He was not kicked for this.henry quirk wrote: Gus got kicked cuz he dared to question the notions 'all men are equal' and 'all cultures are equal'. ...
AMod.
I doubt you've been to France but by and large most of France's cities are pretty much no-go for single women at night as they get constantly sexually harassed by white French males.Walker wrote:No Go Zones for women in France.
Don't you think that's taking PC just a bit too far? I mean, outright lying. Tsk tsk.Arising_uk wrote: ↑Tue Aug 08, 2017 11:55 pmI doubt you've been to France but by and large most of France's cities are pretty much no-go for single women at night as they get constantly sexually harassed by white French males.Walker wrote:No Go Zones for women in France.
Yes, I'm sure. Funny how you always seem to have convenient daughters/cousins/cousin-in-laws etc. etc. to report 'first-hand' to you on these things.Arising_uk wrote: ↑Wed Aug 09, 2017 12:13 am Just reporting what my teenage female cousins-in-law report.
The appearance of shared obliviousness within extended families may have, at least in part, been the inspiration for the Progressive eugenics movement that spread from the United States into Germany.Arising_uk wrote: ↑Wed Aug 09, 2017 12:13 am Just reporting what my teenage female cousins-in-law report.
You calling me a liar? If so I think that more a reflection of your life not mine.vegetariantaxidermy wrote: Yes, I'm sure. Funny how you always seem to have convenient daughters/cousins/cousin-in-laws etc. etc. to report 'first-hand' to you on these things.
No idea what this 'Progressive' is and give two shits about your beef with birth control in the USA as you're so backward you don't have a health service and so allow private interests to run things.Walker wrote:The appearance of shared obliviousness within extended families may have, at least in part, been the inspiration for the Progressive eugenics movement that spread from the United States into Germany
How does that 'logic' work??? There's no reason to believe you or anyone else. The world would be a much better place if people were not so ready to believe everything they are told.Arising_uk wrote: ↑Wed Aug 09, 2017 2:33 pmYou calling me a liar? If so I think that more a reflection of your life not mine.vegetariantaxidermy wrote: Yes, I'm sure. Funny how you always seem to have convenient daughters/cousins/cousin-in-laws etc. etc. to report 'first-hand' to you on these things.
You implied I lie about the people I get my anecdotes from, this, to me, says more about your life than mine.vegetariantaxidermy wrote: How does that 'logic' work???
True.There's no reason to believe you or anyone else. ...
It would be even better if people just said they didn't believe what they were told rather than snidely implying the other is a liar.The world would be a much better place if people were not so ready to believe everything they are told. ...
Guilty of hyperbole but it's an anecdote and a behaviour that they think holds for a large chunk of their female friends in France. In fact they were quite adamant about it when I questioned it. Still, some more anecdotal evidence for you if you like - https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/ ... ment-finesAnd you really should have a bit more 'evidence' to present than 'my cousins-in-law said so' when you make an assertion like that. ...
Hmm. Repetition doesn't equal explanation. And I seem to recall you snorting with derision when I posted a Guardian link.Arising_uk wrote: ↑Wed Aug 09, 2017 8:03 pmYou implied I lie about the people I get my anecdotes from, this, to me, says more about your life than mine.vegetariantaxidermy wrote: How does that 'logic' work???True.There's no reason to believe you or anyone else. ...It would be even better if people just said they didn't believe what they were told rather than snidely implying the other is a liar.The world would be a much better place if people were not so ready to believe everything they are told. ...Guilty of hyperbole but it's an anecdote and a behaviour that they think holds for a large chunk of their female friends in France. In fact they were quite adamant about it when I questioned it. Still, some more anecdotal evidence for you if you like - https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/ ... ment-finesAnd you really should have a bit more 'evidence' to present than 'my cousins-in-law said so' when you make an assertion like that. ...
It seems that cousins-in-law, sisters friend, or someone that someone knows, is the most common means of retelling an urban legend.vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Wed Aug 09, 2017 6:26 pmAnd you really should have a bit more 'evidence' to present than 'my cousins-in-law said so' when you make an assertion like that.Arising_uk wrote: ↑Wed Aug 09, 2017 2:33 pmYou calling me a liar? If so I think that more a reflection of your life not mine.vegetariantaxidermy wrote: Yes, I'm sure. Funny how you always seem to have convenient daughters/cousins/cousin-in-laws etc. etc. to report 'first-hand' to you on these things.
What explanation do you want?vegetariantaxidermy wrote:Hmm. Repetition doesn't equal explanation. ...
I think you recall wrongly.And I seem to recall you snorting with derision when I posted a Guardian link. ...
All my linked showed was that a French female minister thinks France has a problem with public sexual harassment of females which is what my anecdote was claiming.You do realise that you can find internet 'evidence' for or against any argument under the Sun don't you? ...
Who was talking about rape? But post away, if it's the Guardian I might pay it some credence but if its some interweeb 'news-site' I'll probably snort.I could post evidence that muslims are raping European women on an epidemic scale. I wonder how much credence you would give that?
Which legend is this?thedoc wrote:It seems that cousins-in-law, sisters friend, or someone that someone knows, is the most common means of retelling an urban legend.
Ok. So if it's a link to something you approve of then it's to be taken seriously (i.e.a PC one that says what you want it to say whether it's true or not). Even whacko sites can inadvertently post something that happens to be true.Arising_uk wrote: ↑Thu Aug 10, 2017 12:56 amWhat explanation do you want?vegetariantaxidermy wrote:Hmm. Repetition doesn't equal explanation. ...I think you recall wrongly.And I seem to recall you snorting with derision when I posted a Guardian link. ...All my linked showed was that a French female minister thinks France has a problem with public sexual harassment of females which is what my anecdote was claiming.You do realise that you can find internet 'evidence' for or against any argument under the Sun don't you? ...Who was talking about rape? But post away, if it's the Guardian I might pay it some credence but if its some interweeb 'news-site' I'll probably snort.I could post evidence that muslims are raping European women on an epidemic scale. I wonder how much credence you would give that?