Philosophy Now Forum

thedoc wrote: ↑Sat Dec 23, 2017 4:51 am

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 23, 2017 12:39 am

thedoc wrote: ↑Fri Dec 22, 2017 11:42 pm The division is between the extremes, the majority have no problem, let the extremes work out their own problems. BTW there is no healing as long as the extremes hold to their extreme positions.

And what are the extremes? Are the medians (majority) not a result of the polarity between the extremes?

No.

Thanks for proving my point about extremes.

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 23, 2017 7:13 pm

thedoc wrote: ↑Sat Dec 23, 2017 4:51 am

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 23, 2017 12:39 am

And what are the extremes? Are the medians (majority) not a result of the polarity between the extremes?

No.

Thanks for proving my point about extremes.

You read a lot into nothing.

thedoc wrote: ↑Sat Dec 23, 2017 11:23 pm

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 23, 2017 7:13 pm

thedoc wrote: ↑Sat Dec 23, 2017 4:51 am

No.

Thanks for proving my point about extremes.

You read a lot into nothing.

I am just grateful I can read period, can you say the same?

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Tue Dec 26, 2017 10:39 pm

thedoc wrote: ↑Sat Dec 23, 2017 11:23 pm

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 23, 2017 7:13 pm

Thanks for proving my point about extremes.

You read a lot into nothing.

I am just grateful I can read period, can you say the same?

I've read a lot over the years, I can't say that I've read a lot between the lines.

thedoc wrote: ↑Wed Dec 27, 2017 5:22 am

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Tue Dec 26, 2017 10:39 pm

thedoc wrote: ↑Sat Dec 23, 2017 11:23 pm

You read a lot into nothing.

I am just grateful I can read period, can you say the same?

I've read a lot over the years, I can't say that I've read a lot between the lines.

Maybe you should reread everything you read...you would be surprised how many stories are in one book.

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Wed Dec 27, 2017 6:54 pm Maybe you should reread everything you read...you would be surprised how many stories are in one book.

Most of the books that I read in the past are now gone and I am not able to read them again, I'm not sure that I would have the time.

Any need to heal cock fighting between men ?
Or is it just a refreshing ritual ?

People need good deals.
Someone needs to figure out what a good deal is for a particular couple.
It may take time to find one.

duszek wrote: ↑Wed Dec 27, 2017 8:04 pm Any need to heal cock fighting between men ?
Or is it just a refreshing ritual ?

My vote is refreshing ritual.

People need good deals.
Someone needs to figure out what a good deal is for a particular couple.
It may take time to find one.

And what would be an example of a good deal?

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Wed Dec 27, 2017 8:48 pm And what would be an example of a good deal?

Howling at the moon, and then resolving conflicts.

thedoc wrote: ↑Thu Dec 28, 2017 1:26 am

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Wed Dec 27, 2017 8:48 pm And what would be an example of a good deal?

Howling at the moon, and then resolving conflicts.

You mean drunken sex?

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 30, 2017 3:41 am

thedoc wrote: ↑Thu Dec 28, 2017 1:26 am

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Wed Dec 27, 2017 8:48 pm And what would be an example of a good deal?

Howling at the moon, and then resolving conflicts.

You mean drunken sex?

That could work, but I think you totally missed the reference.

thedoc wrote: ↑Sat Dec 30, 2017 10:52 pm

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 30, 2017 3:41 am

thedoc wrote: ↑Thu Dec 28, 2017 1:26 am

Howling at the moon, and then resolving conflicts.

You mean drunken sex?

That could work, but I think you totally missed the reference.

What if the division between the sexes is really just a collateral form of damage from the division between men?

A good deal is one in which no party feels taken advantage of.

Example: the man provides a house and groceries and the woman keeps it clean and cooks and does not complain.
For some women this would be fine, for others a nightmare.

It would be more honest if people looking for a partner would formulate what they offer and what they expect, like for example:
A man with a house looks for a lady who keeps it clean and plays chess with him.

Or: a gorgeous woman looks for a rich man who will finance her expensive life style.

A romantic man looks for a romantic woman, everyone needs to earn their own living and to wash their own dishes.

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 31, 2017 12:40 am

thedoc wrote: ↑Sat Dec 30, 2017 10:52 pm

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 30, 2017 3:41 am

You mean drunken sex?

That could work, but I think you totally missed the reference.

What if the division between the sexes is really just a collateral form of damage from the division between men?

What if the division is not just between men and women but between different individuals irrespective of gender?

thedoc wrote: ↑Sun Dec 31, 2017 8:53 pm

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 31, 2017 12:40 am

thedoc wrote: ↑Sat Dec 30, 2017 10:52 pm

That could work, but I think you totally missed the reference.

What if the division between the sexes is really just a collateral form of damage from the division between men?

What if the division is not just between men and women but between different individuals irrespective of gender?

True...why not both then? Is so what if we just live in times where everyone hates eachother for no reason other than fear induced by made up standards of conduct?