Women who run with wolves

[chaz wyman]

Can I remind the posters here that the terms of use of this Forum are as follows:

"You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, sexually-orientated or any other material that may violate any laws be it of your country, the country where “Philosophy Now Forum” is hosted or International Law. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned, with notification of your Internet Service Provider if deemed required by us. The IP address of all posts are recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. You agree that “Philosophy Now Forum” have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic at any time should we see fit. As a user you agree to any information you have entered to being stored in a database. While this information will not be disclosed to any third party without your consent, neither “Philosophy Now Forum” nor phpBB shall be held responsible for any hacking attempt that may lead to the data being compromised. ""

Even America has "Hate Speech" laws.

[johngalthasspoken]

Even America has "Hate Speech" laws.

wishful thinking, many institutions do impose speech codes, but whenever challenged,they get crushed in the supreme court as it violates the first amendment

[vegetariantaxidermy]

Can I remind the posters here that the terms of use of this Forum are as follows:

"You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, sexually-orientated or any other material that may violate any laws be it of your country, the country where “Philosophy Now Forum” is hosted or International Law. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned, with notification of your Internet Service Provider if deemed required by us. The IP address of all posts are recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. You agree that “Philosophy Now Forum” have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic at any time should we see fit. As a user you agree to any information you have entered to being stored in a database. While this information will not be disclosed to any third party without your consent, neither “Philosophy Now Forum” nor phpBB shall be held responsible for any hacking attempt that may lead to the data being compromised. ""

Even America has "Hate Speech" laws.

@chaz I was quoting jongalhasspoken. If you look back you will see what the reason was.

[vegetariantaxidermy]

Even America has "Hate Speech" laws.

wishful thinking, many institutions do impose speech codes, but whenever challenged,they get crushed in the supreme court as it violates the first amendment

I don't like the term 'hate speech'. We already have laws for slander, libel, threats etc. 'Hate speech' is too vague and politically correct. Same goes for 'hate crime'. Crime is crime. I don't think anyone rapes or murders someone because they love them.

[vegetariantaxidermy]

True that, but it's not vital that a woman must provide for herself..you can easily get a guy to do that for ya.but it's not the same for a man,if he's not financially stable,no woman would breath in his direction ,unless he's got Brad Pitt looks.

Equal pay for men and women working is even more ludicrous after accepting this basic fact. If it's unnecessary for a beautiful woman to work, and it actually is unnecessary, then shouldn't men be paid much more for, since a man's work is necessary?

A beautiful woman always has the option, the default position, of spreading her legs wide, for money. Men never have this option. Men never have the easiest and most obvious backup plan available, based on gender. Genders are naturally unequal, and never will be equal.

So why treat unequal genders as equals? Why pay women the same as men, when women already have an advantage from the beginning?

To throw another wrench into this equation, women don't want to be called "sluts" or "whores", when they do spread their legs wide open? Women don't want to be called out on what they are, essentially, biologically, naturally. Women hate being exposed, with truth, for how simple and stupid they are, individually.

Women in groups can be fierce, intimidating, and display some form of intellect. Women isolated, as individuals, are weak, stupid, boring, and weaker than the weakest types of men. Women are not individuals. Women are against individuality. Women cannot find strength alone. The entire strength of a woman, by instinct, is her dependency on others, be them men or other women. Women are the inferior gender, individually.

Are you turning yourself on here?

[chaz wyman]

Even America has "Hate Speech" laws.

wishful thinking, many institutions do impose speech codes, but whenever challenged,they get crushed in the supreme court as it violates the first amendment

But the Host Nation of phpBB is the UK.

[Atthet]

Yes, the thought of pursuing a group of girls, separating one from her herd, cornering, and trapping her, does excite me. It excites me to sniff and pursue fresh meat, the unbloodied and unpentrated, virgin territory of a female. Her fear only excites a man further, to do what is in the nature of men to do to young girls.

Women are nothing after separating them from their herd, their liberalism, their civilization and institutions, their societies and families. Women are weak, and easy to penetrate, after this barrier is crossed. This "modern day woman", this "feminist" type described by allemotion noreason, is a joke. It's pathetic to hear it, especially from the mouth of a woman. A woman, claiming that she is independent and individualistic? This is proof of a woman's ability to lie to herself, to comfort herself, to delude herself into an idealism more powerful than any man can dream up, including man's dream of God. A woman's delusion is twice as strong, and twice as stupid.

Independent?
Woman?

These terms do not compute, together. They cannot be added. The very essence of a woman, is to spread her legs to the dominant male, and there is nothing more to her than this. All that she is, is what a man adds, inserts, between her legs, and in between her brain cells, whether she is willing to accept it, or not.

That is reality.

[The Voice of Time]

doesn't sexual harassment in the US and racism cover vocal speech and written communication?

[johngalthasspoken]

doesn't sexual harassment in the US and racism cover vocal speech and written communication?

only if you threaten with physical violence..In the UK,they recently arrested a kid for posting a tweet using ethnic slurs describing a Negro football player.it wouldn't happen here.

[The Voice of Time]

doesn't sexual harassment in the US and racism cover vocal speech and written communication?

only if you threaten with physical violence..In the UK,they recently arrested a kid for posting a tweet using ethnic slurs describing a Negro football player.it wouldn't happen here.

So you are allowed to create an atmosphere that bullies women for being women and to make them feel bad about themselves to undermine their self-esteem so that they can be easier bullied or mentally abused or easily lured to unsatisfactory sex?

Wow... what a country.

[johngalthasspoken]

So you are allowed to create an atmosphere that bullies women for being women and to make them feel bad about themselves to undermine their self-esteem so that they can be easier bullied or mentally abused or easily lured to unsatisfactory sex?

Wow... what a country.

I hope your being sarcastic here.

[reasonvemotion]

Yes, the thought of pursuing a group of girls, separating one from her herd, cornering, and trapping her, does excite me. It excites me to sniff and pursue fresh meat, the unbloodied and unpentrated, virgin territory of a female. Her fear only excites a man further, to do what is in the nature of men to do to young girls.

Take this thing back to Burma.

[reasonvemotion]

Women who are self sufficient are threats to an obsolete species such as Atthet.

All he has to offer is sex without the male power. Some women want more than "meat".

[vegetariantaxidermy]

Yes, the thought of pursuing a group of girls, separating one from her herd, cornering, and trapping her, does excite me. It excites me to sniff and pursue fresh meat, the unbloodied and unpentrated, virgin territory of a female. Her fear only excites a man further, to do what is in the nature of men to do to young girls.

Women are nothing after separating them from their herd, their liberalism, their civilization and institutions, their societies and families. Women are weak, and easy to penetrate, after this barrier is crossed. This "modern day woman", this "feminist" type described by allemotion noreason, is a joke. It's pathetic to hear it, especially from the mouth of a woman. A woman, claiming that she is independent and individualistic? This is proof of a woman's ability to lie to herself, to comfort herself, to delude herself into an idealism more powerful than any man can dream up, including man's dream of God. A woman's delusion is twice as strong, and twice as stupid.

Independent?
Woman?

These terms do not compute, together. They cannot be added. The very essence of a woman, is to spread her legs to the dominant male, and there is nothing more to her than this. All that she is, is what a man adds, inserts, between her legs, and in between her brain cells, whether she is willing to accept it, or not.

That is reality.

Would you like to hear a man talk about your daughter like that? Sick fuck.

[ForgedinHell]

doesn't sexual harassment in the US and racism cover vocal speech and written communication?

only if you threaten with physical violence..In the UK,they recently arrested a kid for posting a tweet using ethnic slurs describing a Negro football player.it wouldn't happen here.

So you are allowed to create an atmosphere that bullies women for being women and to make them feel bad about themselves to undermine their self-esteem so that they can be easier bullied or mentally abused or easily lured to unsatisfactory sex?

Wow... what a country.

There is no absolute free speech protection for sexual harassment. No threats have to be made, at least regarding physical violence, for a sexual harassment claim. In fact, they are difficult claims to make, depending on the state, and even unwanted touching that occurs repeatedly may not be sufficient for an harassment case. Each federal circuit interprets the laws differently, and while the US Supreme Court has set forth a minimal standard, not every federal district's appellate division sees it that way.

The same is true with ethnic slurs in the work place, that may establish a Title VII violation without any need for a physical threat.