I wrote: " If the young are spiritually killed in the schools, what can be better for the worship of the Great Beast than their indoctrination into the land of snowflakes where the Great Beast defines what the love of truth means to politically correct snowflakes."Greta wrote: ↑Mon May 29, 2017 4:02 amOh, are you still going on about this? *yawwwn*Nick_A wrote: ↑Mon May 29, 2017 12:59 amGreta wrote this about me on the second page of this topic:
Obviously all this is untrue. Have you suffered any feral attacks or harassed by my agenda whatever that is? Is there anything against the rules to discuss Plato and others F4 called a "cast of characters?" I there anything wrong with including their ideas in the perspective of modern problems? No it isn’t against the rules but it does provoke secular intolerance against what it believes is right. This is intolerable and this annoyance must be eliminated. This doesn’t bother me but when you consider the harm done by this mentality in secular progressive education it truly is a crime against the young.Yes. "Monomania" is an excellent word in context. In philosophy forums, as with any forums (I'm also a member of a music forum) everyone has "their thing". The ones who annoy are those who keep harping about the same thing, starting numerous threads on more or less the same thing, often with some whining - bumping their agendas at the expense of more open minds.
However, the forum's "failure", ie. his banning, was due to him going a bit feral with the abusiveness and contemptuousness, persistently ignoring warnings. It was the fourth and final strike before which he'd gifted the forum with 107 of his topics, many about Plato's save, Simone's ideas and/or The Great Beast. So he had a good run before finally becoming too annoying to other members and mods who were/are just trying to talk about stuff without too much drama.
... politically correct snowflakes.
I have no reason to lie. If you weren't being over-the-top I wouldn't have banned you. As I said before, I find some of your musings of more interest than some so I would have preferred not to have banned you.
However, you were extremely insulting towards my fellow moderator. Repeatedly. At first we let it go but you pushed and pushed. You were given warnings and you ignored them. You gave us no choice. After your misrepresentations of us here I feel better about the banning now. Thank you.
The final three words of your post, highlighted above, summarise how tolerant you are, ie. even less tolerant of others than others have been of you.
Yes they are being turned into mindless politically correct snowflakes without independent minds. You may think it lovely but for me it is a horror.
Greta, you are doing what is natural for a secular intolerant. Do you have any idea how many times F4 has claimed his superiority and disapproval of not accepting his secular interpretations of Plato. These are just nasty expressions of secular intolerance. Find me one example of any time I was nasty towards you. It can't be done simply because it doesn't exist. All I've witnessed coming out of you and F4 is emotional secular intolerance. Nothing good, especially in philosophy, can come from such self justifying emotion.
You react emotionally against whatever questions your secular beliefs. There is no logic in anything you've written about me. I just represent the support for the essence of religion you find condescending and intolerable. If it were only you, it wouldn't be a problem But people expressing secular intolerance have infested progressive education and find satisfaction in spirit killing. They believe it to be a noble cause.
You will support the spirit killers and I will support those capable of opening the minds and hearts of the young so that they can begin to feel that they are capable of conscious participation in service to objective universal needs and not just an indoctrinated creature blindly serving the whims of the Great Beast in its secular domain Plato described as if in a cave.