Re: Is It Possible To Think Without Language?
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2016 10:06 pm
What would non-linguistic thought consist of?
For the discussion of all things philosophical, especially articles in the magazine Philosophy Now.
https://forum.philosophynow.org/
One example is that as a musician/composer, I often think musically--in terms of musical figures, patterns, textures, etc.creativesoul wrote:What would non-linguistic thought consist of?
How does thinking musically as I described require language?creativesoul wrote:Music requires language.
Terrapin Station wrote:...I often think musically--in terms of musical figures, patterns, textures, etc.
Because the thought is about and/or consists of that which requires language. Musical figures, patterns, and textures require language. Thinking in 'terms' requires language.Terrapin Station wrote:How does thinking musically as I described require language?
Give me an example or two of what language it requires specifically.creativesoul wrote:Because the thought is about and/or consists of that which requires language.
It's not a matter of any particular language. Rather, it's that language is necessary for all of those notions. Musical scales and/or instruments are existentially contingent upon language. Thinking about that which is existentially contingent upon language is also existentially contingent upon language. No language, no music. No music, no thought of musical concepts.Terrapin Station wrote:...thinking of the intervallic pattern as an intervallic pattern, in terms of the pitch relationships, or in terms of a fingering or fretboard or keyboard pattern, say. Well, what specifically is the language that requires?
You're saying that when I think of something like the example I gave, I'm necessarily thinking in language or linguistically, correct? I'm talking about that specific instance. You should be, too, because I'm giving you a specific-instance example of thinking that's not linguistic.creativesoul wrote:It's not a matter of any particular language.
Here's the question:Is it possible to think without language?Terrapin Station wrote:You're saying that when I think of something like the example I gave, I'm necessarily thinking in language or linguistically, correct? I'm talking about that specific instance. You should be, too, because I'm giving you a specific-instance example of thinking that's not linguistic.creativesoul wrote:It's not a matter of any particular language.
An imagining.creativesoul wrote:What would non-linguistic thought consist of?
Does it make sense to say that thought/belief consists of the imagination, or that the imagination consists of thought/belief. On my view, the imagination is akin to an apple pie and thought/belief are akin to it's ingredients. That is, to be more specific, the imagination consists of a plurality of different but interrelated, correlated, associated, and/or otherwise connected thought/belief.Justintruth wrote:An imagining.creativesoul wrote:What would non-linguistic thought consist of?
Hmm, I thought you didn't agree with that.creativesoul wrote:Here's the question:Is it possible to think without language?
We agree that it is possible.
Okay, so what in that specific example of thought is the language part? Are you saying that the intervallic pattern is language somehow?We disagree that your example is possible without language. Without language there is no music, no scales, no fretboards, no keyboards...
I thought he was suggesting an identity in a non-linguistic case (although I also thought he should have said something like "a visualization" to be clearer, since we can imagine linguistic things, too).creativesoul wrote:Does it make sense to say that thought/belief consists of the imagination, or that the imagination consists of thought/belief. On my view, the imagination is akin to an apple pie and thought/belief are akin to it's ingredients. That is, to be more specific, the imagination consists of a plurality of different but interrelated, correlated, associated, and/or otherwise connected thought/belief.Justintruth wrote:An imagining.creativesoul wrote:What would non-linguistic thought consist of?
Ill-conceived question. Do not confuse what it takes to be without language and what it takes to be without talking.Terrapin Station wrote:Okay, so what in that specific example of thought is the language part?...
I know, and you're doing it based upon an impoverished notion of what counts as being without language.I'm talking about the content present in a specific example of thinking.
I'm not making a claim about either. I'm simply asking you a question.creativesoul wrote:Ill-conceived question. Do not confuse what it takes to be without language and what it takes to be without talking.Terrapin Station wrote:Okay, so what in that specific example of thought is the language part?...