Certainly is.Dontaskme wrote:It's not yours. ...
Who're you talking to then?You're not.
Certainly is.Dontaskme wrote:It's not yours. ...
Who're you talking to then?You're not.
Is/n't.
You're not.
My imaginary friendly foe.
How would you know?Dontaskme wrote:Is/n't.
Seek professional help if this is the case.My imaginary friendly foe.
By not-knowing.
My imaginary friendly foe.
Narh, they'd only confirm what I already know. A waste of time these not-knowing know it alls.
Yep, that's just about what seems to be happening apparently.ken wrote: ↑Tue Aug 22, 2017 10:41 amWhen dontaskme is prepared, and the Truth has been revealed to them, then dontaskme will be able to explain in plain and simple language who and what 'you' are and who and what 'I' am. Until then, like dontaskme keeps repeating, dontaskme does NOT know what they are talking about. This has been proven enough times already with the inability to clarify questions and explain what they are trying to say. They will just keep repeating what others have said without ever really knowing what it is they are repeating.Dontaskme wrote: ↑Tue Aug 22, 2017 10:24 amVery beautiful.ken wrote: ↑Tue Aug 22, 2017 9:42 am
I KNOW you can not do any thing without Me, so you are wel-come.
'I' am the Universe and 'you' are just one part in Me. Therefore, 'you' are M(in)E. 'I' control 'you' and when I have prepared you enough, then you will be ready for Me to reveal the Truth to you. Then we-will-come together as One to create that what IS truly wanted by EVERY One.
The cry of the beloved calling itself home.
I am always home. I can never leave you. You leave me.
But you cannot do without me, so you always return to where you never left.
.
Good job I don't repeat what you have said Ken, cause then I'd only be repeating what other people have said.
How did you know you didn't know?Dontaskme wrote:By not-knowing. ...
I thought you didn't know?Narh, they'd only confirm what I already know. ...
Let's hope you never need them then.A waste of time these not-knowing know it alls.
Dontaskme wrote:By not-knowing. ...
By knowing.
Narh, they'd only confirm what I already know. ...
I don't.
A waste of time these not-knowing know it alls.
I don't need what I already AM
But you don't know anything?Dontaskme wrote:By knowing.
Narh, they'd only confirm what I already know. ...
On a Philosophy forum of all places.I don't.
But you aren't anything?I don't need what I already AM
ken wrote:
Who says that the Universe and God are NOT One and the same
Does the word Universe and the word God mean the same then
How do you know that the Universe is not a conscious entity
Where exactly would one find this so called conscious entity
Have you ever wondered how the conscious entities within the Universe got their consciousness
The natural order required for consciousness is physics followed by chemistry followed by biology
Dontaskme wrote:By knowing.
There is only knowing. Knowing is not known by a ''someone''. You are the knowing that cannot be known. Knower knowing known are one.
Well there is only one place. It's not even a place. Where is 100 miles south of the earth?
I don't need what I already AM
Am that as well.
Consciousness is purely physical. I like your answer.surreptitious57 wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2017 5:27 amThe natural order required for consciousness is physics followed by chemistry followed by biology
Yes it is a good job 'you' do not repeat what 'I' say, that is until 'you' can grasp, understand, and know what 'I' am saying. Until then dontaskme will just keep repeating what others say, like what dontaskme has been doing all along.Dontaskme wrote: ↑Tue Aug 22, 2017 12:22 pmYep, that's just about what seems to be happening apparently.ken wrote: ↑Tue Aug 22, 2017 10:41 amWhen dontaskme is prepared, and the Truth has been revealed to them, then dontaskme will be able to explain in plain and simple language who and what 'you' are and who and what 'I' am. Until then, like dontaskme keeps repeating, dontaskme does NOT know what they are talking about. This has been proven enough times already with the inability to clarify questions and explain what they are trying to say. They will just keep repeating what others have said without ever really knowing what it is they are repeating.
Explaining the unexplained is a repetitive business.
.Good job I don't repeat what you have said Ken, cause then I'd only be repeating what other people have said.
.
First off, did you notice you did NOT answer the actual questions I posed for clarity? You answered what you THOUGHT I was asking.surreptitious57 wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2017 5:27 amken wrote:
Who says that the Universe and God are NOT One and the same
Does the word Universe and the word God mean the same then
How do you know that the Universe is not a conscious entity
Where exactly would one find this so called conscious entity
Have you ever wondered how the conscious entities within the Universe got their consciousness
The natural order required for consciousness is physics followed by chemistry followed by biology
I grasp it when there is the realisation, recognition that there is no one to grasp it.