We can't trust what you say.bobevenson wrote: ↑Mon Oct 30, 2017 9:28 pm Well, I'm a prophet, and I've never been put on the spot.
PhilX
We can't trust what you say.bobevenson wrote: ↑Mon Oct 30, 2017 9:28 pm Well, I'm a prophet, and I've never been put on the spot.
You're beginning to get the picture.bobevenson wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 1:23 pm Apparently you're not convinced I'm a prophet despite the myriad mystical credentials I've presented in support thereof.
Like the way you cling to your clunky, unproductive claims despite their obvious primitive and backward nature in the modern world? Yes, Bob... why do you suppose that is?bobevenson wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 4:46 pm some people can't be convinced of something even in the face of overwhelming evidence.
What a perfect description of you.bobevenson wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 4:46 pm That just shows you that some people can't be convinced of something even in the face of overwhelming evidence.
Please, what are the odds of somebody making a discovery in 20 minutes that the rest of the world couldn't make in 170 years? Makes the lottery look like child's play!Lacewing wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:35 pmLike the way you cling to your clunky, unproductive claims despite their obvious primitive and backward nature in the modern world? Yes, Bob... why do you suppose that is?bobevenson wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 4:46 pm some people can't be convinced of something even in the face of overwhelming evidence.
Discover???bobevenson wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 6:53 pmPlease, what are the odds of somebody making a discover in 20 minutes that the rest of the world couldn't make in 170 years? Makes the lottery look like child's play!Lacewing wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 5:35 pmLike the way you cling to your clunky, unproductive claims despite their obvious primitive and backward nature in the modern world? Yes, Bob... why do you suppose that is?bobevenson wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 4:46 pm some people can't be convinced of something even in the face of overwhelming evidence.
Philosophy Explorer wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 7:00 pmDiscover???bobevenson wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 6:53 pmPlease, what are the odds of somebody making a discovery in 20 minutes that the rest of the world couldn't make in 170 years? Makes the lottery look like child's play!
PhilX
You keep ignoring how the discovery doesn't really mean anything, nor accomplish anything. You've been asked repeatedly, "So what?" And you have no answer. Because there is no usefulness of such information. You are only intoxicated with it because no one else had seen it before you. Big fucking deal, Bob. There are lots of people who see things that no one has seen before. In your case: HOW IS IT USEFUL? WHAT DOES IT CHANGE? You have been unable to answer these simple questions because THERE IS NO FUCKING POINT to it!bobevenson wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 6:53 pm Please, what are the odds of somebody making a discover in 20 minutes that the rest of the world couldn't make in 170 years? Makes the lottery look like child's play!
That episode was merely the result of divine inspiration, guidance and intervention to add another document to my prophetic dossier.Lacewing wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 7:20 pmYou keep ignoring how the discovery doesn't really mean anything, nor accomplish anything.bobevenson wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 6:53 pm Please, what are the odds of somebody making a discovery in 20 minutes that the rest of the world couldn't make in 170 years? Makes the lottery look like child's play!
How is it useful? What does it change?bobevenson wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 7:31 pm That episode was merely the result of divine inspiration, guidance and intervention to add another document to my prophetic dossier.
Is that because you're too lazy to do your own proofreading?bobevenson wrote: ↑Tue Oct 31, 2017 7:17 pm You should take up proofreading in your spare time instead of posting.