”seeds” wrote:Based on recent speculation that there may actually exist an undetected planet in just our little solar system alone, then if I were you, I would not put so much faith in humanity’s present ability to discern the state of other solar systems that are light years away from us, let alone, thousands, or even billions of light years away.
Furthermore (and speculatively speaking), if we were to assign a purpose for the so-called “dead planets” throughout the universe, could they not be viewed as an almost inexhaustible reservoir of future resources for consciousness to draw-upon in its inevitable conquering of space?
And lastly, from the philosophical perspectives of Idealism and a Berkeleyanish Panentheism...
(i.e., the concepts upon which my ideas are based, and the real “core area” of our disagreement)
...there is literally nothing – in all of reality – that is not alive in some context or another (including what appear to be “dead planets”)
Sorry but these views are so heaped with speculation that virtually nothing remains of reality. Our “
philosophical perspectives of Idealism and a Berkeleyanish Panentheism”, are only that and nothing more based solely on our outstanding ability to wishfully speculate!
Also, we will never “conquer space”. Neither is it inevitable. The best we can hope for if we don’t short-change ourselves through internecine wars or environmental depletion is to gradually terraform a few pieces of local real estate congenial to the process. Though the phrase is ubiquitous, the “conquering space” scenario is too reminiscent of science fiction movies.
”seeds” wrote:Therefore, this obviously indispensable role that consciousness allegedly (theoretically) plays in the manifestation of phenomenal (3-D) reality, can hardly be characterized as being “limited.”
Seriously now, you really need to find a different approach in your attempt to dismiss the value of consciousness.
I wish you would stop saying that I’m attempting to dismiss the value of consciousness when I specifically wrote,
“The “value of consciousness” is truly beyond estimate while remaining limited nonetheless”. Consciousness is not an all or nothing entity.
There is no question it remains limited. With the way our brains are wired those limitations are not hypothetical but factual. In effect, there’s every reason to believe human intelligence or brain power may already have reached its “evolutionary limit”. Is it not paradoxical to think consciousness can exceed the intellectual limits imposed by both physics and biology? Consciousness, as currently contained, may already have reached its first major milestone in the acknowledgement that this is likely to be as good as it gets.
”Dubious” wrote:Logically, it would seem to me, the “noumenal underpinning of the universe” had to preexist its creation. What you seem to be saying is that the universe (or its apparent reality) can be re-morphed as informationally-based variables whose conditions are amenable to consciousness.
”seeds” wrote:Yes, it can be “re-morphed.”
Do you actually think that we could be communicating right now through the means of satellites beaming electrons through space were it not for quantum physicists “re-morphing” the original clays of creation to suit our needs and desires?
Not certain what this means exactly but if I get the gist of it, I submit they haven’t “re-morphed” anything. What they’ve done is manipulate the subatomic or quantum realm (because they can) to do service to our needs and desires.
You seem to regard quantum theory as having the potential of extracting a god from consciousness. If this view is viable, then it’s equally possible we are surrounded by a universe that’s already been morphed to some other entity’s far greater extension of consciousness.
Methinks not so! Consciousness to whatever extreme cannot bend or warp reality to its own specifications beyond what is inherent in the universe from the very beginning. It may allow itself to be discovered by imaginative leaps but not infringed except perhaps in very minor ways.
”seeds” wrote:Again, Dubious, if you can think of something in all of reality that is more important than life and consciousness, then name it!
...that which caused it! The Universe as a petrie dish of possibilities while being under no obligation to cause anything by way of
purpose or conscious intent these being merely side-effects of its own secondary and tertiary creations meaning the likes of us!
We may think consciousness makes us elite in the universe and yet we remain as much subject to what our lonesome little planet does by way of climate, earthquakes and volcanoes as the first cave man who barbecued a bison!
There were other points mentioned I was going to respond to but at the moment I’m top-heavy with other affairs. Also, we’re so diametrical in our views that we cancel each other out. I don’t think there’s any point in repeating our arguments even though it was interesting while it lasted.
P.S. Your sketches are really neat! They illustrate your views quite well!