It sure as hell wasn't about any 'crime against humanity'. Churchill and co knew about the concentration camps and massacres long before they claimed they did. And throwing Poland under the bus to suffer under another evil dictator, one who had been murdering millions of his own people for years, was really showing 'compassion' wasn't it? It was about control and how anyone could dare to have the audacity to 'take ownership' of a country without first asking GB. The genocide plan was a side issue that no one particularly gave a shit about, hence the extreme reluctance to take Jewish refugees. And you don't consider the atom bomb a crime against humanity? Oh, hang on, that was the 'goodies' who did that one. Phew! That's so much better.artisticsolution wrote: ↑Sat Aug 26, 2017 4:00 amSo taking out Hitler was to take his country's resources, not because of his crime against humanity?vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Fri Aug 25, 2017 4:37 amYou misunderstand me. What the fuck do you think war is about? OMG. No wonder politicians so effortlessly manipulate people.artisticsolution wrote: ↑Fri Aug 25, 2017 3:43 am Sadly no, veg. This is what Trump is proposing and no one as of yet has Amy problem with 'war for profit'.
People are so shortsighted in their immorality these days. They have absolutely no idea how many thing could go against their best interest going down this road. Doesn't anyone think 2 chess moves ahead anymore?
As an aside, it was the crippling penalties that Germany was forced to pay after WW1 (another bullshit war which was about feuding European royal familes squabbling over power and control, kept going interminably by money-hungry arms manufacturers so eventually no one knew what the fuck it was about) that destroyed its economy and brought about WW11.
Plus, aren't the Germans criticised for believing the crap the Nazis told them? Gosh. Fancy believing the crap politicians feed us.I mean, 'we' would never be that stupid.