Should people still be regarded as criminals under these circumstances?
-
- Posts: 5621
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:39 am
Should people still be regarded as criminals under these circumstances?
You know how technology keeps progressing so let's say we have this scenario.
We have a serial murderer who normally would be executed or punished for his crimes. Let's say that the people he killed can be restored back to life and that the restored people suffer no lingering effects from the murders. Let's further say that through an operation, the murderer can be changed so that he doesn't go around hurting or killing people anymore, in effect just as if the murders never happened.
Now it's true that the murders did occur. Yet they can be erased from the record books based on what I just said. Should the guilty be punished? What do you think?
PhilX
We have a serial murderer who normally would be executed or punished for his crimes. Let's say that the people he killed can be restored back to life and that the restored people suffer no lingering effects from the murders. Let's further say that through an operation, the murderer can be changed so that he doesn't go around hurting or killing people anymore, in effect just as if the murders never happened.
Now it's true that the murders did occur. Yet they can be erased from the record books based on what I just said. Should the guilty be punished? What do you think?
PhilX
-
- Posts: 4922
- Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2015 4:48 am
- Location: Living in a tree with Polly.
Re: Should people still be regarded as criminals under these circumstances?
Your scenario has about as much impact as the act of deleting a file, and replacing it with a copy.
- Hobbes' Choice
- Posts: 8364
- Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:45 am
Re: Should people still be regarded as criminals under these circumstances?
I think you are mental.Philosophy Explorer wrote: What do you think?
PhilX
-
- Posts: 5621
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:39 am
Re: Should people still be regarded as criminals under these circumstances?
You think?Hobbes' Choice wrote:I think you are mental.Philosophy Explorer wrote: What do you think?
PhilX
PhilX
-
- Posts: 4007
- Joined: Wed May 13, 2015 1:05 am
- Location: Australia
Re: Should people still be regarded as criminals under these circumstances?
Somebody will have to break it you, Phil. Dead people cannot come back to life except in the confused minds of people like Immanuel Can.
-
- Posts: 5621
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:39 am
Re: Should people still be regarded as criminals under these circumstances?
Pretend it can happen just like the thought experiments of Albert Einstein.Obvious Leo wrote:Somebody will have to break it you, Phil. Dead people cannot come back to life except in the confused minds of people like Immanuel Can.
PhilX
Re: Should people still be regarded as criminals under these circumstances?
Whether a society believes that dead people are resurrected and that their experience is not permanently harmful has no bearing on its response to crime. (See Christian nations through history.)
Our attitude is based, not on the effect on the victim, but on entirely different factors: our perception of human nature, our idea of the citizen's place in society, our relative desire for revenge, social order, preservation of the power structure, the level of collective vindictiveness and blood-lust, and our assessment of the state and role of science.
A mind-wipe or homocidectomy - its very existence, the resources invested in its development - points to a society that doesn't want revenge or to hold grudges, but to fix a technical problem. If that works, the subject is no longer the original killer and can be redeployed in a different societal function. (Whether the victims stay dead or not is irrelevant.)
A society that wanted to fix these problems could find ways far short of your fanciful one. Some communities place more emphasis on prevention - not only of crimes, but of raising criminals. Some communities treat criminals as dysfunctional citizens who need help. Some societies wait with bated breath for a spectacularly violent crime, so that they can weep on camera and waste thousands of flowers, opine all over the airwaves about why this happened and what should be done, put the perp through interrogations, trials, appeals, imprisonment and paradings before the public for years before finally offing him; argue in courtrooms and legislative assemblies over what-all can't be done and why... wallow and revel and make tons of money... It's all about attitude, dude.
Our attitude is based, not on the effect on the victim, but on entirely different factors: our perception of human nature, our idea of the citizen's place in society, our relative desire for revenge, social order, preservation of the power structure, the level of collective vindictiveness and blood-lust, and our assessment of the state and role of science.
A mind-wipe or homocidectomy - its very existence, the resources invested in its development - points to a society that doesn't want revenge or to hold grudges, but to fix a technical problem. If that works, the subject is no longer the original killer and can be redeployed in a different societal function. (Whether the victims stay dead or not is irrelevant.)
A society that wanted to fix these problems could find ways far short of your fanciful one. Some communities place more emphasis on prevention - not only of crimes, but of raising criminals. Some communities treat criminals as dysfunctional citizens who need help. Some societies wait with bated breath for a spectacularly violent crime, so that they can weep on camera and waste thousands of flowers, opine all over the airwaves about why this happened and what should be done, put the perp through interrogations, trials, appeals, imprisonment and paradings before the public for years before finally offing him; argue in courtrooms and legislative assemblies over what-all can't be done and why... wallow and revel and make tons of money... It's all about attitude, dude.
-
- Posts: 4922
- Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2015 4:48 am
- Location: Living in a tree with Polly.
Re: Should people still be regarded as criminals under these circumstances?
Well, I'm a firm believer in the power of a solid thought experiment. Not much else, though...Philosophy Explorer wrote:Pretend it can happen just like the thought experiments of Albert Einstein.Obvious Leo wrote:Somebody will have to break it you, Phil. Dead people cannot come back to life except in the confused minds of people like Immanuel Can.
PhilX
-
- Posts: 5621
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:39 am
Re: Should people still be regarded as criminals under these circumstances?
Solid to you may be mush to someone else.Dalek Prime wrote:Well, I'm a firm believer in the power of a solid thought experiment. Not much else, though...Philosophy Explorer wrote:Pretend it can happen just like the thought experiments of Albert Einstein.Obvious Leo wrote:Somebody will have to break it you, Phil. Dead people cannot come back to life except in the confused minds of people like Immanuel Can.
PhilX
PhilX
-
- Posts: 4922
- Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2015 4:48 am
- Location: Living in a tree with Polly.
Re: Should people still be regarded as criminals under these circumstances?
Most mush contains solids, if you sift through it, Phil.
-
- Posts: 5621
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:39 am
Re: Should people still be regarded as criminals under these circumstances?
Regardless of its contents, does mush have a definite shape or does it take on the shape of its container?Dalek Prime wrote:Most mush contains solids, if you sift through it, Phil.
PhilX
-
- Posts: 4922
- Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2015 4:48 am
- Location: Living in a tree with Polly.
Re: Should people still be regarded as criminals under these circumstances?
Depends on the temperature. We are talking frozen mush, no?Philosophy Explorer wrote:Regardless of its contents, does mush have a definite shape or does it take on the shape of its container?Dalek Prime wrote:Most mush contains solids, if you sift through it, Phil.
PhilX
Anyways, I'm trying to figure out why you would dismiss a well considered thought experiment. Would you explain?
-
- Posts: 5621
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:39 am
Re: Should people still be regarded as criminals under these circumstances?
Just the opposite Dalek. I don't know where you got that impression from.Dalek Prime wrote:Depends on the temperature. We are talking frozen mush, no?Philosophy Explorer wrote:Regardless of its contents, does mush have a definite shape or does it take on the shape of its container?Dalek Prime wrote:Most mush contains solids, if you sift through it, Phil.
PhilX
Anyways, I'm trying to figure out why you would dismiss a well considered thought experiment. Would you explain?
PhilX
Re: Should people still be regarded as criminals under these circumstances?
shouldaknownbettershouldaknownbettershouldaknownbetter
- henry quirk
- Posts: 14706
- Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
- Location: Right here, a little less busy.
Phil,
If it were possible to edit life/lives as you suggest, living would cease to have meaning. The finite-ness of living, and the irrevocability of the past, makes for the meaningful striving in the here and and now, with a mind to shape the future. Easy editing or revision of the past, easy resurrection, these terminate the need to strive, to impart meaning, to hope.
There'd be no need to punish, no need to self-direct or -defend, no need to 'try'.
Absolute power, in this circumstance, doesn't corrupt, but enforces stasis by way of unlimited malleability.
If it were possible to edit life/lives as you suggest, living would cease to have meaning. The finite-ness of living, and the irrevocability of the past, makes for the meaningful striving in the here and and now, with a mind to shape the future. Easy editing or revision of the past, easy resurrection, these terminate the need to strive, to impart meaning, to hope.
There'd be no need to punish, no need to self-direct or -defend, no need to 'try'.
Absolute power, in this circumstance, doesn't corrupt, but enforces stasis by way of unlimited malleability.