What’s So Bad About Smugness?

Discussion of articles that appear in the magazine.

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Post Reply
Philosophy Now
Posts: 724
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2010 8:49 am

What’s So Bad About Smugness?

Post by Philosophy Now » Thu Nov 30, 2017 8:48 pm

Emrys Westacott asks whether it really is a terrible moral failing.

https://philosophynow.org/issues/123/Whats_So_Bad_About_Smugness

tbieter
Posts: 1180
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 6:45 pm
Location: St. Paul, Minnesota, USA

Re: What’s So Bad About Smugness?

Post by tbieter » Thu Nov 30, 2017 8:55 pm

If the professor is smug about his knowledge of smugness, as he may be, that doesn't affect me. I'm not interested in such a fact.

User avatar
Eodnhoj7
Posts: 1004
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2017 3:18 am

Re: What’s So Bad About Smugness?

Post by Eodnhoj7 » Fri Dec 01, 2017 4:00 pm

Being smug is one of the great joys in life, how else are others suppose to convince themselves they are humble and "good" and do no wrong?

Nick_A
Posts: 2142
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2012 1:23 am

Re: What’s So Bad About Smugness?

Post by Nick_A » Sat Dec 02, 2017 3:49 pm

Smugness is like chocolate chip cookies. If your aim is to experience a delightful treat you can’t beat these cookies. However if you want to diet you must avoid them. What can be worse than a smug philosopher and his attitude of superiority which counters the goal of philosophy?Adeimantus points out the problem with these smug philosophers after Socrates had explained the pontential benefits of philosophy. From book six of the Republic

Here Adeimantus interposed and said: To these statements, Socrates, no one can offer a reply; but when you talk in this way, a strange feeling passes over the minds of your hearers: They fancy that they are led astray a little at each step in the argument, owing to their own want of skill in asking and answering questions; these littles accumulate, and at the end of the discussion they are found to have sustained a mighty overthrow and all their former notions appear to be turned upside down. And as unskilful players of draughts are at last shut up by their more skilful adversaries and have no piece to move, so they too find themselves shut up at last;for they have nothing to say in this new game of which words are the counters; and yet all the time they are in the right. The observation is suggested to me by what is now occurring. For any one of us might say, that although in words he is not able to meet you at each step of the argument, he sees as a fact that the votaries of philosophy, when they carry on the study, not only in youth as a part of education, but as the pursuit of their maturer years, most of them become strange monsters, not to say utter rogues, and that those who may be considered the best of them are made useless to the world by the very study which you extol.
Philosophy is the love of wisdom beginning on the foundation “I know nothing.” Smugness is an attitude expressing superiority making the love of wisdom impossible and turning people into the opposite of a philosopher. Of course it sells books at the expense of wisdom. So if your goal is wisdom be wary of your tendency to become smug. If your goal is to sell books and be considered an expert, become smug.

tbieter
Posts: 1180
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 6:45 pm
Location: St. Paul, Minnesota, USA

Re: What’s So Bad About Smugness?

Post by tbieter » Wed Jan 03, 2018 2:57 pm

tbieter wrote:
Thu Nov 30, 2017 8:55 pm
If the professor is smug about his knowledge of smugness, as he may be, that doesn't affect me. I'm not interested in such a fact.
Last night I was watching an episode of the Seinfeld show. After a dispute with a former boyfriend, Elaine got into a cab driven by a Pakistani man. She said: "he was so smug. I hate smugness." To which the cab driver said simply: "Smugness is not a good quality. "https://www.youtube.com/results?search_ ... d+smugness

jayjacobus
Posts: 243
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 9:45 pm

Re: What’s So Bad About Smugness?

Post by jayjacobus » Wed Jan 03, 2018 3:17 pm

You can think you are right and be smug and you can actually be right and be smug. Are they the same? Does it take confirmation to be smug?

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests