Philosophy Now Forum

For the discussion of all things philosophical, especially articles in the magazine Philosophy Now.
It is currently Wed Jun 19, 2013 1:06 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 97 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Age of Faggots
PostPosted: Sun Jun 21, 2009 5:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:14 pm
Posts: 846
There is the Human Animal, its Individuality on one hand.

There is the Human Tribe, its Sociality on the other hand.


Only-Man-himself can become an "individual" because women are nothing without the strength of numbers behind their backs. Women are physically-incapable of engaging Reason and Philosophy. It is an *IMPOSSIBILITY* for a Woo-man to know such things as these because these concepts are *NOT* based upon Emotion/Feeling (while women are incapable of knowing anything more than Emotion/Feeling). In terms of Human History, women have been kept out of Male-dominated Warfare for their own general safety and stupidity. Up to this current point in time, the Human Tribe is one defined by the fact that men have defended his tribes territories, borders, and walls from encroaching invaders. But exactly-who is Man protecting except his defenseless, pretty-little-pussies? (and he owns them as sexual-objects to abate his own sexual needs & desires) There is nobody else and there is nothing else. Without women, Man has no vagina to store his genetic seed. His kind would go extinct without a womb to house his sons & daughters. So this has been for centuries, millenniums, and Æons passed. Man has lived as Father, Elder, Chieftain, Leader, King, and even the God of His tribe. It is his singular vanity & ego that keeps the peace, its stability, and defines the particular peoples through his Individuality. Again, let it be known that women absolutely-have *NO* ounce of Individuality inside of them.

Imagine this: You are an early human male, a wild animal. Your particular Human Tribe is on the brink of Extinction. The predominant causes for your tribes trouble are 1) sexual inbreeding, caused by rampant Hedonism and Moral Decadence (resulting in extensive social retardation and recessive diseases), and 2) unusual-seasonal shifts in weather, including droughts & famine caused by Global Warming (?), which have destroyed your planted crops and moved your hunting game to a distant area where-in-which another tribe of strong warriors defends their territory. Your tribes soldiers have become weakened through famine. The tribal chief has released the last of your food stores. Not long from now, all members of your tribe will starve to death. To keep the food stores up, your tribe practices infanticide on its retarded newborns. There are hardly-any healthy newborns born anymore (due to excessive inbreeding). Thus a feeling of Social Nihilism befalls your community & family. Suicide and Depression becomes commonplace. You often go out to hunt alone because your tribes warriors must fend off attacks from neighboring clans. Word has already-spread throughout the neighboring territories that your land is on the brink of collapse. The foreigners are gathering their forces to swoop in and build over the bones of your failed existence.

Imagine further: What will you do, you early human male??? There is a chance for your Salvation! A band of several wild human females happens to cross your territory. While hunting, and failing to find any game, you observe these female animals. You run back to your tribe to report your finding. A hunting/warrior party is sent out and they are captured. Your tribe has been saved and *YOU* are the hero!!! Your chief orders the *RAPE* of these females which you and the other hunters/warriors carry-out with glee. Your chieftain also orders a trade with a bordering tribe...a few of these women are traded (as sex-objects) in-exchange for food stores. Thus you are your tribes salvation! ~Congratulations Hero! For the next few years, the seasonal weather shifts back and your harvests regrow as plentiful as ever before! The hunting game also returns. With the fresh blood your tribe has inherited, you-yourself eventually-are made into a Clan Elder! In a decisive move, you regrow the strength of your tribes warriors and lead several successful raiding parties against foreign territories. In the years to follow, you develop techniques of Conquest and ultimately-become a local Warlord. You are praised by your friends and feared by your enemies. You are a Success!


Such was life centuries ago when Mankind was Free to live his life as an Individual.

And the same applies today...albeit abstracted into a new form of survival and existence.

The point I desired to make in the above example of tribal life, and probably-did make, was that human females are sexual objects, not by my own *CHOICE* in life, but by Necessity. It is not a matter of my "misogyny", "sexism", or "racism" that makes my example both a Realistic and Actual one. What makes my explanation *TRUE* is that it can be doubted on the basis of *FEMALE WEAKNESS*. In other words, what was the circumstance that caused several human female animals to be gathered and traveling alone??? Was that not a strange occurrence??? Yes, it was. Because, as I have been making my points thus far, it is completely-recognizable that Women are weak, pathetic, and stupid pussies (compared to men). They are passive objects. And despite their claims that they can emotionally-manipulate men, which they can, that does not assuage the fact that Man is King, and Woman is his tool, his sex-object, which can be easily-replaced on *HIS* terms. But despite all of my factual-reasoning, yes, there can still be instances of Patriarchical and Matriarchical Socialities. However, the difference between a Kings rule, compared to a Queens rule, is a matter of Night & Day. During *HARD* times, or times when circumstances actually-threaten the immediate survival of a particular Sociality, a strong King is best fit to lead. A Queen, on the other hand, is best fit during times of Superficiality, Peace, and when there are no *TRUE* dangers to the Sociality.

A King rules in War; a Queen rules in Peace. It is quite simple.

Using the above logic, it should be easy for everybody to see, no matter how mentally-retarded you may be (as a Liberal or Socialist), that men can be independent and individualistic although women can never be so. And why not? Well, as Human History clearly-displays to us on a daily basis, men are physically-stronger and larger than women on average. For thousands-upon-thousands of years, men were *BRED* for hunting and warring while women were stuck at home doing stupid and trivial things...like sewing, gathering, and rearing children. But how *DIFFICULT* are those things??? I can tell you with no uncertainty that those things are *EASY* compared to facing down a lions roar and having it rip your chest open with its claws. Hunters/Warriors/Men have always-made the *TRUE* sacrifices for their Sociality or Tribe. Women have done just about nothing except bear children. That is their one saving grace and that truly-is all they are good for. Here are some thoughts as further examples...can a Woman have a good/stimulating *INTELLECTUAL* conversation with a Man? The answer is: No, they cannot. Because women are stupid; they *COPY* the works of Philosophers (who are white men...no coincidence). All a woman knows how to do is dance, play, and have a "fun time" while she is young. Women, and Feminized Men (for example), are *CAREFREE*. In other words, the girls and the faggots/playboys go out to "play" and that is all their lives are good for. They shun Sacrifice and then wonder *WHY* the world falls apart around them when the walls of their Sociality crumble, and eventually-collapse all around them.

The awaiting hordes are bloodthirsty, ready to impale the faggot asses with long pikes and rape all the pretty, stupid little girls into submission.

This is not *ME* talking...this is Reality speaking up for me!


So what I want to ask people, even though nobody on this forum is intelligent enough to hold a decent conversation with me, why women cannot be "individuals"? Is it because women are stupid...or another reason? Is it because women have no dick & balls? I think that reason is most-likely-true. Women have no Testosterone coursing through their veins, like men do, so the result of this is their pacification to Life & Death in general. Furthermore, in times of Decline and Moral Decadence, the sheltering affect of Decline places a great burden of stupidity, laziness, and general indolence on the minds of women and feminized men in a particular culture (i.e. Amerikas Non-culture). Their pacification is then overloaded with Estrogen and feminine chemicals...through biological predispositions. And all of these factors are produced in-and-by Nature-herself, who knows no end to her own Cruelty. Women have *PENIS ENVY* and there can be no doubt in Freud, because, women have no say or scope regarding their own Future. They are momentary...living in the moment...and cannot see past the limits (i.e. event horizons) as set forth there by men.

Who has some *BALLS* to argue their point against this one that I pose to everybody?

Who has a voice to silence my apparent "Conservatism" against your pathetic, failed "Liberal" ideologies?

Who wants to merely-attempt to disprove any of my claims!?


But in an Age of Faggots, I expect no opposition to the above propositions. I will continue to say what I will without recourse.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Age of Faggots
PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 10:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:14 pm
Posts: 846
apaosha wrote:
Women are generally weaker and less assertive as a direct result of their biological role in the human social unit as carers for children; this role demands a heavy sense of duty and responsibility and may limit imagination and the capacity to challenge authority or the status quo.

And I think even the best philosophers and wise men underestimate how deep this vein of "feeling" runs down.

You are speaking about 1,000,000+ years of human evolution and genetic biology.

So it just hits me in the face when the stupid bitches around philosophy websites hyper-actively-contradict themselves.


apaosha wrote:
Whereas men have the role as warriors who through competition get to fuck as many women as possible and ensure a superior generation. This role also demands certain other traits.

This is hunter-gatherer archetype, though, and speaks in generalities. This does not preclude the possibility of "masculine" women or "effeminate" men.

Does it not concern you what kind of man is permitted to breed by "modern" society?

It does concern my thinking.

I know that the "feminized men" and cripples are kept around to do woman's work.

Now, the 21st Century has exasperated this by an incredible magnitude. This forum is a prime example of feminization...

...where feminized men like Duncan Butlin must fight for "Mens Rights". It is pathetic, and sad.


apaosha wrote:
An effeminized man makes an ideal Citizen. Or slave. Should men want primacy, the State must fall. Satyr has gone on at length about Institutions becoming the abstracted Alpha-male authority figure, reducing everyone to a submissive position, thus ensuring that the establishment remains unchallenged.

Decadence always comes after too long a peacetime. General anarchy and turbulence is required before new tribes, new organizations, new peoples can emerge.

French Revolution for example. A decaying, corrupt country threw off its monarchical traditions, reinvented itself, and under Napoleon conquered most of Europe. Something like the Grand Armee would not have been possible under the previous society.

Hmmm.. So its a sort of cycle, perhaps? A culture/people/nation comes to dominate its neighbours, goes through a period of supremacy and then slowly declines as its people become weak and complacent and take their soft, protected lives for granted.

Roman Empire, as well ...

History is priming us for an Amerikan Empire. The walls are coming down. It is just a matter of time now...

Personally-speaking, I wonder how long the Amerikan Empire will last before it breaks into two.


apaosha wrote:
Or, you could open up new frontiers, such as Mars or something, and govern yourself in these deserted lands.

In due time, Space Colonization will begin. There is no doubt about this.


apaosha wrote:
Until enough other people join you and a society of laws and common welfare is instituted ... necessitating a power grab ....

The cycle is inevitable. But if it is not repeated, the faggot, or Civilized Man, will be the only one reproducing, as he will be the only one supported by the state.

This will lead to the elimination of the above traits you so esteem.

That is correct.

As much as I hate to say it, Religion seems to be the only saving grace to keep such masses of people running "forward".


apaosha wrote:
War is necessary, I think. And soon. Something drastic, like a nuclear holocaust, which will push mankind to its limits and open new vistas of overcoming.

:twisted:

I predict war on the horizon, another Holocaust perhaps, albeit unlikely.

A Nuclear Holocaust seems much more probable. The Jews are predestined to repeat their fate over & over again.

I believe The Jews are history's most Sado-Masochistic people. They needlessly-sacrifice themselves just to make a point.

...talk about Religious Fervor. Nothing compares. Judeo-Christianity and Secular Paganism have built the Western Empire.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Age of Faggots
PostPosted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 3:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 11:55 pm
Posts: 1466
Location: The Edge
apaosha wrote:
Women are generally weaker and less assertive as a direct result of their biological role in the human social unit as carers for children; this role demands a heavy sense of duty and responsibility and may limit imagination and the capacity to challenge authority or the status quo.

Whereas men have the role as warriors who through competition get to fuck as many women as possible and ensure a superior generation. This role also demands certain other traits.

This is hunter-gatherer archetype, though, and speaks in generalities. This does not preclude the possibility of "masculine" women or "effeminate" men.

Does it not concern you what kind of man is permitted to breed by "modern" society?

An effeminized man makes an ideal Citizen. Or slave. Should men want primacy, the State must fall. Satyr has gone on at length about Institutions becoming the abstracted Alpha-male authority figure, reducing everyone to a submissive position, thus ensuring that the establishment remains unchallenged.

Decadence always comes after too long a peacetime. General anarchy and turbulence is required before new tribes, new organizations, new peoples can emerge.

French Revolution for example. A decaying, corrupt country threw off its monarchical traditions, reinvented itself, and under Napoleon conquered most of Europe. Something like the Grand Armee would not have been possible under the previous society.

Hmmm.. So its a sort of cycle, perhaps? A culture/people/nation comes to dominate its neighbours, goes through a period of supremacy and then slowly declines as its people become weak and complacent and take their soft, protected lives for granted.

Roman Empire, as well ...

Or, you could open up new frontiers, such as Mars or something, and govern yourself in these deserted lands.

Until enough other people join you and a society of laws and common welfare is instituted ... necessitating a power grab ....

The cycle is inevitable. But if it is not repeated, the faggot, or Civilized Man, will be the only one reproducing, as he will be the only one supported by the state.

This will lead to the elimination of the above traits you so esteem.

War is necessary, I think. And soon. Something drastic, like a nuclear holocaust, which will push mankind to its limits and open new vistas of overcoming.

:twisted:
Do not be disheartened....it's all a matter of time.

Soon frontiers will open and these effeminate males will finds themselves back t what they originally were: bit players, supportive elements, in a reality they cannot ever comprehend and so they remain a victim of it.

In the meantime one must bide his time, be patient and live parasitically.

History repeats itself, and the cycle continues.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Age of Faggots
PostPosted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 7:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 11:43 pm
Posts: 476
Location: TX, USA
Quote:
But, this new form of sociality [sic] will stagnate and fall too and something else will replace it. Which is inevitable.


If you believe this is the inevitability of change, why rush things by promoting war? Reason concludes that change will occur with or without human interference, as it has far longer than human life itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Age of Faggots
PostPosted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 10:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 11:55 pm
Posts: 1466
Location: The Edge
apaosha wrote:
But, if you use frontiers as your only prospect of the return of the masculine spirit, then no matter where these frontiers are they will eventually become just as hampered as the "heartlands" where the softness you are escaping resides.
You think space will be hampered?

Quote:
I think that these heartlands are not permanent, the Institution, the State, the People, the Culture is not permanent. I think that to destroy the current status quo in the form of revolution, coup etc. is a possible way forward.
Nothing is permanent but some things, like human nature, changes very slowly.

A revolution will not change human nature, it will only give it a new ideal that will never be realized or lived up to.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Age of Faggots
PostPosted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 9:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 11:55 pm
Posts: 1466
Location: The Edge
apaosha wrote:
@Satyr:

Quote:
You think space will be hampered?


If the space humans come to populate is finite, then yes.

But either way, your expanding from a central core of decadence which grows to match your progress, frontiers becoming heartlands over time.
If the frontier of space becomes accessible then you will see splintering occurring.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Age of Faggots
PostPosted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 9:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 11:43 pm
Posts: 476
Location: TX, USA
Quote:
I wish to promote war because I am a self-aggrandizing, self-serving egotist with a lust for power. And I want to see the world reborn out of its own ashes in my lifetime.

Your country has not served you well for if it did you would have learned 'self-aggrandizing, self-serving egotists with a lust for power' have very short lifetimes to match their very short visions of a future that will never arrive. It's apparent that the reason you wish to promote war is you are battling your own ego-mind which will be your early downfall.

'Tis a pity to see such a mind out of control where reason and logic is overrun with foolish and dangerous ideas such as what you espouse in the anonymity of cyberspace.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Age of Faggots
PostPosted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 8:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 11:43 pm
Posts: 476
Location: TX, USA
Quote:
I would prefer a short, eventful life to a long, boring one. Easily.

Your preference for a short eventful life equals your inability to get beyond your short sighted life. May your wish shall come true...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Age of Faggots
PostPosted: Sun Jun 28, 2009 12:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 11:55 pm
Posts: 1466
Location: The Edge
apaosha wrote:

Splintering .... of the species? Into different species?

Or just cultures?
Both because culture than affects the species - memes, or prolonged environmental conditions, and conditioning, alters genes.

Quote:
Still, I think there would be decadence in this instance too.
How so?

Imagine a frontier you can get lost in, hide indefinitely, and live whatever life you choose, if you have access to the resources.
Let your imagination go.

If in a span of a few thousand years genetic isolation resulted in the different races then imagine what longer spans of genetic isolation, affected and/or directed by controlled environmental conditions, would result in.

This is Panspermia...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Age of Faggots
PostPosted: Sun Jun 28, 2009 2:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 10:23 am
Posts: 220
Satyr wrote:
...memes, or prolonged environmental conditions, and conditioning, alters genes.

:lol: Lamarck was right?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Age of Faggots
PostPosted: Sun Jun 28, 2009 3:19 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:14 pm
Posts: 846
apaosha wrote:
American Empire already happened. Straight after 2nd world war. World was divided between US and USSR.

Its at its peak at the moment. Cultural, political and military influence of the US are all-pervasive.

I disagree (that the American Empire has already happened).

I think that Amerikan World Power is peaking, or has peaked, and is beginning its decline. The Empire is just beginning.

While it is true that the compulsion for Empiricism occurred after WWII, and the Cold War, I do not believe the Amerikan Republik was torn apart until the Neo-Conservatives wrested political control from the masses and destroyed our Constitutional, Republican Democracy. George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, and Karl Rove masterminded a hostile takeover of the Amerikan Republik on the mere grounds that they could. In the year 2000, coincidentally-speaking (?), The Supreme Court appointed George W. Bush as The President of the United States of America. He was *NOT* publicly-elected. This is when Democracy failed in the USA, and has now become a sham, a mockery of a Government "by the people". (Note that this same occurrence has just happened in Iran, this week.) Now, Stupidity and Majority-rule owns the future of Amerika...Quantity >>> Quality. And "stupid people" are breeding much faster than "smart people", as what Sociologists would tell us. And I think that is mainly-correct, with some exceptions.

In our democratic system, in The States, an idiot counts as an Equal to an intelligent person.

This will not last very long in history, perhaps two-to-three more decades, and you can quote me on that, until Hedonism and Moral Decadence overrides the populace, and "The Great Society" begins imploding even faster than it is right now. Stupid people desperately-want to believe they are intelligent, and should be protected with "Rights" even though they are completely-unintelligent and undeserving of the "Rights" sacrificed to them by prior generations of men & women who struggled and sacrificed to get where Humanity is. And in this way, the Vanity of people creates lives lived in-vain, and in-spite of themselves. I am referring to those people who do not know the meaning of the words: Struggle & Sacrifice. I am referring to those who delusively-believe the Government or Big Brother has their back, when, in-reality, Nature is much, much more Cruel than these delusions allow for. People, in Amerika, are instilled with an immensely-false sense-of-security. Pride swells. Ego swells. And then the system begins to shutdown from over-exhaustion and over-consumption. Right now, in Amerika, people have instinctively-quit consuming...just stopped altogether. And this is dangerous...because The World depends on the all-consuming nature of the Amerikan Empire. If the consumers quit consuming then what happens next??? (Nobody knows insofar as nobody thinks about the consequences.)

I believe the Amerikan Republik fell on 9/11, when the masses gave into fear and allowed Bush and Cheney to instigate their Neo-Conservative plans to create a "stable Middle East". There was a website on the internet long ago called "Project for a New American Century" in-which the Neo-Conservatives outlined their plans to maintain Amerikan Superpower by creating a military presence in the oil-rich, and unstable, Middle East. They succeeded. And Fascism has now overtaken Amerikan Politics where the President only-owes Rhetoric to his position, and nothing more! That Amerika went to war in Iraq over "Weapons of Mass Destruction" is blatantly-false. And because this Lie reverberates throughout the Fallen Amerikan Republik, inspiring a clearly-Unjust War, the Amerikan Empire has now become fully-formed, which is something I have repeated throughout my posts on philosophy forums. Tyranny leads the (fearful, and stupid) Amerikan People. And we have become soft, decadent, and weak as a Nation.

But the World of Nations is over, as I see it. Globalization and Feminization are set to roll over everything. This is a New Era, so-to-speak, regarding the Human Specie. And I do not see everybody climbing on-board concerning the next steps of Human Evolution. Many people are going to become bred right out of existence. All social/moral Authorities are being transferred to the State Authority...to raise your children, to produce your food, and to even think your thoughts for you. You will sit back, and do nothing, except forget you are a cog in the Institutionalized Machine. (I like to use The Matrix Analogy for this point.)


apaosha wrote:
Quote:
I predict war on the horizon, another Holocaust perhaps, albeit unlikely.

Have you ever read Rainbow Six, by Tom Clancy?

The plot is basically about environmental terrorists who engineer this super virus to destroy all of humanity; except themselves, thus supposedely protecting the environment from mans baleful influence.
The virus was intended to be released during the Olympic games and was slow-acting, thus ensuring it was spread throughout the world before killing anyone.

This is another possibility, if one is inclined to such.

I do not think that killing many people will achieve much, personally. The State will still reform. It is the same with anarchy. But the value of the period of Chaos in between is inestimable, because it gives a huge potential of possibility for what the ensuing form of Order will be.

I predict that there will be massive die-offs of human populations in the decades to come, based on natural viral diseases introduced into an increasingly-inbreeding populace, war (amongst Third World nations, based on water rights), a Nuclear Holocaust in the Middle East (once the Arabs/Muslims obtain Nuclear Arms), and a vastly-arising degree of human sexual impotence (Human v Transhuman genetic mixing). I think, given enough time, the Human Specie will become infertile to those who are genetic failures and cannot naturally-reproduce, as a completely-Natural phenomenon.

I think the Human Specie is going to split into those who are Human (Animals/Beasts) and those who are Transhuman (Civilized, Intelligent People). I presume this will entail some kind of new Master-Slave dialect. I think that the stupid people, of this context, control nothing meaningful, and have no say in the matters of Human Fate/Destiny. I also think that those who cannot adapt to the oncoming degrees of Institutionalized Globalization and Human Feminization will parish without a doubt. I think Amerika is going to become a fragmented Empire, where people will split between those individuals who seek to remain living in the past, and those who can see the future, or tomorrow, and can accurately-predict where tomorrow is going. I sincerely-doubt that "The Spirit of Man" will ever die. I also have the feeling, an intuition, that an Amerikan Revolution is going to take place, or begin, in this Century. I think this will fragment the Amerikan Empire apart based on whichever parts of the country rebel against Empiricism and Absolute, Dictatorial, Communist Control. I look forward to picking which side I am going to choose because I have no idea which will suit my personal, ideological tastes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Age of Faggots
PostPosted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 2:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 11:55 pm
Posts: 1466
Location: The Edge
apaosha wrote:
Any society or culture, following your principles of Feminization, will gradually become decadent over time.
You misunderstand...nobody is following Feminization. Feminization is a natural product of social behavior and the given environmental circumstances.

apaosha wrote:
My contention is that this process culminates in a period of anarchy when the society is so weak it collapses in on itself, or is invaded and conquered by a more vigorous neighbour. My examples were France as a kingdom and the Roman Empire. There are probably others.
Yes, decadence is one of the final stages of cultural decline. The U.S. is going through it as we speak.

apaosha wrote:
In the case of a future, possible, global culture or society, with no neighbours to speak of, the former possibility seems the only outcome.
No, because once a culture is in decline some may choose to get out before it's too late or just because they don't like what is occurring, and start fresh.

apaosha wrote:
Has any culture remained indefinitely or unchanged since its inception?
None because superorganisms follow the same life stages as any organism.

apaosha wrote:
Frontiers have never remained frontiers for long, if they were in any way habitable. America, for example. The Amazon, once impenetrable rain forest, is being logged and the clearings turned into farmland.
Your thinking is too affected by earthly conditions.
On earth space is small, space is huge if not infinite.

apaosha wrote:
My point is that colonization of a region starts when the region is a frontier; some few people settle their first, these invite their friends and relations, who invite more people, the population breeds and suddenly you have a city. A society forms.
Yes, but in space any misfits could still venture forth into unchartered regions.

There would be no bounds, except death.
apaosha wrote:
Whether or not this society will be totally suborned by the parent society seems to depend on geography, physical distance or intervening features. The Sea, or Space. In the Amazon, the frontier is surrounded on all sides by Brazil, so little independence/autonomy is possible. If the new society were on Mars, for example, influence from Earth would be minimal and only in the form of supplies/support and would disappear once the colony became self-sufficient or until travel between the 2 places became easier. This would allow greater freedoms on the part of the colonists.
If a few mountain ranges and ocean spans can make such an obvious genetic difference, then imagine what kind of fragmentation and genetic divergence would occur when there are lgihtyears in between colonies.

apaosha wrote:
But this sort of colony would still strive sooner or later towards order and stability; establishing institutions and promoting feminization in the interests of preserving these institutions. And at some point there will be invasion or a civil war and the culture will be remade.
Here, again, we are delving into degree.
Huge population necessitate more feminization, smaller populations necessitate less.

There's a relationship between the size of the community an individual exists within and the level of docility stupidity, conformity it demands of him.
This is why Nihilistic, self-deprecating dogmas, like Buddhism and Christianity occur when population reach a size which stresses environment.
The ideals they impose as virtuous are necessities, forced by the relationship of population to resources.

Don't forget that the Ten Commandments were a political document, enacting social laws.
That they had to make a mythical God the judge represents a sophistication is method.

apaosha wrote:
Though, the situation theorised by Orwell in 1984, of 3 superpowers constantly at war with eachother and actively policing/censoring themselves against internal subversion .... is that situation possible do you think?
It is already happening.
this War of Terror is nothing more than the North American alliance trying to establish control over certain regions.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Age of Faggots
PostPosted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 4:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 11:43 pm
Posts: 476
Location: TX, USA
Quote:
apaosha:
Apologies for delay. Exams

You, apaosha the student, working on your certificate of indoctrination so you, too, can become part of the 'herd' you portend to distain. Which factory of education are you plugged into to receive their credentials to allow you to join the herd society so you can mimic the babbling heads that also have been indoctrinated?

You make this statement-
Quote:
There are always a ... "peasant" or "rabble" element in any society. The herd, basically. They exist to be slaves and to serve the Will of the Master type.

... without hesitation but yet your words show you to be of the same "peasant" or "rabble" element that has nothing postive to offer the society in which you leach off other than posting wannabee pseudo-philosophical inanities like -
Quote:
Like I said; these sub-humans promote abnegation of life in the process of searching for an easier more gratifying life that their infirm Will can realistically face

But you, student, are part of the same problem that you are so bitchy about... complaining verbatim like Satyr as if you had no thought of your own. Do you?

"these sub-humans promote abnegation of life" and yet there has been no post, no thread on this board that you have introduced for serious discussion for the members. Only spewing foolish comments and asking foolish questions such as -
Quote:
Has any culture remained indefinitely or unchanged since its inception?

You talk of "There is only this reality and yet it hurts them" in one breath than fantasize about some science fiction society on Mars which you apparently concoct due to your inability to accept "this reality"... such as -
Quote:
If the new society were on Mars, for example, influence from Earth would be minimal and only in the form of supplies/support and would disappear once the colony became self-sufficient or until travel between the 2 places became easier. This would allow greater freedoms on the part of the colonists.


Prior to our ability to transport ourselves globally by means of ships and planes, our societies were isolated and became self-sufficent. But did this separation in any way create differing species? No. Projecting yourself into a fantasy future 2500 years from today and you are really "hoping" for some drastic change in hu'manity ... a society that embraces you and your ideas. Tell me where any semblance of reality is in your dream? There is none unless you prefer to live in absolute denial of today.

Quote:
What is there, mtmynd1, beyond my life? Nothingness perhaps? What is that?

Perfect example of your education and what it has done to your authenticity. Your questions are no more that pleadings for shortcuts to something you will never be able to grasp without experiencing. Trapped in the system of mind games, like you are, you want answers without experiencing, you want to live in some futuristic nightmare because you are unable to be accepted in today's society, you want one, maybe two people on this board to accept your ideas, you want, you want, you want.... but what are you willing to do to EXPERIENCE? Experience takes time, patience, acceptance and honesty... qualities I know you are unable to master over your own slave-like subservient obedience to your mind.

Knowledge may come from answers to your questions but Wisdom comes from Experience.

You have been taught, like so many of your own herd, that you can take shortcuts to learn about life and all it's multiplicities.... go to school, go to college, perhaps University, read book after book after book written by the experienced... these are all shortcuts. But shortcuts to Experience are like a fast food diet - you are slowly starving your intellect to death believing you're intellectual.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Age of Faggots
PostPosted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 5:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 11:55 pm
Posts: 1466
Location: The Edge
The retarded sheep in its desperate attempt to avoid the realization that it is inferior and only alive because the system needs its docile stupidity, confuses pretending to be a sheep, with actually being a sheep.

For instance I can pretend to believe in God, if I wish to manipulate the sheeple that actually do beleive in such childishness. In order to do so successfully I need to repeat their doctrines, verbatim, adorn their symbols, imitate their behaviors, all the while never actually buying into the stupidity, but only using it.

The retarded sheep also mistake it's own motives as being universal virtues, and so because it can only find value by serving the herd, thinking like the herd, and buying into the herd's values, it thinks that all energies should be thusly expended, or else they are worthless...because they are do not offer it any benefit.

The retarded sheep also mistakenly believes that this world should be changed for some "better" one, as all sheeple are governed by self-hatred, insecurity and disdain for existence.

Finally the sheep, in its desperation to find equality - it's highest of all comforting values and one that eliminates its inferiority as inconsequential - mistakes all social interactions as being as self-debasing and reliant on stupidity, as its own.

The distinction between a herd of sheep and a pack of wolves, for instance, is lost on it, because it feels embarrassed for belonging to such an all-inclusive group of docile dimwits and so it wishes to comfort itself by pretending that all social groups are as reliant on weakness and stupidity as its own.

The word discrimination eludes its small brain.
It cannot understand how one can choose hunger to eating dirt, as it does, and so it points to all feeding as being equally indicative of its undiscriminating thickness.

This is how weakness tries to pull down what it cannot understand or reach, so as to feel less insecure about its own nature, as a product of inferior genes.

It's unfortunate that the mind is such a terrible thing for the mindless.
I suppose to a eunuch a penis is a filthy thing, as well, as all feminized minds suffer from some degree of penis envy.

But let's be honest, how can the victims of natural selection not feel some resentment towards life and towards those that enjoy it, as it is?
How can those with little character and courage not feel some secret shame for being lacking in both?
And how can the ashamed not denounce ego as evil or an illusion, for it is their only way to avoid their own shame?

Next time try facing me, you coward, instead of trying to prevent others from becoming more than you can ever be.
Is it my fault that you come from deficient parents or that nature hasn't been kind to you in that area?

You should feel gratitude to your God for being born into an age and a place where your stupidity and weakness is both protect and considered essential to the system's stability. In any other circumstance you would be pushing up daisies like all pieces of shit eventually do.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Age of Faggots
PostPosted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 6:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 11:43 pm
Posts: 476
Location: TX, USA
Why are you wasting your time? Satyr, you foul mouthed, small minded piece, you are pure tedium to read. You write like you think and that is not admirable in the least.

Let's do some counting today on your idiotic ramblings -

Sheep (or sheeple, stupid, retarded, blah, blah, blah...) used EIGHT times! Whoa... really some intelligent writing, Sat... be sure to share your brilliance with that son of yours.

Herd... only 4 times today! Pity, you seem to be even running out of repetition along with any originality.

btw: have you ever asked yourself (yes, I'm quite sure you have a Self) why you are running with 'the herd' at Philosophy Now? Can't find any other company? Pity.

Oh, yes... I noticed the word, 'verbatim' used in your reply. Interesting you once again shortchange yourself by stealing from other's writings. We know where that word came from, fool... just an hour ago -
Quote:
mtmynd1 wrote:
...complaining verbatim like Satyr as if you had no thought of your own. Do you?

I need to direct the same question to you. Obviously you have no thought of your own either! Disgraceful, but understandable for such a wannabee, pseudo-intellectual that can't communicate without hatred in anything he writes.

You have really disintegrated into a character of yourself... like a stooge that knows not when to stop posting inanities like you posted above. Blah, blah, blah blah... you bore me with your nonsense. Why don't you contribute something to this board which can be taken seriously instead of your psychobabble? God, you are pathetic... worse today that yesterday and growing increasingly so.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 97 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Exabot [Bot] and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group