You don't know the difference between relevant and related. Your comment about philosophical sparks was related but not relevant.It was not a speech, pretty or otherwise. And relevance followed the previous comments:
The topic is that people are posting non-philosophical stuff in the wrong places and trying to act is if it's philosophical.People can come to this forum, with or without an argument; even if they just listen in...
You say uncontroversial stuff that people respond "Yeah, that's right" to, but you don't say anything relevant. Gee, do you really like philosophical sparks? Gee, are people who just want to read and learn welcome here? Gee, is Goethe really a great literary and intellectual discovery? What's next -- I'm wrong because a baby yawning is adorable?
Do you think my posts write themselves? This takes time and energy. Look what I'm responding to. Instead of having a philosophical debate with someone of some ability, I'm diagnosing your irrelevant comments. You think people go to college, write countless papers, receive and mull over a ton of criticism, rewrite those papers to become moderately good at this stuff we call philosophy so they can play intellectual tic-tac-toe with you?
It's like you expect Rembrandt to study your child's thousands of finger paintings. And then you want to claim that they're better than what Rembrandt does. It's insane.