Moral Relativism & Cultural Chauvinism

Discussion of articles that appear in the magazine.

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Post Reply
Philosophy Now
Posts: 1205
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2010 8:49 am

Moral Relativism & Cultural Chauvinism

Post by Philosophy Now »

Members of different cultures with different values and beliefs come into frequent conflict, sometimes violent. Exploiter or entrepreneur? Murderer or martyr? “Great Satan” or “Great – Santa!” Gerald Lang asks if we can still pass judgment.

http://philosophynow.org/issues/36/Mora ... Chauvinism
Thundril
Posts: 347
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2011 9:37 pm
Location: Cardiff

Re: Moral Relativism & Cultural Chauvinism

Post by Thundril »

Philosophy Now wrote:Members of different cultures with different values and beliefs come into frequent conflict, sometimes violent. Exploiter or entrepreneur? Murderer or martyr? “Great Satan” or “Great – Santa!” Gerald Lang asks if we can still pass judgment.

http://philosophynow.org/issues/36/Mora ... Chauvinism
Is it not that case that everyone who has a sense of moral right or wrong must believe that his/her moral values are absolute? And, connecting from the other PN article discussion 'How can I know anything at all?' it strikes me as odd that people who insist on the impossibility of absolute knowledge (I'm thinking here of proponents of 'faith') are very often the ones who claim to know what 'absolute morality' is.
Wootah
Posts: 223
Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2009 6:43 am

Re: Moral Relativism & Cultural Chauvinism

Post by Wootah »

Gerald Lang might wish to observe the cultural suicide taking place because of his inability to judge.
Thundril
Posts: 347
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2011 9:37 pm
Location: Cardiff

Re: Moral Relativism & Cultural Chauvinism

Post by Thundril »

Wootah wrote:Gerald Lang might wish to observe the cultural suicide taking place because of his inability to judge.
You reckon anybody in the world would commit cultural suicide because of Lang's judicial skills, or lack thereof? How important do you think the guy is, Woot?
keithprosser2
Posts: 64
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 1:46 pm

Re: Moral Relativism & Cultural Chauvinism

Post by keithprosser2 »

Err, who is Gerald Lang?
Thundril
Posts: 347
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2011 9:37 pm
Location: Cardiff

Re: Moral Relativism & Cultural Chauvinism

Post by Thundril »

keithprosser2 wrote:Err, who is Gerald Lang?
Hi Keith! He's a philosopher. Some serious publications on ethics, I believe. Hangs around Leeds & York Universities. Wrote the PN article which this thread is supposed to be about. I brazenly admit I haven't read the article, (not a subscriber) but felt like joining a discussion provoked by the title and OP. :wink:
osgart
Posts: 517
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2016 7:38 am

Re: Moral Relativism & Cultural Chauvinism

Post by osgart »

moral relativism sounds like a convenient way of saying I can do whatever I want and justify it however I feel. For a just person that is fine.
Because no matter what you believe or what your conviction is there are universal truths that apply to everyone. Without these truths civilization would perish. moral relativism should heed universal truth and only then is it ok.
However mankind always gives us a great number of corrupt and corruptible people that oppress and influence and only play by rules as it suits them. every worthy relation is built on trust when trust is violated society pays the price and the goodness of society deteriorates. America is abundant with good because of universal human rights that its laws adhere to. There is no better place to live than America and no greater inventor of good than what America does despite its mass corruptions. Too often moral relativism is a guise for harming those who do no harm.
Nick_A
Posts: 6208
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2012 1:23 am

Re: Moral Relativism & Cultural Chauvinism

Post by Nick_A »

"When once a certain class of people has been placed by the temporal and spiritual authorities outside the ranks of those whose life has value, then nothing comes more naturally to men than murder." ~ Simone Weil

This is the easy way to solve this problem. Simply bribe people in authority to agree that those you want eliminated lack value. They will be called experts and demand that the people agree with these experts. Then just kill those deemed to lack value and the problem is solved.
Post Reply