Dontaskme wrote: ↑Sun Aug 13, 2017 2:22 pm
ken wrote: ↑Sun Aug 13, 2017 1:01 pm
Because dontaskme does NOT know who nor what the 'I' is, that is the reason dontaskme does NOT know what the actual truth IS.
The 'I' does KNOW ALL truth. Unfortunately dontaskme believes they know what is true and right, and it is because of this belief that dontaskme is unable to express truth. 'I', however, do KNOW.
Which I are you referring to?
How many times do I have to write who and what the 'I' IS before dontaskme comprehends what the 'I' is that I am referring to.
I have, on many occasions, wrote the 'I' is God, and, the 'i' is ken, dontaskme, et cetera.
So, the rest of what you wrote is as ridiculous as dontaskme has made it.
If dontaskme really wants to KNOW what I am referring to, then dontaskme will ask questions from a completely OPEN perspective, and NOT from presumptions.
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Sun Aug 13, 2017 2:22 pmIf the ''I'' that is ken knows truth then that ''I'' would also know that the ''I'' that is dontaskme knows truth as well, or is only the ''I'' that is ken the only knower of truth...and all the other ''I'''s don't know anything according to the ''I'' that is ken?
And how can the ''I'' that is ken be sure that the ''I'' that is dontaskme doesn't also know what the ''I'' of ken knows? ...how can ken know that dontaskme doesn't know?....wouldn't that require ken to be inside dontaskme's world to be there in that world as a witness to be able to prove that dontaskme knows truth or not...? and how is that going to happen?
This is how ridiculous your posts are sounding ken?
Remember dontaskme wrote this so how ridiculous this is sounding or not is because of dontaskme. My views are far different from what dontaskme is assuming here. If dontaskme seriously wants to know and understand My answers to these questions, just say so, then I will answer them. But considering where dontaskme is at the moment, there will probably be a considerable amount of explaining to do. If dontaskme is prepared to spend some time understanding Me, then we can proceed. But if dontaskme is not really interested in gaining a more thorough understanding, then there is no use in proceeding.
By the way if that is how ridiculous My posts are sounding, then that is because dontaskme is assuming a lot of things that I am NOT saying. Instead of trying to understand My posts, by NOT presuming what I write, dontaskme would remain completely open. By saying that My posts are sounding ridiculous means that dontaskme is making assumptions and thus NOT open.
The 'I' is NOT ken, nor dontaskme. Is that understood?
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Sun Aug 13, 2017 2:22 pmken wrote: ↑Sun Aug 13, 2017 1:01 pmObviously truth is in no need of explanation. Truth is already known. 'I' am just learning how to explain by expressing correctly how you human beings are able to find, see, know, and understand the Truth by and for yourselves. Contrary to popular belief, this can be very easily done. Finding the human beings who are honest, open enough, and willing to take a good look at them self is the only hard part.
The only way to express truth correctly is to shut-up period!! only then is the truth known instantly.
So, WHY does dontaskme speak so much here in this forum trying to tell others what the truth is from dontaskme's perspective?
Why does dontaskme just shut-up and let the Truth speak for Itself? Why does dontaskme appear to have a NEED to express the truth as dontaskme sees it?
By the way did you even notice that I was NOT talking about expressing truth? Or, did you just
think and assume I was, so jumped to the conclusion that you did?
I WAS talking about HOW to
find truth and expressing that process correctly. I was NOT talking about how to express truth correctly. A big difference that seems to have been overlooked. The Truth, although silent as you also agree with, IS only fully understood and KNOWN to be thee Truth when EVERY thing IS in agreement. But getting to this point, understanding, and knowing is a far way off for those human beings who are NOT open.
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Sun Aug 13, 2017 2:22 pmLike I've said before, dogs and cats are not confused...watch a cat, it will tell you all you want to know about the truth of reality without it ever having to say a word, and it's no coincidence that mans best friend cannot talk.
.
.
And, like what I said before, I never thought those things were confused, as such. But I know for sure adult human beings are generally very confused about some things.
What has a cat told dontaskme about the truth of reality (without ever saying a word)?
If the word speaking dontaskme can not put that into words, then does dontaskme expect other human beings to just accept that a cat can tell them about the truth of reality, just because dontaskme
says that this is the truth?
I have already made the comment that I learned far more about what is right and true about Life and living from younger human beings (children), who by the way also do not necessarily use words to relate to others, than I ever learned from older human beings (adults). And, if any one is interested I can put into words how young children can actually teach what IS true and right in Life.