Sunday Sermon 24th June 2012

Thundril · **Posted:** Tue Jun 26, 2012 11:32 am

The Jesus Head wrote:

Arising_uk wrote:

Quote:

I assume you'd say that Socrates was a psychotic pendant? As he questioned each and every statement his interlocutors made.

This is the problem my friend you actually see yourself as a modern day Socrates.
[and you seem to have forgotten what happened to him]
It appears not to have struck you that no one actually does more than speed read your
remarks thus skipping the labour of thought you put in.
Just imagine what you could achieve in the real world if you put such effort into real things.
Your whole life revolves around a forum with the likes of the people we see here who few would wish to talk to in any real social setting.

The economist John Kenneth Galbraith said on his deathbed "I wish I had drunk more champagne".
The futility of academic life had struck him at his end.
No one is interested in what you have to say here and the one's who do take the trouble to read what you have to say well look at them !
What you are doing is sheer madness and I suspect that you know it is.

And your reason for expending time and energy explaining all this is....what?

Arising_uk · **Joined:** Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am **Posts:** 10396

The Jesus Head wrote:

This is the problem my friend you actually see yourself as a modern day Socrates.
[and you seem to have forgotten what happened to him] ...

What, that he lived a long and fulfilling life and chose the manner of his demise? But nope, I see myself at best as a student of Philosophy and as such I'd make no such comparison.

Quote:

It appears not to have struck you that no one actually does more than speed read your
remarks thus skipping the labour of thought you put in. ...

I think you mean skim-read as speed-reading is a very useful skill. I recommend Tony Buzans book http://www.amazon.co.uk/The-Speed-Reading-Book-Achieve/dp/1406644293/ref=dp_ob_title_bk. Many successful people have such a skill and I think it should be taught in education.

Its not labour as in the main it takes very little effort so far as I think it recreation not work.

Quote:

Just imagine what you could achieve in the real world if you put such effort into real things.

Nice of you to say so but like I say, little effort.

Quote:

Your whole life revolves around a forum with the likes of the people we see here who few would wish to talk to in any real social setting.

Nah! Most of my life revolves around work, family and friends but there are a few here who I'd buy a pint if they ever make it to London.

Quote:

The economist John Kenneth Galbraith said on his deathbed "I wish I had drunk more champagne".

Economists eh! Dismal bunch. Luckily I listened to Hume so I will not have this regret.

Quote:

The futility of academic life had struck him at his end.

Good job I'm not an academic then.

Quote:

No one is interested in what you have to say here and the one's who do take the trouble to read what you have to say well look at them !

What about them? But I amazed that you think yourself the one to speak for all?

Quote:

What you are doing is sheer madness and I suspect that you know it is.

Nah! Like I say, its play and recreation for me.

Thundril · **Posted:** Tue Jun 26, 2012 11:12 pm

Well said, Arising. Next time I'm in the smoke I'll pm you. Know any decent real-ale pubs?

Arising_uk · **Joined:** Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am **Posts:** 10396

Thundril wrote:

Well said, Arising. Next time I'm in the smoke I'll pm you. Know any decent real-ale pubs?

*Choke* *Splutter* Real Ale! Oh Well, I suppose a pint of London Pride or Fullers might go down well. PM when you're about and I'll goggle some Ale pubs to visit. Maybe time it for a philosophynow meet-up or whatever its called, they meet in a pub I think.

Thundril · **Posted:** Wed Jun 27, 2012 10:49 pm

Meet in a pub always sounds deeply sensible. Let's set it up!

The Jesus Head · **Posted:** Thu Jun 28, 2012 6:12 pm

Thundril wrote:

Meet in a pub always sounds deeply sensible. Let's set it up!

I suggest you check out his sexuality first.

Arising_uk · **Joined:** Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am **Posts:** 10396

You and your little closeted wet dreams eh!

The Jesus Head · **Posted:** Thu Jun 28, 2012 9:46 pm

Arising_uk wrote:

:lol: You and your little closeted wet dreams eh!

I just think you are probably the Ted Haggard of this forum.

John · **Posted:** Thu Jun 28, 2012 10:12 pm

The Jesus Head wrote:

Arising_uk wrote:

:lol: You and your little closeted wet dreams eh!

I just think you are probably the Ted Haggard of this forum.

That analogy doesn't really work does it.

Arising_uk · **Joined:** Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am **Posts:** 10396

The Jesus Head wrote:

I just think you are probably the Ted Haggard of this forum.

Who the fuck is Ted Haggard? But so far what you think appears to be closet homosexual dreams.

Thundril · **Posted:** Thu Jun 28, 2012 10:54 pm

The Jesus Head wrote:

Thundril wrote:

Meet in a pub always sounds deeply sensible. Let's set it up!

I suggest you check out his sexuality first.

Why?

The Jesus Head · **Posted:** Fri Jun 29, 2012 2:53 am

Arising_uk wrote:

Quote:

I think you mean skim-read..............

And you stated earlier "I assume you'd say that Socrates was a psychotic pendant? As he questioned each and every statement his interlocutors made."

I think you mean "neurotic" pendant.

The Jesus Head · **Posted:** Fri Jun 29, 2012 2:55 am

Arising_uk wrote:

Quote:

Who the fuck is Ted Haggard?

John knows . Maybe you should have a beer with him.

The Jesus Head · **Posted:** Fri Jun 29, 2012 2:57 am

John wrote:

The Jesus Head wrote:

Arising_uk wrote:

:lol: You and your little closeted wet dreams eh!

I just think you are probably the Ted Haggard of this forum.

That analogy doesn't really work does it.

I think it works perfectly. Both are preachers ,both are neurotic and both are homos.

Thundril · **Posted:** Fri Jun 29, 2012 5:42 am

The Jesus Head wrote:

Arising_uk wrote:

Quote:

I think you mean skim-read..............

And you stated earlier "I assume you'd say that Socrates was a psychotic pendant? As he questioned each and every statement his interlocutors made."

I think you mean "neurotic" pendant.

I think you mean 'neurotic pedant'.

Philosophy Now Forum

Sunday Sermon 24th June 2012

Who is online