Dalek Prime wrote:Lead on, Macduff!
Why would I? As I'm not the one who thinks non-existence has value.
Fill me in when you get there, will ya? I'll wait by the phone...
No need I can tell you now, life goes on without you and in my case my kids go on without me.
You pay for sex with your wife?
Only when it's bad but you are the one who said there is no free disposal?
Ah.... No wonder she makes you pay for sex... Go tell your kids to off themselves. Tell me and your wife how that conversation goes, please.
Nope, if my kids decide to value non-existence more than existence then there is little I can do but if they come to me with the argument that non-existence is more valuable than existence I'll point out to them that logically that means they should kill themselves, after of course I've pointed-out that you cannot assign a value to a non-existent thing.
I'd discuss it if you'd read something about it first. I even sent you the book, fer chrissakes. ...
I got a 404 error and with a Russian link to boot.
I'm not here to teach you.
Why send me a book link then?
I thought you were here to discuss your interpretation of someone's book.
Besides, I would swear you just counseled me to off myself....
Nope, I pointed out that if you value non-existence above existence and claim that altruism is your motivating force then logically you should become non-existent.
Apples.... Or peaches... Oh, heck, I'm not picky.
Do non-existent apples and peaches have the same value as existent ones?