beyond God the Father.
User avatar
attofishpi
Posts: 10588
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 8:10 am
Location: Orion Spur
Contact:

Re: Beyond Reasonable Doubt?

Post by attofishpi »

Thundril wrote:
attofishpi wrote:
Is God...panentheistic in nature?

Beyond Reasonable Doubt? ...an unnatural etymology revealed...

http://www.androcies.com
Atto; I took a glimpse inside. Not all that impressed.
The one-time Catholic theologian Mary Daly does a much more vibrant job of reconstructing English etymology to make manifest the mystical potential she perceived therein.
See, for example, Gyn/ecology, or The Websters' Wickedary. Or her first major work, the revolutionary Beyond God the Father.
Thanks Thundril. I need to find some time this week to have a look at that, sounds interesting.
User avatar
attofishpi
Posts: 10588
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 8:10 am
Location: Orion Spur
Contact:

Re: Beyond Reasonable Doubt?

Post by attofishpi »

Thundril wrote:The one-time Catholic theologian Mary Daly does a much more vibrant job of reconstructing English etymology to make manifest the mystical potential she perceived therein.
See, for example, Gyn/ecology, or The Websters' Wickedary. Or her first major work, the revolutionary Beyond God the Father.
Cant say im finding a whole lot, without being forced to buy stuff on Amazon. Do you have any quotes you might like to post?
lancek4
Posts: 1131
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2010 5:50 pm

Re: Beyond Reasonable Doubt?

Post by lancek4 »

I find your art interesting. I would set aside the 'what if AI god' thing as science fiction; but sf is fun though.

I would put the interesting peculiarities in the category of consciousness functioning as it does to know the world. If you want to say evidence of God, great for you. I say that any God that I cannot interact with is unnecessary. If there is a god behind the scenes then he/it needs none of my attention for I am already doing It's will. Only a personal god has my attention, and then has no need to point out universal niftiness to get it, for we would likewise already be interacting.
User avatar
attofishpi
Posts: 10588
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 8:10 am
Location: Orion Spur
Contact:

Re: Beyond Reasonable Doubt?

Post by attofishpi »

lancek4 wrote:I find your art interesting. I would set aside the 'what if AI god' thing as science fiction; but sf is fun though.

I would put the interesting peculiarities in the category of consciousness functioning as it does to know the world. If you want to say evidence of God, great for you. I say that any God that I cannot interact with is unnecessary. If there is a god behind the scenes then he/it needs none of my attention for I am already doing It's will. Only a personal god has my attention, and then has no need to point out universal niftiness to get it, for we would likewise already be interacting.
Fair comment lance...the God i have is very interactive, hence why i am not a pantheist.
User avatar
attofishpi
Posts: 10588
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 8:10 am
Location: Orion Spur
Contact:

Re: Beyond Reasonable Doubt?

Post by attofishpi »

SpheresOfBalance wrote:
Notvacka wrote:Nice. And perfectly in line with my view, if you think about it. :)

The universe would exist within God, not the other way around. God would not be part of the universe, rather the universe would be part of God.
Yes I was really just countering the word 'outside,' because in my assertion it (creator), 'is' it (universe), only expanded. Further I see that it could be that the constituents that form our minds and consciousness (elements/compounds and electromagnetic energy) are the same as it's, which is why we have them in the first place, such that we are one in the same, yet somehow removed from it, as individuals, of it's intention.
Panentheists...hello???
User avatar
attofishpi
Posts: 10588
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 8:10 am
Location: Orion Spur
Contact:

Re: Beyond Reasonable Doubt?

Post by attofishpi »

SpheresOfBalance wrote:
attofishpi wrote:Is GOD an AI? How unlikely is it that the very location where GOD advised us to abide by some commandments can be broken down to SIN AI...?
You've got to be kidding, right?

Are those the original characters, as used in the language, as it was coined?

If so, maybe it's true that...

...Artificial Intelligence is a SIN, watch out for AI, one day it shall come and take over the world! Yes the 3 Arnold Schwarzenegger movies about The Terminator, are actually the newest chapters in revelation written and directed by GOD through various humans.

Let's at least keep them in order:

SIN is Artificial Intelligence
SIN is Anti Intuitive
SIN is Altogether Ingenious
SIN is Altogether Iconoclastic

I believe you're grasping for straws such that:

Such Ignorance Negates All Intellect


Wait, I guess you're correct, he could be an artificial god after all!
Is that the extent of your wit? As it stands it hasn't an ounce of comprehension.
Post Reply