Slavoj Žižek

Discussion of articles that appear in the magazine.

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Post Reply
Philosophy Now
Posts: 724
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2010 8:49 am

Slavoj Žižek

Post by Philosophy Now » Mon Oct 30, 2017 5:09 pm

In a London café, Anja Steinbauer chats with the philosopher who invented the word ‘idiosyncratic’.

https://philosophynow.org/issues/122/Slavoj_Zizek

User avatar
-1-
Posts: 600
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 1:08 am

Re: Slavoj Žižek

Post by -1- » Mon Oct 30, 2017 10:46 pm

Žižek -- is this another word Anja's interview subject invented? How do you pronounce it?

User avatar
-1-
Posts: 600
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 1:08 am

Re: Slavoj Žižek

Post by -1- » Mon Oct 30, 2017 10:47 pm

I shan't ask what it means. It is really obvious.

User avatar
Seleucus
Posts: 667
Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 3:53 am

Re: Slavoj Žižek

Post by Seleucus » Tue Oct 31, 2017 2:56 am

This guy's hilarious. If nothing else, watch his Guide to cinema and Guide to ideology movies. Once you get his doubling-back argumentative style it's a lot of fun.

Ansiktsburk
Posts: 233
Joined: Sat Nov 02, 2013 12:03 pm

Re: Slavoj Žižek

Post by Ansiktsburk » Wed Nov 01, 2017 11:37 am

He is most amusing with his "s"-es, his "so on"'s, with pulling his nose and shirt all the time. But he is also one of the great, what I would call, Metaphysicians of this time. He dare to give a scolared(is that the english word?) man's view on things that happens in the world. He's a philosopher of Russel's kind, a guy that dares to speak about what happens. About globalization, refugees, Trump and scho on...

He might not be right about everything, but he's a guy I listen to.

Ansiktsburk
Posts: 233
Joined: Sat Nov 02, 2013 12:03 pm

Re: Slavoj Žižek

Post by Ansiktsburk » Thu Nov 02, 2017 6:41 am

Here is the raw material. Enjoy!

https://youtu.be/JArpTRox5VI

tbieter
Posts: 1180
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 6:45 pm
Location: St. Paul, Minnesota, USA

Re: Slavoj Žižek

Post by tbieter » Fri Nov 10, 2017 3:13 am

Within the first five minutes of the interview PROFESSOR :twisted: Zizek states that he declines to write on Donald Trump because "he is not interesting at all as a person." I understand that Zizek is a communist and an atheist. A collectivist.

In contrast, consider and compare these words from Simone Weil in her essay "What is Sacred in Every Human Being" She starts her essay with this paragraph:

"You do not interest me". These are words that one human being cannot address to another without cruelty or offending against justice."

Later in the essay she writes:
"There is in each human being something sacred. But it is not his person which is not anything more than his personality. It is him, this man, wholly and simply."

I submit that Zizek's rejection of Trump as a human being illustrates the collectivist's mentality.
I doubt that Zizel even possesses the concept of the sacred.

Am I accurate in my criticism of Zizek?

viewtopic.php?f=5&t=16171&p=211997&hilit=zizek#p211997

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests