A Simple Language Test for Analytical Thinkers
A Simple Language Test for Analytical Thinkers
Normally to discover if the person with whom I am speaking has an analytical mind, I have to converse a while on analytical subjects. But I have discovered it to be actually much easier than that.
If you want to discover if someone has an analytical mind, merely discuss definitions. I am amazed how effectively the very concept of definitions has been eradicated from the minds of the masses. Ask anyone to define almost anything and if they can't quote a dictionary, they are completely lost. The average person, the non-thinker, non-analytic, non-critical thinker, cannot distinguish a definition from merely a comment.
Of course for you to use this method, you would have to learn what a definition is yourself, so maybe it isn't for you. But for those very few who can still remember or perhaps even figure out what a definition really is, there is this simple technique to discover the actual bright people from those who merely memorize great detail and regurgitate.
Well constructed definitions are a crucial part of language, yet such construction is stationed quite low on the totem pole of educational priorities. When one loses the language, one loses the society.
If you want to discover if someone has an analytical mind, merely discuss definitions. I am amazed how effectively the very concept of definitions has been eradicated from the minds of the masses. Ask anyone to define almost anything and if they can't quote a dictionary, they are completely lost. The average person, the non-thinker, non-analytic, non-critical thinker, cannot distinguish a definition from merely a comment.
Of course for you to use this method, you would have to learn what a definition is yourself, so maybe it isn't for you. But for those very few who can still remember or perhaps even figure out what a definition really is, there is this simple technique to discover the actual bright people from those who merely memorize great detail and regurgitate.
Well constructed definitions are a crucial part of language, yet such construction is stationed quite low on the totem pole of educational priorities. When one loses the language, one loses the society.
- FlashDangerpants
- Posts: 6335
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:54 pm
Re: A Simple Language Test for Analytical Thinkers
I haven't been on this forum long, and I have already seen many examples of incoherent drivel that is nonetheless peppered with accurate definitions. See for instance the doubly redundant definition of "Continuum" here. The ability to make a mere definition explicit doesn't do much on the whole. The art lies in recognising when the definition is relevantly in question.
It's also something of an honesty test. There is a tendency to misuse definitions of terms in order to provoke programmatic conclusions that sometimes amount to category mistakes. If we're honest, I think we are probably all guilty of that one from time to time. I personally suspect there's a lot of that in the P of Sc. board here, but it is beyond my talent to demonstrate that. The Politics board obviously contains little else, given that politics is [defined by some as] the art of abusing all meanings, that is perhaps to be expected. For instance, there are at least two competing and true definitions of "Exploitation" in this thread.
It's also something of an honesty test. There is a tendency to misuse definitions of terms in order to provoke programmatic conclusions that sometimes amount to category mistakes. If we're honest, I think we are probably all guilty of that one from time to time. I personally suspect there's a lot of that in the P of Sc. board here, but it is beyond my talent to demonstrate that. The Politics board obviously contains little else, given that politics is [defined by some as] the art of abusing all meanings, that is perhaps to be expected. For instance, there are at least two competing and true definitions of "Exploitation" in this thread.
Re: A Simple Language Test for Analytical Thinkers
"When one loses the language, one loses the society." -JSS, I think that this is very true. Once we lose the ability to communicate with one another through language, it will be difficult to live with one another. We use language to communicate and express ourselves. Without this, life would become different and much harder.
-
- Posts: 4922
- Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2015 4:48 am
- Location: Living in a tree with Polly.
Re: A Simple Language Test for Analytical Thinkers
Can you verify this test as accurate, and a part of standard psychological testing? Can a person fail the test by disagreeing with the definition as inadequate? What is the dictionary standard you use, and are willing to accept? Oxford? Which version? What year? Merriam Webster? Collins? Urban Dictionary? Wiktionary? Ambrose Bierce's The Devil's Dictionary? Are narcotics only opioids, as pharmaceutically defined, or all drugs, as legally defined? What if a definition has changed over time, even from it's etymology? What if it's a new word, and is still in flux? What if you want snow to mean all snow, but the Inuit, who have around a hundred words to describe different types of snow, object to your narrow definition in translation? What if, like the Piraha, they have no past or future tense, only a present, and thus have no anxiety about the future, or sorrow for the past?
Yeah, sounds like a solid test to me.
Thankfully, I can rely on well defined formal languages with which to work; C, Lisp, Scheme Forth, Haskell, etc. Oh wait, there are pre-standard and defacto versions? Oh shoot, there are standard dialects of the same language? You must be kidding to say that Common Lisp and Scheme can't both define the empty list as nil. Arent they both lisps? And dotted pairs exist in them, but not in newLisp?... Is it okay if I alias my unix shell commands for convenience, without causing confusion? Well thank goodness mathematics can be agreed upon, though, come to think of it, Newton and Liebnitz used different notations for calculus. And even here on this forum, we can't seem to all agree on what zero divided by zero really is, besides undefined, though not everyone agrees on division by zero as undefined.... *Yawn*... pardon me....
Yeah, sounds like a solid test to me.
Thankfully, I can rely on well defined formal languages with which to work; C, Lisp, Scheme Forth, Haskell, etc. Oh wait, there are pre-standard and defacto versions? Oh shoot, there are standard dialects of the same language? You must be kidding to say that Common Lisp and Scheme can't both define the empty list as nil. Arent they both lisps? And dotted pairs exist in them, but not in newLisp?... Is it okay if I alias my unix shell commands for convenience, without causing confusion? Well thank goodness mathematics can be agreed upon, though, come to think of it, Newton and Liebnitz used different notations for calculus. And even here on this forum, we can't seem to all agree on what zero divided by zero really is, besides undefined, though not everyone agrees on division by zero as undefined.... *Yawn*... pardon me....
Re: A Simple Language Test for Analytical Thinkers
It looks like a test destined to become ever less relevant as people increasingly take on roles in society akin to that of dumb terminals in a network, delegating their analysis to specialist analysts and locating any needed definitions with Google.
- Hobbes' Choice
- Posts: 8364
- Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:45 am
Re: A Simple Language Test for Analytical Thinkers
You are living a Platonist fantasy. There is no such thing as a definition which "really is". The relationship between the signified and the signifier is arbitrary. And for each person that which is signified is related to their unique experience. Even a word as apparently uncontroversial as "dog" means different things to different people.JSS wrote: But for those very few who can still remember or perhaps even figure out what a definition really is, there is this simple technique to discover the actual bright people from those who merely memorize great detail and regurgitate.
.
Re: A Simple Language Test for Analytical Thinkers
You are speaking as a mathematician. Natural language, English for instance, is much more contextual. Attempts to analyse natural language, the project of much 20 th century philosophy in the English speaking world, have had very limited success, because people simply do not use fixed definitions in the way that mathematicians do.JSS wrote:Well constructed definitions are a crucial part of language, yet such construction is stationed quite low on the totem pole of educational priorities. When one loses the language, one loses the society.
Re: A Simple Language Test for Analytical Thinkers
The entire house within which one lives is not made of peers or concrete. But the foundation had better be if you want it to last.uwot wrote:You are speaking as a mathematician. Natural language, English for instance, is much more contextual. Attempts to analyse natural language, the project of much 20 th century philosophy in the English speaking world, have had very limited success, because people simply do not use fixed definitions in the way that mathematicians do.JSS wrote:Well constructed definitions are a crucial part of language, yet such construction is stationed quite low on the totem pole of educational priorities. When one loses the language, one loses the society.
Re: A Simple Language Test for Analytical Thinkers
Right, people use language metaphorically and contextually. QED.JSS wrote:The entire house within which one lives is not made of peers or concrete. But the foundation had better be if you want it to last.
- Hobbes' Choice
- Posts: 8364
- Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:45 am
Re: A Simple Language Test for Analytical Thinkers
Our culture or society is not a static house with foundations, but an ever changing and evolving thing.JSS wrote:The entire house within which one lives is not made of peers or concrete. But the foundation had better be if you want it to last.uwot wrote:You are speaking as a mathematician. Natural language, English for instance, is much more contextual. Attempts to analyse natural language, the project of much 20 th century philosophy in the English speaking world, have had very limited success, because people simply do not use fixed definitions in the way that mathematicians do.JSS wrote:Well constructed definitions are a crucial part of language, yet such construction is stationed quite low on the totem pole of educational priorities. When one loses the language, one loses the society.
Pretending the a word means the same thing today as it did in the past, or the same as it ought to in the future is a complete misunderstanding of both words and culture.
Re: A Simple Language Test for Analytical Thinkers
Continue to worship annihilation, and you just might accomplish it.Hobbes' Choice wrote:Our culture or society is not a static house with foundations, but an ever changing and evolving thing.
Pretending the a word means the same thing today as it did in the past, or the same as it ought to in the future is a complete misunderstanding of both words and culture.
- Arising_uk
- Posts: 12314
- Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am
Re: A Simple Language Test for Analytical Thinkers
And yet natural language parsers are becoming pretty much commonplace now-a-days?uwot wrote:... Attempts to analyse natural language, the project of much 20 th century philosophy in the English speaking world, have had very limited success, because people simply do not use fixed definitions in the way that mathematicians do.
Re: A Simple Language Test for Analytical Thinkers
You tell me, me old China.Arising_uk wrote:And yet natural language parsers are becoming pretty much commonplace now-a-days?
- Hobbes' Choice
- Posts: 8364
- Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:45 am
Re: A Simple Language Test for Analytical Thinkers
It's progress bitch.JSS wrote:Continue to worship annihilation, and you just might accomplish it.Hobbes' Choice wrote:Our culture or society is not a static house with foundations, but an ever changing and evolving thing.
Pretending the a word means the same thing today as it did in the past, or the same as it ought to in the future is a complete misunderstanding of both words and culture.
Don't you like change?
- Arising_uk
- Posts: 12314
- Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am
Re: A Simple Language Test for Analytical Thinkers
Well my phone for one and goggle for another and the iphone for a third. Oh! And loads of help desks.uwot wrote:You tell me, me old China.Arising_uk wrote:And yet natural language parsers are becoming pretty much commonplace now-a-days?