I reached posts no. 333.

General chit-chat

Moderators: AMod, iMod

User avatar
Greta
Posts: 2843
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2015 8:10 am

Re: I reached posts no. 333.

Post by Greta » Tue Dec 26, 2017 11:57 pm

Lacewing wrote:
Tue Dec 26, 2017 10:27 pm
I can always tell when I've successfully gotten through to Bob and pissed him off -- that's when he calls me a bitch.
LW, you will never be the baiter that Bob is - he is a master.

User avatar
Lacewing
Posts: 2228
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2015 2:25 am

Re: I reached posts no. 333.

Post by Lacewing » Wed Dec 27, 2017 12:03 am

Greta wrote:
Tue Dec 26, 2017 11:57 pm
Lacewing wrote:
Tue Dec 26, 2017 10:27 pm
I can always tell when I've successfully gotten through to Bob and pissed him off -- that's when he calls me a bitch.
LW, you will never be the baiter that Bob is - he is a master.
I think you're right. Do you think it's intentional on his part, though? His repertoire seems rather limited and clunky. Maybe that's the brilliance of it. :lol:

User avatar
Greta
Posts: 2843
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2015 8:10 am

Re: I reached posts no. 333.

Post by Greta » Wed Dec 27, 2017 12:12 am

Lacewing wrote:
Wed Dec 27, 2017 12:03 am
Greta wrote:
Tue Dec 26, 2017 11:57 pm
Lacewing wrote:
Tue Dec 26, 2017 10:27 pm
I can always tell when I've successfully gotten through to Bob and pissed him off -- that's when he calls me a bitch.
LW, you will never be the baiter that Bob is - he is a master.
I think you're right. Do you think it's intentional on his part, though? His repertoire seems rather limited and clunky. Maybe that's the brilliance of it. :lol:
It's just him, LW, he is simply a master baiter!

User avatar
Lacewing
Posts: 2228
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2015 2:25 am

Re: I reached posts no. 333.

Post by Lacewing » Wed Dec 27, 2017 12:18 am

Greta wrote:
Wed Dec 27, 2017 12:12 am
It's just him, LW, he is simply a master baiter!
I can agree with that... although I think it's one word and spelled a little differently.

User avatar
Eodnhoj7
Posts: 1004
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2017 3:18 am

Re: I reached posts no. 333.

Post by Eodnhoj7 » Wed Dec 27, 2017 12:43 am

bobevenson wrote:
Tue Dec 26, 2017 11:44 pm
No, it is simply a divinely inspired utterance by the prophet John on the isle of Patmos in the year 96AD.
And neither is the Ouzo prophecy, as it is centered on the book of revelation?

User avatar
-1-
Posts: 613
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 1:08 am

Re: I reached posts no. 333.

Post by -1- » Wed Dec 27, 2017 10:45 am

bobevenson wrote:
Tue Dec 26, 2017 11:44 pm
No, it is simply a divinely inspired utterance by the prophet John on the isle of Patmos in the year 96AD.

Patmos is where the Greek mine Peat Moss. And it is the original birthplace of he hyppopatmos.

bobevenson
Posts: 7337
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
Contact:

Re: I reached posts no. 333.

Post by bobevenson » Wed Dec 27, 2017 2:01 pm

Eodnhoj7 wrote:
Wed Dec 27, 2017 12:43 am
bobevenson wrote:
Tue Dec 26, 2017 11:44 pm
No, it is simply a divinely inspired utterance by the prophet John on the isle of Patmos in the year 96AD.
And neither is the Ouzo prophecy, as it is centered on the book of revelation?
Correct.

User avatar
Eodnhoj7
Posts: 1004
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2017 3:18 am

Re: I reached posts no. 333.

Post by Eodnhoj7 » Wed Dec 27, 2017 6:56 pm

bobevenson wrote:
Wed Dec 27, 2017 2:01 pm
Eodnhoj7 wrote:
Wed Dec 27, 2017 12:43 am
bobevenson wrote:
Tue Dec 26, 2017 11:44 pm
No, it is simply a divinely inspired utterance by the prophet John on the isle of Patmos in the year 96AD.
And neither is the Ouzo prophecy, as it is centered on the book of revelation?
Correct.
Well if Ouzo, being premised on the book of revelation, does not predict the future (even though revelation claims to predict the future) then it does not agree with revelation?

bobevenson
Posts: 7337
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
Contact:

Re: I reached posts no. 333.

Post by bobevenson » Wed Dec 27, 2017 8:23 pm

Eodnhoj7 wrote:
Wed Dec 27, 2017 6:56 pm
bobevenson wrote:
Wed Dec 27, 2017 2:01 pm
Eodnhoj7 wrote:
Wed Dec 27, 2017 12:43 am


And neither is the Ouzo prophecy, as it is centered on the book of revelation?
Corre
ct.
Revelation claims to predict the future.
Please cite chapter and verse.

User avatar
Eodnhoj7
Posts: 1004
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2017 3:18 am

Re: I reached posts no. 333.

Post by Eodnhoj7 » Wed Dec 27, 2017 8:30 pm

bobevenson wrote:
Wed Dec 27, 2017 8:23 pm
Eodnhoj7 wrote:
Wed Dec 27, 2017 6:56 pm
bobevenson wrote:
Wed Dec 27, 2017 2:01 pm

Corre
ct.
Revelation claims to predict the future.
Please cite chapter and verse.
Chapter 1 verse 1
"The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave unto him, to shew unto his servants things which must shortly come to pass; and he sent and signified it by his angel unto his servant John"

bobevenson
Posts: 7337
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
Contact:

Re: I reached posts no. 333.

Post by bobevenson » Wed Dec 27, 2017 8:35 pm

Sorry, that's just poetic license, allegorically speaking.

User avatar
Eodnhoj7
Posts: 1004
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2017 3:18 am

Re: I reached posts no. 333.

Post by Eodnhoj7 » Wed Dec 27, 2017 8:39 pm

bobevenson wrote:
Wed Dec 27, 2017 8:35 pm
Sorry, that's just poetic license, allegorically speaking.
No its not, is that the best response you have? "Must shortly come to pass" is a prediction of the future, as the statement observes the events have not actualized yet, in the context of the statements time.


Try again.

bobevenson
Posts: 7337
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
Contact:

Re: I reached posts no. 333.

Post by bobevenson » Wed Dec 27, 2017 8:42 pm

You simply don't understand prophecy or the book of Revelation.

User avatar
Eodnhoj7
Posts: 1004
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2017 3:18 am

Re: I reached posts no. 333.

Post by Eodnhoj7 » Wed Dec 27, 2017 8:46 pm

bobevenson wrote:
Wed Dec 27, 2017 8:42 pm
You simply don't understand prophecy or the book of Revelation.
Neither do you, and skip the mystical credentials counter argument...it is old.

Try again.

bobevenson
Posts: 7337
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 12:02 am
Contact:

Re: I reached posts no. 333.

Post by bobevenson » Wed Dec 27, 2017 11:43 pm

Listen, pal, you're talking to the only person on Earth who has ever understood the book of Revelation since it was written in 96AD by the prophet John on the isle of Patmos. The entire book is allegorical and not meant to be taken literally.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests