Male Interviolence
-
- Posts: 5304
- Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 7:31 pm
Re: Male Interviolence
In the old days...
Women and children first goes the saying at times of trouble such as getting the life-boats filled.
This is just another code for saying that women are like children and not capable of looking after themselves.
These days women are members of the police and get shot like male police.
Women and children first goes the saying at times of trouble such as getting the life-boats filled.
This is just another code for saying that women are like children and not capable of looking after themselves.
These days women are members of the police and get shot like male police.
Re: Male Interviolence
you would not normally see this in my neck of the woodsreasonvemotion wrote:I have seen men forcibily push women aside and keep pushing until they get a seat on the train. Meanwhile the women stare in wonderment at each other, like, is this guy for real. Women hold no special place in this world for men. According to your sex, or more likely you, as it appears you seem to suffer from some sort of "rejection", your attitude is......" it is them or us".
at least in public even the hardcore rednecks are polite to women
-
- Posts: 200
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2012 7:28 pm
- Location: mom's basement
Re: Male Interviolence
Bullshit. they are a privileged class..you have women in the police force,fire departments & the military and get paid all the benefits & retire earlier ,doing only a fraction of the work the guys do..chaz wyman wrote:In the old days...
Women and children first goes the saying at times of trouble such as getting the life-boats filled.
This is just another code for saying that women are like children and not capable of looking after themselves.
These days women are members of the police and get shot like male police.
-
- Posts: 5304
- Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 7:31 pm
Re: Male Interviolence
Please cite your evidence!johngalthasspoken wrote:Bullshit. they are a privileged class..you have women in the police force,fire departments & the military and get paid all the benefits & retire earlier ,doing only a fraction of the work the guys do..chaz wyman wrote:In the old days...
Women and children first goes the saying at times of trouble such as getting the life-boats filled.
This is just another code for saying that women are like children and not capable of looking after themselves.
These days women are members of the police and get shot like male police.
Here is something you might like to consider - but I doubt you will.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glass_ceiling
http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2011/ ... s-top-jobs
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender_inequality
http://listverse.com/2008/11/20/10-extr ... nequality/
What I think is that you are covering for your own inadequacies by blaming your career failure on women, rather than looking to your own limitations.
-
- Posts: 200
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2012 7:28 pm
- Location: mom's basement
Re: Male Interviolence
douchebag, evidence is everywhere , watch this, he's a smart Brit .chaz wyman wrote: Please cite your evidence!
Policeman and Policewoman: is it the same job : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YQUYME_bYuI&feature=plcp
Female Soldiers: Asset or Liability : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CSb-ok65KGI&feature=plcp
female fire fighters in action : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ERwzqvs7vvU&feature=plcp
yup,men like yourself are the most vehemently feminist, it's the only way they get sexually noticed.
chaz wyman wrote:What I think is that you are covering for your own inadequacies by blaming your career failure on women, rather than looking to your own limitations.
-
- Posts: 5304
- Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 7:31 pm
Re: Male Interviolence
johngalthasspoken wrote:douchebag, evidence is everywhere , watch this, he's a smart Brit .chaz wyman wrote: Please cite your evidence!
Policeman and Policewoman: is it the same job : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YQUYME_bYuI&feature=plcp
This is not evidence, but a childish rant from a pathetic looser like yourself.
Female Soldiers: Asset or Liability : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CSb-ok65KGI&feature=plcp
Is this the same looser - I think so
female fire fighters in action : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ERwzqvs7vvU&feature=plcp
yup,men like yourself are the most vehemently feminist, it's the only way they get sexually noticed.
This is not evidence.
chaz wyman wrote:What I think is that you are covering for your own inadequacies by blaming your career failure on women, rather than looking to your own limitations.
QED. You are an inadequate boy.
Re: Male Interviolence
i did paintball a couple of times over the summer
one time the teams got split along gender lines - boys vs girls
the girls totally kicked ass
the boys just totally sucked at cooperating
i would rather have a girl backing me up in a firefight than a guy - a view that is shared by a lot of guys i know
one time the teams got split along gender lines - boys vs girls
the girls totally kicked ass
the boys just totally sucked at cooperating
i would rather have a girl backing me up in a firefight than a guy - a view that is shared by a lot of guys i know
-
- Posts: 200
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2012 7:28 pm
- Location: mom's basement
Re: Male Interviolence
dear moron, it is a well known fact that female police officers/fire fighters/military personal are paid equally with same benefits for less work.chaz wyman wrote: This is not evidence, but a childish rant from a pathetic looser like yourself.
says the half-wit school teacher. peasantchaz wyman wrote: QED. You are an inadequate boy.[/color]
Re: Male Interviolence
Beta males suffer from the "white knight" syndrome. Basically, these pathetic pussies, like cheeze wineman, need to lie constantly to promote matriarchy. This is an appeal, to women, to trade protection for pussy. By protecting and serving the pussy, these white knights hope to achieve sexual favor, by appealing directly to the pussy.
Men who do not do this, who either fail to appeal, or reject outright, become dangerous and "evil" men. These are the "black knight" males. These are criminal types, physically aggressive, physically intimidating, alpha males, who will rape or even kill, at their whim. These are the more dangerous types of males, and these types are scrutinized and hated by Jews and Christians, because they don't share their feminist values. Basically, this second half of men, are portraying more risk in life, as they can be sent to jail, their lifestyles are criminalized, and we are getting to the point of obvious thought crime.
To question the Judeo-Christian standard, of putting women and children above men, you can be convicted of thought crimes, you will be silenced, censored, banished, exiled, or worse. To put men above the value of women and children, to promote patriarchal values, is called "extremism", fundamentalism, terrorism, or worse, a criminal act. These so called "philosophy forums" are liberal, and actually side with Judeo-Christianity. So truth is silenced, regarding this subject and topic.
But, truth will prevail. Truth cannot be silenced forever. Putting men above the value of women and children, occurs in patriarchal systems. The current, dominant patriarchal system, is the spread of Islam, who has God/Allah on their side. When God is on the side of Islam, then their culture is strong, and will continue to spread. What are they spreading? They are spreading "hate". This is what the liberals, Jews and Christians, will accuse.
To put men above the value of women and children, is "hateful". Why? Because the truth is, women and children have more value than men, in Western societies. A woman's life has more intrinsic, automatic value than a man, simply by being born.
A daughter is worth more, in money and social value, than a son. Having a son is shameful, and even dangerous in Judeo-Christian societies.
Consider this.
Bill Clinton had one daughter.
George W. Bush had two daughters.
Barrack Obama had two daughters.
Where are the sons?
This proves everything I've said. Sons and male heirs are devalued, and a great risk, in postmodern, Judeo-Christian societies. Men have lesser value than women in these societies. This is going to be a major part of the west and eastern cultural conflicts, with respect to these Crusades and Jihad just flaring up now. It will get much worse within the next few years. To prepare yourselves, you should know the differences between these cultures. Islam will appeal to men, in general, because it is a strong religion which appeals to alpha males, and putting the value of men above women.
This means the masculine gender, as a whole, will be appealed to.
For Jews and Christians, women will be appealed to.
This Crusade concerns a large factor of understanding the differences in human gender.
Jews like cheeze wineman, and Christians, can no longer deny that western society values women and children above the intrinsic value of men. A daughter has more value, by default, than having a son. To teach "equality", in the face of this too obvious fact, is a vicious lie. And it is a lie that ought to be punished heavily, with great contempt and hatred. To preach equality, when it is a great lie, is about as anti-philosophical as anybody can possibly imagine.
Men who do not do this, who either fail to appeal, or reject outright, become dangerous and "evil" men. These are the "black knight" males. These are criminal types, physically aggressive, physically intimidating, alpha males, who will rape or even kill, at their whim. These are the more dangerous types of males, and these types are scrutinized and hated by Jews and Christians, because they don't share their feminist values. Basically, this second half of men, are portraying more risk in life, as they can be sent to jail, their lifestyles are criminalized, and we are getting to the point of obvious thought crime.
To question the Judeo-Christian standard, of putting women and children above men, you can be convicted of thought crimes, you will be silenced, censored, banished, exiled, or worse. To put men above the value of women and children, to promote patriarchal values, is called "extremism", fundamentalism, terrorism, or worse, a criminal act. These so called "philosophy forums" are liberal, and actually side with Judeo-Christianity. So truth is silenced, regarding this subject and topic.
But, truth will prevail. Truth cannot be silenced forever. Putting men above the value of women and children, occurs in patriarchal systems. The current, dominant patriarchal system, is the spread of Islam, who has God/Allah on their side. When God is on the side of Islam, then their culture is strong, and will continue to spread. What are they spreading? They are spreading "hate". This is what the liberals, Jews and Christians, will accuse.
To put men above the value of women and children, is "hateful". Why? Because the truth is, women and children have more value than men, in Western societies. A woman's life has more intrinsic, automatic value than a man, simply by being born.
A daughter is worth more, in money and social value, than a son. Having a son is shameful, and even dangerous in Judeo-Christian societies.
Consider this.
Bill Clinton had one daughter.
George W. Bush had two daughters.
Barrack Obama had two daughters.
Where are the sons?
This proves everything I've said. Sons and male heirs are devalued, and a great risk, in postmodern, Judeo-Christian societies. Men have lesser value than women in these societies. This is going to be a major part of the west and eastern cultural conflicts, with respect to these Crusades and Jihad just flaring up now. It will get much worse within the next few years. To prepare yourselves, you should know the differences between these cultures. Islam will appeal to men, in general, because it is a strong religion which appeals to alpha males, and putting the value of men above women.
This means the masculine gender, as a whole, will be appealed to.
For Jews and Christians, women will be appealed to.
This Crusade concerns a large factor of understanding the differences in human gender.
Jews like cheeze wineman, and Christians, can no longer deny that western society values women and children above the intrinsic value of men. A daughter has more value, by default, than having a son. To teach "equality", in the face of this too obvious fact, is a vicious lie. And it is a lie that ought to be punished heavily, with great contempt and hatred. To preach equality, when it is a great lie, is about as anti-philosophical as anybody can possibly imagine.
Re: Male Interviolence
Oh come on. Women are killed all the time and no one makes a peep about it. A big deal was made out of this because they were police officers, not because they were women.Atthet wrote:It's evil to kill women and children, but if the police officers were men, then it wouldn't be such a big fuss. It's only "evil" to murder women and children, we all know this, thanks to Judaism.
-
- Posts: 5304
- Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 7:31 pm
Re: Male Interviolence
It is a well know fact that women are overlooked for promotion to jobs they are better qualified to do.johngalthasspoken wrote:dear moron, it is a well known fact that female police officers/fire fighters/military personal are paid equally with same benefits for less work.chaz wyman wrote: This is not evidence, but a childish rant from a pathetic looser like yourself.
says the half-wit school teacher. peasantchaz wyman wrote: QED. You are an inadequate boy.[/color]
Re: Male Interviolence
A reasonable question but no.johngalthasspoken wrote:Lynn - are you the same Lynn on satyr's forum ?