True, but on the positive side; your thread is more active than it would have otherwise been.mtmynd1 wrote: Curious if your handle, "Harbal" is a misspelling of "Horrible". Your replies sure are.
Philosophies...
Re: Philosophies...
-
- Posts: 496
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2017 1:48 am
Re: Philosophies...
I suspect his name's an acronym for something that sums him up...mtmynd1 wrote: Curious if your handle, "Harbal" is a misspelling of "Horrible". Your replies sure are.
Has A Really Bad Artificial Intelligence?... No wait, it's an 'L', right, not an 'I'? (You can see where the error might occur...)
Has A Really Bad Artificial Leg?
Has A Really Bad Attitude...Lame
Got there in the end.
Anyone else want to have a go? Roll up! Roll up!
-
- Posts: 496
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2017 1:48 am
Re: Philosophies...
Unfortunately, for all the wrong reasons, after you joined it.Harbal wrote:True, but on the positive side; your thread is more active than it would have otherwise been.mtmynd1 wrote: Curious if your handle, "Harbal" is a misspelling of "Horrible". Your replies sure are.
Re: Philosophies...
I'd have a go but I think that would be cheating.ForCruxSake wrote: Anyone else want to have a go? Roll up! Roll up!
-
- Posts: 5181
- Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2017 6:38 pm
Re: Philosophies...
No ad hominem comments, please.
Re: Philosophies...
You really want to eliminate Harbal's comments altogether, don't you? It would be easier to just put him on ignore.commonsense wrote:No ad hominem comments, please.
Re: Philosophies...
Yes, we have to wade through a lot more dross now that Harbal has started commenting.ForCruxSake wrote:Unfortunately, for all the wrong reasons, after you joined it.Harbal wrote:True, but on the positive side; your thread is more active than it would have otherwise been.mtmynd1 wrote: Curious if your handle, "Harbal" is a misspelling of "Horrible". Your replies sure are.
Re: Philosophies...
...succinctly stated and perfectly logical in how human nature operates. History confirms it.mtmynd1 wrote:
...but I would suggest Religion does not own "God" nor does Philosophy own thought. Great thinkers are not necessarily philosophers nor are those who believe in (a) God(s) religious.
Re: Philosophies...
Nothing 'dubious' about your comment, Thank you.Dubious wrote:...succinctly stated and perfectly logical in how human nature operates. History confirms it.mtmynd1 wrote:
...but I would suggest Religion does not own "God" nor does Philosophy own thought. Great thinkers are not necessarily philosophers nor are those who believe in (a) God(s) religious.
Re: Philosophies...
Life is philosophys' absolute.mtmynd1 wrote:Philosophies are Religions without an Absolute.
Philosophy is malleable and always unsure. Philosophy is an attempt at diversity thru intellect. Philosophy is the unguarded twin of Religion, without a Temple, without the faithful... a vagabond on the landscape seeking that which lies beyond religious beliefs thru the mind's logic.
That's my philosophy.
Philosophy serves life and is measured by life.
Life does not serve philosophy.
Philosophy does not measure life.
Without life, philosophy does not exist.
Temple. Templum. Contemplate.
The temple is both you and the object.
Aside order to Harbal: Does formatting decrease entropy of understanding?
Re: Philosophies...
Has your list been taught to you?Walker wrote: Life is philosophys' absolute.
Philosophy serves life and is measured by life.
Life does not serve philosophy.
Philosophy does not measure life.
Without life, philosophy does not exist.
Temple. Templum. Contemplate.
The temple is both you and the object.
Is your list based upon teachings you have read?
Is your list all you believe philosophy to be?
Is your list susceptible to change?
Is your list your list?
Re: Philosophies...
This information arrives directly from the deep well of truth.mtmynd1 wrote:Has your list been taught to you?Walker wrote: Life is philosophys' absolute.
Philosophy serves life and is measured by life.
Life does not serve philosophy.
Philosophy does not measure life.
Without life, philosophy does not exist.
Temple. Templum. Contemplate.
The temple is both you and the object.
Is your list based upon teachings you have read?
Is your list all you believe philosophy to be?
Is your list susceptible to change?
Is your list your list?
No copyright. Feel free to take.
Re: Philosophies...
ah... I see. From the same well I draw my own truth.Walker wrote: This information arrives directly from the deep well of truth.
No copyright. Feel free to take.
Re: Philosophies...
From what you say you see your own.
Look at it this way.
The water is there to drink.
You drink.
For that reason, is it your “own” water?
Sure, when prancing ego leads the parade.
Look at it this way.
The water is there to drink.
You drink.
For that reason, is it your “own” water?
Sure, when prancing ego leads the parade.
Re: Philosophies...
That is an absolute statement, that contradicts the form of the argument through the function of the answer.mtmynd1 wrote:Philosophies are Religions without an Absolute.
Philosophy is malleable and always unsure. Philosophy is an attempt at diversity thru intellect. Philosophy is the unguarded twin of Religion, without a Temple, without the faithful... a vagabond on the landscape seeking that which lies beyond religious beliefs thru the mind's logic.
That's my philosophy.
I would argue that Philosophy is the observation and manifestation of definition, with these definitions manifesting proportionalities and symmetries which are reflective in structure and equal in function to "truth".