Re: Should women focus more on jobs or children?
Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2017 9:16 pm
The expression is "stock in trade", doc. Get it right next time.thedoc wrote: But that is VT's stock and trade,
For the discussion of all things philosophical, especially articles in the magazine Philosophy Now.
https://forum.philosophynow.org/
The expression is "stock in trade", doc. Get it right next time.thedoc wrote: But that is VT's stock and trade,
I thought of that, but I like my way better, and you knew what I meant.Harbal wrote:The expression is "stock in trade", doc. Get it right next time.thedoc wrote: But that is VT's stock and trade,
Of course you did, doc.thedoc wrote: I thought of that,
Yes, I've noticed your judgement has a tendency to leave you looking rather dim witted.but I like my way better,
That's no excuse for you not knowing what you meant.and you knew what I meant.
And less is expected of me that way.Harbal wrote:Yes, I've noticed your judgement has a tendency to leave you looking rather dim witted.thedoc wrote:but I like my way better,
"What do you mean?" is, without a doubt, the stupidest question in the English language.thedoc wrote:I thought of that, but I like my way better, and you knew what I meant.Harbal wrote:The expression is "stock in trade", doc. Get it right next time.thedoc wrote: But that is VT's stock and trade,
But it is also the most common, so are you saying that most of the human race is stupid? If so, I would agree.Walker wrote:"What do you mean?" is, without a doubt, the stupidest question in the English language.thedoc wrote:I thought of that, but I like my way better, and you knew what I meant.Harbal wrote: The expression is "stock in trade", doc. Get it right next time.
Not even "Huh?" comes close.
Huh? Better now?Walker wrote:
You could have just cut to the chase and said, "Huh?
thedoc wrote:Oh my! Says the blind pot who can't see that he is not talking to a black kettle.Harbal wrote:The same thing you've been doing all along: making a pillock of yourself.ForCruxSake wrote:You see what I did there?
Yet again Harbal rides into a post, on his donkey, to tilt at windmills, contributing nothing salient to the thread.Harbal wrote:Of course you did, doc.thedoc wrote: I thought of that,
Yes, I've noticed your judgement has a tendency to leave you looking rather dim witted.but I like my way better,
That's no excuse for you not knowing what you meant.and you knew what I meant.
What women want them to focus on?Hobbes' Choice wrote:What 'should' men focus on?
I don't know.ForCruxSake wrote: Or do they? '.
For the man in family, vigilance over truth, ahimsa, cherishing and protecting the precious, calculating implications of action and inaction in light of purpose.Hobbes' Choice wrote:What 'should' men focus on?
Harbal can say more in one sentence than you can in 100 paragraphs.ForCruxSake wrote:Yet again Harbal rides into a post, on his donkey, to tilt at windmills, contributing nothing salient to the thread.Harbal wrote:Of course you did, doc.thedoc wrote: I thought of that,
Yes, I've noticed your judgement has a tendency to leave you looking rather dim witted.but I like my way better,
That's no excuse for you not knowing what you meant.and you knew what I meant.
This is a philosophy forum, and you are on a thread about the role of women with regard to employment or children. If you have nothing to say on the subject, bugger off and allow people the space to discuss. Have you run out of toilet walls to write on? No friends to play with, so you'd rather make enemies? Go do it elsewhere, unless you actually have something salient to say.