To be perfectly honest no I did not read your website.
I am not surprised.
As Typist said, I think most are looking for discussion and thoughts about certain topics on this forum, not to be directed to a web site regardless of whether you made it or not.
The website is being used as a reference and as an argument. Read it.
So you could start by telling me why you think the diet Socrates recommends is inferior? It provides all the nutrients necessary for long term survival, whilst removing the potential dangers of consuming factory farmed meat.
1. It contained toxic chemical drugs.
2. It deprived him of proteins.
3. It was a limited diet.
4. He put the guilt and responsibility that society and humanity bears onto himself, thats a self-harming and lie-based position to take.
And when you state conditions are humane, just how many of these factory farms have you visited? Maybe you have a different definition of humane than the popular one most think of when that word is used.
My website explains the Truth-based definition of humane treatment clearly at http://www.Truthmedia.8k.com
Also why do you think all books on diets, philosophies and so on are insane and a form of self harm?
Why do you think I would say that? I never suggested that.
I guess that means all the animal exploitation and diet thoughts that you've carefully explained in your essay on your website are equally insane and a waste of time.
Oh, look at the way you have to hide from Truth. You have not even read the thing, and you want to try and condemn it.